Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 10 Sep 2008 (Wednesday) 15:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ST-E2... why get one?

 
funk1196
Senior Member
Avatar
338 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: San Francisco
     
Sep 10, 2008 15:07 |  #1

I don't understand why the st-e2 exists... why not just get another 430ex? theyre damn near the same price... and as far as i know, they do the same exact thing (you can just turn off the flash on the 430 and use it as a transmitter only)

is there any advantage to getting an st-e2 that a 430ex doesn't have? the price difference seems to be about $25

also, a side question.... can canon's wireless signal go through a speedlite with a diffuser cap on it (sto-fen, etc.)?


5D II, 16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100mm f/2.8 macro.
T1i, 10-22mm, 17-55mm.
580EX II, 430EX II, ST-E2, EF 2X II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ Beck
Goldmember
2,503 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
     
Sep 10, 2008 15:09 |  #2

The signal doesnt go through the flash tube, it goes through a infared emitter on the bottom of the flash on the front.


Gear List? My gear is bigger than yours? Just shoot have fun...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Sep 10, 2008 15:09 |  #3

Yes, a HUGE one.... The 430EX CAN NOT act as a master and therefore CAN NOT control other flashes. It can only be a slave flash.

Also many people like to use the ST-E2 as an AF assist light for auto focusing in very low light.

Also this thread should be in the Flash and Lighting section.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick ­ Pro
Goldmember
Avatar
1,084 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
Location: South Jersey
     
Sep 10, 2008 15:10 |  #4

the 430 cannot act as a master. having a stofen on will not do anything, as to the infered part is that red thing at the bottom.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
funk1196
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
338 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: San Francisco
     
Sep 10, 2008 15:14 |  #5

oops, is there a way i can put it in the flash thread?

okay so lets say i use the 580 as my on camera flash, and a 430 out to the side, if i have a flash tube on my 580... will the wireless still work?

the 580 manual says the transmitter is in the flash head


5D II, 16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100mm f/2.8 macro.
T1i, 10-22mm, 17-55mm.
580EX II, 430EX II, ST-E2, EF 2X II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Sep 10, 2008 15:17 |  #6

funk1196 wrote in post #6281251 (external link)
oops, is there a way i can put it in the flash thread?

okay so lets say i use the 580 as my on camera flash, and a 430 out to the side, if i have a flash tube on my 580... will the wireless still work?

the 580 manual says the transmitter is in the flash head

Yes the 580 will still control the 430. The IR beam comes out of the red plastic area on the front of the flash unit and anything over the flash light itself will not hinder the IR communication.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Franko515
"doped up on pills"
Avatar
2,478 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Crete, Illinois
     
Sep 10, 2008 15:19 as a reply to  @ ben_r_'s post |  #7

The ST-E2 is a cheaper option than the 580EX series I & II, thats the reason people get it.


Light, composition, shooting technique matter to the end quality most. -Pekka
My Flickr Gallery (external link)
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ipschoser1
Senior Member
497 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Sep 10, 2008 15:29 as a reply to  @ Franko515's post |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

Other than the previously stated fact that the 430 isn't a master flash, the ST-E2 offers a handier package than a 550 or 580 being on the camera all the time. It also allows off camera use of all the speedlights a photog might own.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/district_histor​y_fan/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Franko515
"doped up on pills"
Avatar
2,478 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Crete, Illinois
     
Sep 10, 2008 15:40 |  #9

ipschoser1 wrote in post #6281351 (external link)
Other than the previously stated fact that the 430 isn't a master flash, the ST-E2 offers a handier package than a 550 or 580 being on the camera all the time. It also allows off camera use of all the speedlights a photog might own.

As far a function goes, you get more function from a 580EX than you do from the ST-E2. The 580EX allows for three groups while the ST-E2 only allows for two, and you get another light using the 580EX.

IMO the main reason people choose the ST-E2 over the 580EX series is cost


Light, composition, shooting technique matter to the end quality most. -Pekka
My Flickr Gallery (external link)
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
funk1196
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
338 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: San Francisco
     
Sep 10, 2008 16:08 |  #10

is it possible to set ratios with the st-e2 like i can if i have a 580exii on camera? (flash A 1:1, flash B 1:4.... or however that works)


5D II, 16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100mm f/2.8 macro.
T1i, 10-22mm, 17-55mm.
580EX II, 430EX II, ST-E2, EF 2X II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
motion_projekt
Goldmember
Avatar
2,469 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Sep 10, 2008 16:19 |  #11

funk1196 wrote in post #6281251 (external link)
okay so lets say i use the 580 as my on camera flash, and a 430 out to the side, if i have a flash tube on my 580... will the wireless still work?

the 580 manual says the transmitter is in the flash head

o_O if you;re going to slave flashes, why would you want to have an oo camera flash (OnCF.) OnCF makes the image so flat and does do that great a job of separating the subject from background.

just my humble opinion.


EOS 5Dmk3x2 | 24L | 50L | 135L
Instagram (external link) | Gear | SportsShooter (external link) | Portfolio (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Sep 10, 2008 16:20 |  #12

motion_projekt wrote in post #6281644 (external link)
o_O if you;re going to slave flashes, why would you want to have an oo camera flash (OnCF.) OnCF makes the image so flat and does do that great a job of separating the subject from background.

just my humble opinion.

Sometimes you want a little catch light in the eyes or you need to open up shadows under a hat, etc...


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Sep 10, 2008 16:30 |  #13

FYI - that red panel on the front of your flash unit is the focus assist emitter, not an IR emitter.

motion_projekt wrote in post #6281644 (external link)
o_O if you;re going to slave flashes, why would you want to have an oo camera flash (OnCF.) OnCF makes the image so flat and does do that great a job of separating the subject from background.

just my humble opinion.

Sometimes you want a little fill from the camera too. It doesn't have to be the main light.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
funk1196
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
338 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: San Francisco
     
Sep 10, 2008 16:53 |  #14

so.. again.. according to the manual. the wireless transmitter is in the flash head, not the red panels.
will it work through a diffuser.. and if so, how much is the range limited by?


5D II, 16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100mm f/2.8 macro.
T1i, 10-22mm, 17-55mm.
580EX II, 430EX II, ST-E2, EF 2X II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Franko515
"doped up on pills"
Avatar
2,478 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Crete, Illinois
     
Sep 10, 2008 17:04 |  #15

funk1196 wrote in post #6281862 (external link)
so.. again.. according to the manual. the wireless transmitter is in the flash head, not the red panels.
will it work through a diffuser.. and if so, how much is the range limited by?

with something like a stofen yes, with a softbox or umbrella it will be hit or miss. Indoors it works well with a shoot through umbrella or with no diffuser at all. Outdoor its kind of a pain to use thats when the units definatly must face each other and the range is limited, thats when i switch to the PW


Light, composition, shooting technique matter to the end quality most. -Pekka
My Flickr Gallery (external link)
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,139 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
ST-E2... why get one?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2873 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.