Mara modeled for me last weekend and this is one from her set. Let me know what you think.
Thanks.
![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
Sep 11, 2008 15:08 | #1 Mara modeled for me last weekend and this is one from her set. Let me know what you think.
Website: http://www.landisphotographic.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2008 15:38 | #2 a bit underexposed...and i think it would have been better if she was looking at the camera t5i with kit lens, Canon Nifty Fifty, Sigma 530 super, Nikon SB-24(2), Canon 40mm f2.8, Canon 28-135 IS, Tokina 11-16mm f2.8, Canon 70-200 f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2008 15:43 | #3 It's not underexposed. I wanted an edgier look, so the stairs have been darkened a bit. She is the subject matter. Is she under exposed? Website: http://www.landisphotographic.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jennyphotog Member 65 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Sep 11, 2008 15:54 | #4 Permanent banher shoes stand out more than anything else to me, if the stairs were maybe darkened more she would probably pop more.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mjvincent Senior Member 650 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Waxhachie Texas More info | Sep 11, 2008 16:08 | #5 It may be the compression for posting but the picture does not seem tack sharp, it doesn't pop out there, it seems (lacking other words) bland. I would look for something else (crop, pp, curves etc) to make it stand out. Mike Jones aka mjvincent
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2008 16:40 | #6 there are more from the shoot at http://www.brian-landis.com/mara.html Website: http://www.landisphotographic.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shannyD "...in too much trouble" 5,219 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit. More info | Sep 11, 2008 16:45 | #7 i think your work is nice. but on some of your images.. i feel that you went too heavy on the vignette or something.. because on one of the photos it runs over her face, and kind of flattens her.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonyr0584 Senior Member 844 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Mississippi More info | Sep 11, 2008 16:48 | #8 Checked out your other shots from this session..... I believe you probably posted the worst picture here, of course you may have meant to do that. You have some really good ones in the set. Try posting a few of the better ones here. A lot of folks refuse to follow links and are just skimming through these threads. http://www.trphotography.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2008 16:55 | #9 Thanks for the feedback. If you don't mind my asking...which ones did you like and why? It is hard to tell what the appeal of the images are to people and want to get a feel for what most people like. Website: http://www.landisphotographic.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2008 17:57 | #10 How about this one...
Website: http://www.landisphotographic.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2008 17:59 | #11 Or this one...
Website: http://www.landisphotographic.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
leninglass Goldmember 1,581 posts Likes: 15 Joined Nov 2007 Location: OKC, USA More info | Sep 11, 2008 18:51 | #12 These look great. But it seems your processing is flattening out the image. I dont think you over did your processing -- just maybe you passed through them too quickly. Canon 5D Mark III x2 - 14mm Mark II f/2.8 L II - 24 L II - 35mm f/1.4 L - 50mm f/1.2 L II - 70-200 f/2.8 L II IS - 100L Macro - 600EX-RT x3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2008 19:19 | #13 I don't know what you mean. These have very little if any processing on the faces, so what do you mean I passed through them too quickly? I just want to understand what you think they are missing or what you don't like about them. Maybe they were over-lit? I am using some strobist type setups and just started into that realm. Am I putting too much light on them? Website: http://www.landisphotographic.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
leninglass Goldmember 1,581 posts Likes: 15 Joined Nov 2007 Location: OKC, USA More info | Sep 13, 2008 02:11 | #14 Don't get me wrong, your pictures look great. specially the last 2. They are well lit. but if you look at Canon 5D Mark III x2 - 14mm Mark II f/2.8 L II - 24 L II - 35mm f/1.4 L - 50mm f/1.2 L II - 70-200 f/2.8 L II IS - 100L Macro - 600EX-RT x3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 859 guests, 116 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||