Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 14 Sep 2008 (Sunday) 18:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Laser Vision Correction and the Photographer

 
Tragerman
Senior Member
Avatar
377 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: USA, Maryland
     
Sep 14, 2008 18:34 |  #1

I'm considering laser vision correction. I've been near sighted all my life. I'm now 53 and of course have presbyopia as well- need bi/vari-focal lenses for reading. After surgery, I'll need reading glasses, and may need them to see the controls of the camera.

I'm wondering if anyone else who shoots professionally, full or part time has had this treatment, and how it affected your shooting. How long was it before you could reasonably attempt a wedding (or other demanding event), if you had any negative effects I should be aware of, and would you do it again?

Thanks for your consideration.

Mickey


http://tragerman.smugm​ug.com/ (external link)Canon 20D x2, Canon 10-22, Canon 70-200 2.8 L IS USM; Canon 17-55/2.8 IS USM, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Canon 28-135 IS, Canon 75-300 III USM (for sale), Canon D60 IR modified. 580EX, Sigma 500 DG Super. Save $5 on a Smug Mug membership - use this link: http://www.smugmug.com​/?referrer=TnVhKJgoJK8​gQ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
noxcuses1
Senior Member
889 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
     
Sep 14, 2008 23:21 |  #2

I've had LASIK about 6 years ago, and I went from being 20/200 vision (almost legally blind) to 20/10, perfect vision.

I've been very happy with my results. I didn't have presbyopia.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustMyLuck
Member
244 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Sep 15, 2008 07:20 |  #3

I got my done about 2 years ago. I got 20/20 vision but before, I was nearly blind without my glasses. I still at times wear glasses just to make sure that the focus with the camera is sharp. I am not a professional but I do enjoy shooting alot. It's just a serious hobby for me. Don't wait too long because the older you get, more chances that the eye sugery might not make a difference. I got my done at age 35 and I hope I get 10years of eye glass freedom before old age sets in and my eyes will start to change. I believe that will start to change at the averge age of 45. Good luck.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adam8080
Goldmember
Avatar
2,280 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
     
Sep 15, 2008 10:29 |  #4

I'm also interested in the replies! I've just started thinking about getting this done as well.


Huntsville Real Estate Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ G
I feel thoroughly satisfied
Avatar
12,255 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Australia.
     
Sep 15, 2008 10:32 |  #5

I'm considering this... it's really quite a lot easier to shoot with contacts as you can get your eye that much closer to the viewfinder. The 1D's viewfinder is much easier for those with glasses but even so...


Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios​.com.au (external link) Reviews & Hotlinks: Domke F-3x - Pelican 1510/1514 (external link) & 1610/1614 (external link) - DIY Variable Length OC-E3 - Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home (external link) - FA-100 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BaliHai
Member
Avatar
209 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: PA
     
Sep 15, 2008 10:46 |  #6

I had PRK about five years ago (similar to Lasik but used for extremely near sighted people) I was at that time a -11 and a -10 in other words severely handicapped in the sight area. The eye doctor I went to did extensive testing and corrected my eyes so that I only have glasses for driving at night (they are not necessary but they cut glare and sharpen things abit) and no glasses for reading and close work. The reason I have no problem with reading is that one eye was corrected for close work and the other for distance. I have no problem using my camera and don't miss my glasses or contacts.


Canon 5D and 20D, 70-200mm f2.8L, 24-70mm f2.8L,
35-80mm, 70-210mm, 18-55mm, 85mm f/1.8, 135mm f/2L
lightmeter, tripod, studio lights

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zansho
"I'd kill for a hot pink 40D"
Avatar
2,547 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 800
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Austin, Tx
     
Sep 15, 2008 11:06 |  #7

I'm considering it. One issue is how much I rely on my eyesight - I'm deaf, and thus rely on my eyes for everything regarding communication.

My main worry is ... "what if the docs screw up, and I never see again?"

I know the chances of it happening are pretty damn small, but still. I'll probably invest in a Mark series body sometime down the road, even though my 5D's viewfinder is pretty darn bright and clear for me.


http://www.michaeljsam​aripa.com (external link) creating beautiful images for myself, my clients, and the world. Shooting with a mix of Canon, Fuji, and Sony.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS_JD
Goldmember
2,925 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland
     
Sep 15, 2008 11:26 as a reply to  @ Zansho's post |  #8

I got mine done around 6 or 7 years ago.

I was -5 and couldn't see beyond about 6" in front of me. At the time I did not have a camera so that was not my reson for doing so.

I looked at the various riks and asked a few questions (do some research on the web).

There were a couple of scare stories going around but I actually believe that these were down to the patients not following the post op procedures and using the appropriate drops that prevent infection.

