Can anyone recommend anything? I currently have an old Velbon DF-40 tripod that is basic and not quite sturdy enough for my equipment these days.
DDWD10 Goldmember 1,676 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: College Station, TX More info | Sep 11, 2008 21:17 | #1 Can anyone recommend anything? I currently have an old Velbon DF-40 tripod that is basic and not quite sturdy enough for my equipment these days. 30D | X-Pro1 | X10 | Q
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Sep 11, 2008 21:36 | #2 hehehehehe, some or most people starting with this tripod then upgrade immediately, this company should produce new economic tripods but good enough quality. Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Sep 12, 2008 07:34 | #3 DDWD10 wrote in post #6290004 Can anyone recommend anything? I currently have an old Velbon DF-40 tripod that is basic and not quite sturdy enough for my equipment these days. Other than finding a lucky buy in the used-equipment market, it's my opinion that you will not find anything in the price range you have in the thread title worth using. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MattMoore Goldmember 1,839 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2007 Location: San Antonio, TX - USA More info | Sep 12, 2008 07:43 | #4 Dynatran by Amvona.....they have some really nice ones you can snag on eBay on the cheap.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 12, 2008 09:37 | #5 Hmm... I think I'll stick it out with my Velbon for a while longer and then maybe try some out at the Camera Exchange. I'm not ready to spend $100-300 on a tripod yet. 30D | X-Pro1 | X10 | Q
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shannyD "...in too much trouble" 5,219 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit. More info | Sep 12, 2008 09:55 | #6 http://www.amvona.com …ge&view=1&product_id=2647
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 12, 2008 10:13 | #7 shannyD wrote in post #6292885 http://www.amvona.com …ge&view=1&product_id=2647 this looks like the best bang for the buck. it holds 7.7 lbs.. and its just under 80dollars. within your budget. it will hold your set up. Tempting... anywhere I can try it out before I buy it? Ritz, Camera Exchange, etc? 30D | X-Pro1 | X10 | Q
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shannyD "...in too much trouble" 5,219 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit. More info | Sep 12, 2008 10:36 | #8 i have no clue.. i figure if you dont like it.. you can return it.?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 12, 2008 10:38 | #9 It sure had some great reviews on that site. I think I may go ahead and buy it 30D | X-Pro1 | X10 | Q
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shannyD "...in too much trouble" 5,219 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit. More info | Sep 12, 2008 10:41 | #10 thank nw85887. he put it out there.. i just looked it up because im in the market for a new tripod. i purchased a manfrotto one a few weeks ago. and i do like it.. but i didnt realize my gear is almost too heavy for it. lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Sep 12, 2008 11:57 | #11 shannyD wrote in post #6292885 http://www.amvona.com …ge&view=1&product_id=2647 this looks like the best bang for the buck. it holds 7.7 lbs.. and its just under 80dollars. within your budget. it will hold your set up. Just because a tripod is rated to "hold" 7.7 pounds (or whatever the weight rating is) does in no way mean that it will hold it in a steady fashion. All it means is that it won't collapse under the weight. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shannyD "...in too much trouble" 5,219 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit. More info | Sep 12, 2008 11:58 | #12 SkipD wrote in post #6293622 Just because a tripod is rated to "hold" 7.7 pounds (or whatever the weight rating is) does in no way mean that it will hold it in a steady fashion. All it means is that it won't collapse under the weight. Before spending good money on a cheap tripod, it would really pay to physically test whatever you have in mind to purchase. Mount your camera with the longest/heaviest lens you own on the tripod you want to test. Then, while looking through the viewfinder, rap on the end of the lens. Watch for how much movement there is and how long it takes to settle out to steady. Do this with different tripods and you will quickly learn that there are HUGE differences between the "cheapie" tripods and decent ones. yeah you are right about that.. i totally forgot about that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Sep 12, 2008 12:00 | #13 I have found that for me to be satisfied with a tripod/head combination, it will more than likely be rated to "hold" about three times the actual weight of the equipment (or more) that I intend to put on it. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jr_senator Goldmember 4,861 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Sep 12, 2008 19:34 | #14 Under $100? Slik 790DX.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Sep 12, 2008 20:15 | #15 Some reviews and tips in the sticky: "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2688 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||