Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 07 Sep 2008 (Sunday) 22:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Speedlite instead of strobe?

 
emre2006
Member
57 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Sep 07, 2008 22:53 |  #1

Hi all,

I would like to buy a flash in conjunction with a reflector and maybe a backdrop for home use for portraits 3/4 etc. To start with I am thinking about a large umbrealla or a softbox and a strobe maybe 180WS. Do you think it would give me a similar result by using a speedlite (say 430ex) inside a softbox or used with an umbrella? Pricewise I think speedlite is more expensive than a beginner's strobe, maybe even more expensive than a beginner's well branded strobe?..What are your suggestions?

Cheers,
Emre


Bodies: EOS30, EOS 40D, CONTAX 167 MT
Lenses: canon 70-200 f/4 L IS, carl zeiss 50mm 1.7, canon 50mm 1.8, 17-85 IS, 430EX
Other: Tripods and ball head by Benro, filters by Hoya, camera bag by Lowpro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 07, 2008 23:15 |  #2

Speedlite will burn out, strobes are fan cooled and will last longer without failing, plus flash brighter.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=113639


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emre2006
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
57 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Sep 08, 2008 08:36 |  #3

tim wrote in post #6262340 (external link)
Speedlite will burn out, strobes are fan cooled and will last longer without failing, plus flash brighter.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=113639

Even when you compare a 400$ flash to a 300$ strobe? So you are basicly saying that one cannot produce images with a speedlite without burning out.


Bodies: EOS30, EOS 40D, CONTAX 167 MT
Lenses: canon 70-200 f/4 L IS, carl zeiss 50mm 1.7, canon 50mm 1.8, 17-85 IS, 430EX
Other: Tripods and ball head by Benro, filters by Hoya, camera bag by Lowpro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,453 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4542
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Sep 08, 2008 09:21 |  #4

emre2006 wrote in post #6264220 (external link)
Even when you compare a 400$ flash to a 300$ strobe? So you are basicly saying that one cannot produce images with a speedlite without burning out.

Speedlights MUST have a rest period after consecutive firing (see owner manual...several POTN members have stated that they burned out their flashes!). Quality studio lights do not need a rest period, but can fire endlessly without rest, due to the fans in them, which help to cool them even when in the confines of a softbox, which makes the cooling issue worse.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,328 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2516
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Sep 08, 2008 10:03 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #5

Even a cheap studio strobe will outdo a hotshoe speedlight

Despite the hoop-la of Strobist propaganda; virtually any studio type strobe will beat out a ***EX series hotshoe type speedlight for the uses you mentioned because:

1. Studio strobes are equipped with modeling lights. You cannot use the ***EX series strobes in the pseudo modeling fashion for any length of time because they will burn out.

2. Studio strobes will work well with light modifiers and will accept many different types. A studio strobe with reflector removed is far-far more efficient when using a softbox. If you put a softbox on a ***EX series speedlight, you are trying to diffuse light that has already been concentrated by a reflector. The studio strobe will not need all sorts of extra accessories in order to work with the light modifiers.

3. Most studio strobes are a LOT MORE POWERFUL than the ***Ex series speedlights.

4. Studio strobes have built-in sockets for mounting on light stands.

5. Studio strobes are equipped with built-in slaves.

6. The studio strobe usually is powered by AC current rather than little AA batteries (However, there are battery powered studio strobes). The AC current maintains a steady fast recycle time rather than the recycle period getting longer and longer as the batteries lose their power.

7. Many excellent studio strobes are a LOT LESS EXPENSIVE than the ***EX series speedlights.

If I wanted to haul gravel for my garden, I guess that I COULD fold down the back seat of a Toyota Corolla, cover it with a tarp and shovel in the gravel. However, this certainly would not be the best way to haul gravel. I would be a LOT BETTER OFF buying a pickup truck which was built for hauling things.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dermit
Goldmember
1,815 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 174
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Chandler, Arizona
     
Sep 08, 2008 10:47 |  #6

The whole idea behind strobist vs studio strobes is mainly the portability issue. For the photographer who shoots mostly on location on a limited schedule speedlights are the way to go most of the time. For the photographer who shoots mosty in their own space studio strobes are king. If you do both, owning both is a good thing.


