Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 08 Sep 2008 (Monday) 12:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Gitzo GM2541 or Gitzo GM3551?

 
lsquare
Goldmember
1,933 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 08, 2008 12:00 |  #1

The weight difference between these two monopods is not an issue for me. It seems like the difference between these two monopods is that the 3551 is taller when fully extended and have a larger weight capacity. I'm 5'8" tall and I'm not sure if the 3551 might be too tall for me to use. Maybe you guys can give me an input on that. If money wasn't a problem and you had the choice of these two monopods, which one would you get?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bubble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,382 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Yorba Linda , CA
     
Sep 08, 2008 12:15 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

GM3551 ofcourse.


Canon 5D II, 7D | 16-35L II | 24-70L | 24-105L | 50L | 85L II |  iMac 27 | Redrock Micro DSLR Cinema Bundle | Elinchrom Ranger RX-AS Kit| Elinchrom Digital Style 1200RX/600RX | Turbo SC |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,320 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Sep 08, 2008 12:23 |  #3

Thinking outside the box, I would suggest you look at the GM5541. It will be the last monopod you will buy. I switched over to it from a Manfrotto 680 and I wished I had done it much much sooner. Here is a review of it: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …Fiber-Monopod-Review.aspx (external link)


Jim

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Sep 08, 2008 12:28 |  #4

Sgt_Strider wrote in post #6265396 (external link)
which one would you get?

The longer one.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Sep 08, 2008 22:38 |  #5

Remember, you can make the tall monopod shorter but you can't make the short monopod taller. I have the 3550 (same as 3551), and I use 4 sections until I need the last leg. That last leg can become handy, such as shooting atop a chair over crowds of people or having to shoot on a downslope, etc. etc.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Sep 08, 2008 23:52 |  #6

Personally I didnt feel I would ever need anything stronger than the 2 series monopod, but depending on what lenses you intend to buy in the future or already have... that would be the determining factor.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CS ­ TAN
Member
43 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Sep 09, 2008 02:56 as a reply to  @ ben_r_'s post |  #7

I agree with SYS. If you use ladder to shoot, that extra length will come in handy.

For most people, 2 series is good enough but 3 series will give you a bit more flexibility if the weight is not an issue.

A 5 series? :lol:


Canon 5D Mk II | EF 24-105L | EF 35L | EF 85L Mk II | EF 135L | 580EXII+430EX | Samyang 14mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Sep 09, 2008 08:37 |  #8

By the way, I bought the 3550 before getting the grip for my 40D, and am I GLAD that I have the 3 series monopod as the load is extra heavier with the grip and extra battery. The 5 series is of course better for the weight tolerance, but it's shorter than the 3 series.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Sep 09, 2008 09:04 |  #9

SYS wrote in post #6271520 (external link)
By the way, I bought the 3550 before getting the grip for my 40D, and am I GLAD that I have the 3 series monopod as the load is extra heavier with the grip and extra battery. The 5 series is of course better for the weight tolerance, but it's shorter than the 3 series.

With the GM2541 holding a max of 26+lbs I am 100% sure youd have been MORE than fine with the 2 series... A gripped 40D with two batterys, 70-200mm 2.8 IS lens attached w/ hood and a 580EX II on top with Better Beamer only weighs just under 9lbs. The 3 series is more for those with lenses like the 300 or 400 2.8 IS or larger and even some of those might be okay on a 2 series.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Sep 09, 2008 11:45 |  #10

ben_r_ wrote in post #6271706 (external link)
With the GM2541 holding a max of 26+lbs I am 100% sure youd have been MORE than fine with the 2 series... A gripped 40D with two batterys, 70-200mm 2.8 IS lens attached w/ hood and a 580EX II on top with Better Beamer only weighs just under 9lbs. The 3 series is more for those with lenses like the 300 or 400 2.8 IS or larger and even some of those might be okay on a 2 series.

When I was researching on which monopod to purchase, I did all the weight configurations and calculations, AS WELL AS which lenses I will be adding in the future. Whenever I purchase something, I always think about the future equipment growth -- especially when you're getting something as expensive as the Gitzo stick!! I'm planning on getting the 500mm, and although ON PAPER the 2 series might be enough even for such lens, I much prefer to have a plenty of "psychological comfort" of knowing that the product will do the job. So out with the 2 series for me. Now, as for the 5 series.... three things I didn't care for... 1) overkill for my needs, 2) don't care for the feeling of holding a tree trunk, and 3) shorter height than the 3 series... But this is of course entirely personal and subjective -- just me. :)



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,647 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Gitzo GM2541 or Gitzo GM3551?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2705 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.