do any of you all have any recommendations? i don't want to spend an arm and a leg

mep42 Senior Member 519 posts Joined Aug 2008 Location: Charlotte NC More info | Sep 11, 2008 16:25 | #1 do any of you all have any recommendations? i don't want to spend an arm and a leg Looking for 60d, PM with what you have!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JWright Planes, trains and ham radio... 18,399 posts Likes: 35 Joined Dec 2004 More info | Sep 11, 2008 17:15 | #2 What lens are you going to be using on the camera? Monopods don't gain you much in the way of steadiness, but are used more for supporting the weight of a heavy lens, like a 400mm f2.8 or larger... John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jptsr1 Goldmember 1,846 posts Gallery: 4 photos Likes: 116 Joined Sep 2006 Location: From The Bronx NY but living in Singapore More info | Sep 11, 2008 17:22 | #3 JWright wrote in post #6288693 What lens are you going to be using on the camera? Monopods don't gain you much in the way of steadiness, but are used more for supporting the weight of a heavy lens, like a 400mm f2.8 or larger... i humbly and respectfully disagree. I am quite a bit more steady with a monopod on a longer lens then without. even with my 70-200 which isn't heavy at all there is a noticeable difference. could be due to my utter lack of form but whatever the case i get more keepers with a monopod. that being said its no substitute for a tripod. Et Facta Est Lux
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jptsr1 Goldmember 1,846 posts Gallery: 4 photos Likes: 116 Joined Sep 2006 Location: From The Bronx NY but living in Singapore More info | Sep 11, 2008 17:37 | #4 mep42 wrote in post #6288444 do any of you all have any recommendations? i don't want to spend an arm and a leg ![]() ![]() i have the Manfrotto 681B with 486RC2 Ballhead. its a pretty robust combination but it was a good compromise as far as price goes. i want to say the combination was like 90 bucks or so but i cant remember. if i had the extra coin i probably would have gone with a carbon fiber one to save the weight. Also the 486 head is good for medium size lenses like 70-200's and similar but if you get something longer (read bigger) you should probably go with one of those tilt brackets instead of a ball head. when I've rented bigger lenses my ballhead has given me problems. Et Facta Est Lux
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RPCrowe Cream of the Crop More info | I also like the Manfrotto 681 or 681B See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 11, 2008 20:33 | #6 No matter what the weight of your gear, I think monopod should be an essential part of your set up. If you happen to be shooting in the lowlight or poorly lit indoors without an IS lens, your monopod will provide that extra stability to make a huge difference. Having said that, the CHOICE of your monopod should be based on how much weight you intend to place on top of it, as well as how long you'd like it to last...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familiaphoto Goldmember 3,948 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Sep 11, 2008 21:20 | #7 Take a look at the Manfrotto 680B. Very popular around here and affordable as well at around 60 bucks. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SMP_Homer Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 12, 2008 08:39 | #8 Manfrotto 681 here... great for 70-200s, 100-400... no head, yet... EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Sep 12, 2008 09:53 | #9 For maximum versatility at a moderate price, I chose and use the Manfrotto 680B monopod topped off with their 486RC2 ball head. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2691 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||