5DmkII, 5DmkIII, 5DS R, 15mm, 16-35 f/2.8 II L, 100 Macro f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, 580EX II, 580EX, 550EX
http://www.pixelcraftp​hoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sfaust
Goldmember
Avatar
2,306 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2006
     
Sep 08, 2008 10:55 |  #7

I agree 100% with the above posts. I have a compelete studio strobe setup, and a lightweight setup consisting of 6 speedlights. The speedlights suffer all the drawbacks mentioned, but are wonderful when you want to travel real compact and light and still want the basic functionality of a multi-light setup. But I would always recommend the studio strobe over the speed light because they are more cost efficient and offer greater functionality. I would only recommend the speedlight route if portability is the primary concern and cost isn't an issue. Here is what I carry for my 6 speedlight setup Speedlight lighting kit (external link). I've added another speedlight and some other accessories, but it still fits in the small case shown. Very light, very portable, and pretty capable, but expensive in the end!


Stephen

Mix of digital still gear, Medium format to M4/3.
Canon EOS Cinema for video.
Commercial Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 08, 2008 10:55 |  #8

If I had a dedicated studio, I would use fan-cooled AC powered strobes. Since my work is 100% location, I use hot shoe flashes. I did not waste money on Speedlites though. They're a really poor value when you're setting your output manually, IMHO. I have five old Vivitars in my bag instead.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emre2006
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
57 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Sep 08, 2008 12:34 |  #9

Thanks for all the comments! Excellent advices. What I understand is I should just get a decent softbox + a cheaper 300WS strobe with a good stand and a good reflector and that should give me a good starting point.


Bodies: EOS30, EOS 40D, CONTAX 167 MT
Lenses: canon 70-200 f/4 L IS, carl zeiss 50mm 1.7, canon 50mm 1.8, 17-85 IS, 430EX
Other: Tripods and ball head by Benro, filters by Hoya, camera bag by Lowpro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fishingjts
Senior Member
Avatar
984 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
Sep 08, 2008 15:57 as a reply to  @ emre2006's post |  #10

well... i've used the beginner A/C strobes and have gotten nice results... HOWEVER... I have recently switched over to using a couple 430ex's and and an ST-E2. I get very acceptable results. The E-TTL and the ability to set the ratio on the ST-E2 makes setting things up a breeze. And being wireless comes in handy when trying to snap pictures of my 2 and 4 year old...

Here's a sample for a recent sitting:

IMAGE: http://www.johnnystacks.com/gallery/d/4170-1/IMG_2266.JPG

I fired off a number of shot in very quick succession with no apparent ill effects... The whole gallery is here: http://www.johnnystack​s.com …v/Family/Girls/​Cellphone/ (external link)

5D Mark II Gripped | 24-105L | 70-200L F2.8 IS II | 430EX | G16

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ugly_a
Senior Member
Avatar
406 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Sep 08, 2008 16:28 |  #11

awww..... cute. Is that a real cell phone.


Gear-lust-free since yesterday.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fishingjts
Senior Member
Avatar
984 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
Sep 08, 2008 16:52 |  #12

ugly_a wrote in post #6267084 (external link)
awww..... cute. Is that a real cell phone.

Thanks! It's here toy "Princess" phone... While it's not real, she sure did carry on a very animated conversation! LOL!

IMAGE: http://www.johnnystacks.com/gallery/d/4188-1/bailee_cell2.jpg

5D Mark II Gripped | 24-105L | 70-200L F2.8 IS II | 430EX | G16

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,328 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2516
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Sep 08, 2008 16:56 |  #13

Vivitars are great....

cdifoto wrote in post #6264996 (external link)
If I had a dedicated studio, I would use fan-cooled AC powered strobes. Since my work is 100% location, I use hot shoe flashes. I did not waste money on Speedlites though. They're a really poor value when you're setting your output manually, IMHO. I have five old Vivitars in my bag instead.

The 285 (series) Vivitar flashes are great units and can usually be had so cheap on eBay that it is almost amusing. There are also all sorts of accessories available (also very cheaply) such as filters, accessory battery packs and AC adapters.

The 285 (series) also use plastic battery trays/clips for the four AA batteries. having a second battery tray loaded with fresh batteries makes switching very easy.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
engsetr1
Senior Member
Avatar
439 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Central, NJ
     
Sep 08, 2008 17:02 |  #14

Quote:
Originally Posted by ugly_a
awww..... cute. Is that a real cell phone.

Thanks! It's here toy "Princess" phone... While it's not real, she sure did carry on a very animated conversation! LOL!


That is just TOO cute!


gear

http://debramckee.zenf​olio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,474 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Speedlite instead of strobe?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1128 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.