Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 11 Sep 2008 (Thursday) 21:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best Tripod for $50-100?

 
DDWD10
Goldmember
Avatar
1,676 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: College Station, TX
     
Sep 11, 2008 21:17 |  #1

Can anyone recommend anything? I currently have an old Velbon DF-40 tripod that is basic and not quite sturdy enough for my equipment these days.


30D | X-Pro1 | X10 | Q
EF-S 18-55mm IS | XF 35mm f/1.4 R | Q 5-15mm f/2.8-4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 552
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Sep 11, 2008 21:36 |  #2

hehehehehe, some or most people starting with this tripod then upgrade immediately, this company should produce new economic tripods but good enough quality.

I think you should look into Manfrotto tripods, there are many you can choose of, if you want something good but so cheap then look at Manfrotto 190XPROB models with head like 488RC2, if you can add little more bucks then go with 055XPROB+488RC2, there are another heads can be cheaper maybe, for example i have 804RC2.

Good luck.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Sep 12, 2008 07:34 |  #3

DDWD10 wrote in post #6290004 (external link)
Can anyone recommend anything? I currently have an old Velbon DF-40 tripod that is basic and not quite sturdy enough for my equipment these days.

Other than finding a lucky buy in the used-equipment market, it's my opinion that you will not find anything in the price range you have in the thread title worth using.

Increase your budget to the $150 to $300 (US) range and there will be a lot of worthwhile choices available to you.

If you cannot afford the budget increase for now, you could buy or make a bean bag or something like that which would give you a very solid base for your camera, though it would not be as versatile as a good tripod.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MattMoore
Goldmember
Avatar
1,839 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX - USA
     
Sep 12, 2008 07:43 |  #4

Dynatran by Amvona.....they have some really nice ones you can snag on eBay on the cheap.

My tripod/head setup is less than $100 and beefier than most $300 setups I've seen.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDWD10
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,676 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: College Station, TX
     
Sep 12, 2008 09:37 |  #5

Hmm... I think I'll stick it out with my Velbon for a while longer and then maybe try some out at the Camera Exchange. I'm not ready to spend $100-300 on a tripod yet.

What I really need is a new computer! ANyone want my Mac mini G4? :lol:


30D | X-Pro1 | X10 | Q
EF-S 18-55mm IS | XF 35mm f/1.4 R | Q 5-15mm f/2.8-4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shannyD
"...in too much trouble"
Avatar
5,219 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit.
     
Sep 12, 2008 09:55 |  #6

http://www.amvona.com …ge&view=1&produ​ct_id=2647 (external link)

this looks like the best bang for the buck. it holds 7.7 lbs.. and its just under 80dollars. within your budget. it will hold your set up.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDWD10
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,676 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: College Station, TX
     
Sep 12, 2008 10:13 |  #7

shannyD wrote in post #6292885 (external link)
http://www.amvona.com …ge&view=1&produ​ct_id=2647 (external link)

this looks like the best bang for the buck. it holds 7.7 lbs.. and its just under 80dollars. within your budget. it will hold your set up.

Tempting... anywhere I can try it out before I buy it? Ritz, Camera Exchange, etc?


30D | X-Pro1 | X10 | Q
EF-S 18-55mm IS | XF 35mm f/1.4 R | Q 5-15mm f/2.8-4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shannyD
"...in too much trouble"
Avatar
5,219 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit.
     
Sep 12, 2008 10:36 |  #8

i have no clue.. i figure if you dont like it.. you can return it.?

i dont have many places around myself either to be able to try stuff out.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDWD10
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,676 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: College Station, TX
     
Sep 12, 2008 10:38 |  #9

It sure had some great reviews on that site. I think I may go ahead and buy it :) Thanks for your help!


30D | X-Pro1 | X10 | Q
EF-S 18-55mm IS | XF 35mm f/1.4 R | Q 5-15mm f/2.8-4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shannyD
"...in too much trouble"
Avatar
5,219 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit.
     
Sep 12, 2008 10:41 |  #10

thank nw85887. he put it out there.. i just looked it up because im in the market for a new tripod. i purchased a manfrotto one a few weeks ago. and i do like it.. but i didnt realize my gear is almost too heavy for it. lol.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Sep 12, 2008 11:57 |  #11

shannyD wrote in post #6292885 (external link)
http://www.amvona.com …ge&view=1&produ​ct_id=2647 (external link)

this looks like the best bang for the buck. it holds 7.7 lbs.. and its just under 80dollars. within your budget. it will hold your set up.

Just because a tripod is rated to "hold" 7.7 pounds (or whatever the weight rating is) does in no way mean that it will hold it in a steady fashion. All it means is that it won't collapse under the weight.

Before spending good money on a cheap tripod, it would really pay to physically test whatever you have in mind to purchase.

Mount your camera with the longest/heaviest lens you own on the tripod you want to test. Then, while looking through the viewfinder, rap on the end of the lens. Watch for how much movement there is and how long it takes to settle out to steady. Do this with different tripods and you will quickly learn that there are HUGE differences between the "cheapie" tripods and decent ones.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shannyD
"...in too much trouble"
Avatar
5,219 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit.
     
Sep 12, 2008 11:58 |  #12

SkipD wrote in post #6293622 (external link)
Just because a tripod is rated to "hold" 7.7 pounds (or whatever the weight rating is) does in no way mean that it will hold it in a steady fashion. All it means is that it won't collapse under the weight.

Before spending good money on a cheap tripod, it would really pay to physically test whatever you have in mind to purchase.

Mount your camera with the longest/heaviest lens you own on the tripod you want to test. Then, while looking through the viewfinder, rap on the end of the lens. Watch for how much movement there is and how long it takes to settle out to steady. Do this with different tripods and you will quickly learn that there are HUGE differences between the "cheapie" tripods and decent ones.

yeah you are right about that.. i totally forgot about that.

my bad.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Sep 12, 2008 12:00 |  #13

I have found that for me to be satisfied with a tripod/head combination, it will more than likely be rated to "hold" about three times the actual weight of the equipment (or more) that I intend to put on it.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Sep 12, 2008 19:34 |  #14

Under $100? Slik 790DX.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Sep 12, 2008 20:15 |  #15

Some reviews and tips in the sticky:
-=FAQ=- Choosing a Tripod, How too and Reviews.

From that list, Benro or Feisol might fit the budget.
Other options (not all in budget): Slik, Amvona, Velbon El Carmagne, Manfrotto.

Although I agree with Skip that "you get what you pay for".


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,577 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Best Tripod for $50-100?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2688 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.