Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 11 Sep 2008 (Thursday) 05:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Portfolio: please have a look!

 
JPM ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 11, 2008 05:10 |  #1

I had to put together a portfolio of my shots and I would like any criticism that you may have; good, bad, or indifferent.

http://www.flickr.com …5/sets/72157607​228585243/ (external link)

Thanks

Here is one, look at the others Please.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


60D gripped, T2i gripped, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Pentax SMC 50 f/1.4, Nikon Standard Speed Set: 24, 35, 85, 105, 135, 180, Canon 580ex, Calumet Genesis 200
jpmphotovideo.com (external link)
Please check out my film resume (external link) and contact me if you need a DP, AC, or PA for an Atlanta-based shoot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
klynam
Goldmember
Avatar
1,237 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Photopolis
     
Sep 11, 2008 09:35 |  #2

Your most interesting shots (in that set) are

1 (creek)
24 (poker chips - but too dark)
20 (candle girl)
12 (flower girl)
11 (luminaries)
9 (column)
8 (flower)
7 (stairs)
2 (sun in clouds)
10 (purple girl)

All except no.1 the creek) should have the overall levels adjusted - they are too dark (at least on my screen) and need more snap.

The rest are just snapshots and do you no favors. Delete them.

JMHO


Canon Cameras & Lenses | Masterworks Photography (external link) | God is Light
"Until you can do better, copy." Tony Gresham

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Sep 11, 2008 10:22 as a reply to  @ klynam's post |  #3

#18, you have sensor dust that needs to be retouched?

They are nicely done. I do like the last shot of the sun in the clouds the best out of the series.


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JPM ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 11, 2008 12:26 |  #4

thanks for the suggestions. Will make changes accordingly.


60D gripped, T2i gripped, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Pentax SMC 50 f/1.4, Nikon Standard Speed Set: 24, 35, 85, 105, 135, 180, Canon 580ex, Calumet Genesis 200
jpmphotovideo.com (external link)
Please check out my film resume (external link) and contact me if you need a DP, AC, or PA for an Atlanta-based shoot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walczak ­ Photo
Goldmember
1,034 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 12, 2008 10:31 |  #5

Over all I think you have a pretty good eye for composition. The single biggest thing I'm seeing is a lack of consistency with the exposures...several of the shots look rather dark. My first question here would be, do you have your monitor properly calibrated? As some of these shots are correct and some of them aren't, I would also ask...are you perhaps doing your editing at different times of the day under different room lighting conditions? Image #12 for example looks pretty close, but #22 and 23 look too dark. Also, I'd go back on those two and take down the highlights a bit (looked like the model was sweating or something).

Also in regards to specific shots, image #3 really doesn't do anything for me at all...there's really no central subject to give the shot weight. Same thing applies to #15 as well. I really wouldn't include those two in a portfolio. I'm also not really crazy about #13...kind of makes me think "huh?". #12 is usable, but it's -way- too dark and you have the horizon too close to the middle of the image...remember the rule of thirds here! I'd go back and do more editing on that one. To me #6 really looks like an average tourist snap shot taken from a "scenic over-look" in a park somewhere...sorry, but there's nothing really special about that shot at all.

This is just my opinion here obviously, but to me your forte seems to be with the people shots, so I would put more emphasis on those for your portfolio...depending of course on the intent of the portfolio...a portfolio should always be purpose driven. A portfolio should reflect your best work...not just the shots that are actually "in focus". Exposure, composition, over-all aesthetics of the shot, etc., are all issues that should be considered when selecting shots for a portfolio. Remember, your portfolio is, for all intensive purposes, your "resume"...the idea is to show people (or potential clients) exactly what you're capable of...and those people are going to make judgments, good or bad, based on what they're seeing very quickly. More over, if you have even -1- bad picture out of 20 otherwise excellent shots, that one single bad shot is the shot folks are going to remember. As the old saying goes, "people never notice a salesman with clean finger nails, but they always remember the one with dirty finger nails".

You do have some nice stuff here, but you also have some stuff that's really just "so-so" at best and even some of the better shots still need some more post processing. If these were just snap shots or mementos it wouldn't be a big a deal but as you said these are for a portfolio, I would certainly address these issues.

Just my $.02 worth,
Jim


"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
Walczak Photography - www.walczakphoto.izfre​e.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bumgardnern
Senior Member
977 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Nashvegas
     
Sep 12, 2008 16:02 |  #6

You have some nice photos in your portfolio. I would definaentley take into account the criticism offered by the other posters they are very much spot on when talking about your exposure.

My advice is for you to think carefully about the target of your portfolio. Right now your portfolio is not telling me much of a story and is not very cohesive for the number of pictures that are included. Be very careful about every portfolio you put togeather and custom tailor it to the client that you are approaching.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

899 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Portfolio: please have a look!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2719 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.