There is obviously a very slight risk of infection but there has NEVER been a case of blindness in any laser vision study carried out since the 90s.

Other risks include

Dryness - Drops that the optician provided helped with this for a few weeks after the op. Rarely a problem beyond that. Some people may find they need the drops for a few months.

Hazy vision in dim light - I had that for a week after the op but cleared up quickly.

Night glare (halo's around bright light at night) seems to be common. it usually occurs after every LASIK procedure but clears up quiclky but there are stories of people having this permanently. it's never really been an issue although sometimes if it's a very bright light i do seem to get this effect.....

To be honest I'd recommend it. Best thing I've done. Glasses were just a pain and the freedom to be able to see in the swimming baths, in the rain not standing or sitting on them and having to pay more money!!

LASIK can be expensive - don't believe the £300 per eye rubbish..... that gets you in and interested.... but it is still worth it from a lifestyle point of view.

Good luck :)


All My Gear
5D MkIII & 5D MKII + Grips | 24-70 f2.8L IS | 24-105 f4L IS | 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f1.8 | 100 f2.8 | 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scokar
Goldmember
Avatar
1,080 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
     
Sep 15, 2008 13:46 |  #9

"night glare"/halo/starburst is my concern -- i have that now _without_ lasik, so it would probably get worse.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhurley
Member
49 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: El Dorado Hills, CA
     
Sep 15, 2008 14:36 as a reply to  @ scokar's post |  #10

I had lasik done about 8 years ago and it's one of the best things I've ever done. I was practically blind without my contacts. Regarding the halos, I've never experienced anything more than I had with contact, so I don't consider this a problem. I'm to to point where I need reading glasses (happens to everyone, no matter what), but still have no problems with the controls on my camera.

Good Luck if you do it.:D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CH3NO2
Senior Member
Avatar
267 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Sep 15, 2008 14:58 |  #11

I had Lasik done 1 1/2 years ago. I can see better now then when I had my glasses on before. Night driving was my enemy and now no problems at all. With what I had done I can honestly say it is like watching HD TV, everything is so crisp.

Post op for the first week was a PITA as I had to put in drops every 30 minutes (while awake) for the first 2 days and then every hour for the next few days. When I woke up in the morning for the first few weeks my eyes were very dry and scratchy. Eye drops become your best friend. It was worth every penny.


Canon 40D, G11
Tokina 28-80 f/2.8
Canon 100-400 L IS
Sigma 10-20
Metz 58AF-1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HotShots
Member
Avatar
158 posts
Joined Apr 2007
     
Sep 15, 2008 15:21 as a reply to  @ CH3NO2's post |  #12

I had mine done about 6 months ago. Like many other, I was nearly blind without glasses/contacts. I have not had any problems with halos or anything else like that. I think the technology has improved so far that much of the problems with that have been minimized.

I shot a track meet 2 days after having the procedure done. Now, keep in mind, I only shot my daughter and didn't do any real "event" shooting for about 2 weeks.

I have only had two "complaints" --

1) I'm an idiot for waiting. I should have had it done years ago!!!!
2) I couldn't sleep for a while. Before the surgery I had a definite pattern - take my contacts out, lay down in bed, take my glasses off and put them in the exact same spot (so I could find them in the morning). After the surgery, I couldn't go to sleep. I finally realized I was missing many of the steps I normally took at night. I quickly developed new habits and the problem was solved.

I would say having the surgery is one of the best decisions I have EVER made.

Good Luck!
TDF




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moeronn
Goldmember
2,516 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Sep 15, 2008 15:40 |  #13

Like most, my biggest regret about the surgery was waiting so long. I had it done nearly 5 years ago and have been very happy with it. I do have dry eyes, but most of that is from sitting in front of a computer most of the day and forgetting to blink.

The issues with halos isn't as common these days, as the coverage of the laser has gotten better - before it wouldn't cover the entire pupil when dilated.

My wife had hers done nearly 9 years ago, and is going in for a touch up on one eye because of halos. We're going back to the same Dr that did both of our surgeries.

As for costs - it isn't difficult to find a very reputable surgeon to do both eyes for under $2000 (US) - including correcting astigmatism.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Sep 16, 2008 05:28 |  #14

I often listen to a consumer-related talk radio show host Clark Howard. He talks about lasik all the time. He needs it but says he will not get it - at least not now. His reasoning is that currently the success rate is about 98% Yes, that's great odds - unless you unluckily fall into that 2%. His thoughts are that he will not get it until that success rate improves. I was born with 20/10 vision and had it most of my life - until computer work trashed it. Yet, I will not get lasik until my odds improve. Read this press clipping (external link) reprint and then ask yourself if you want to take chances with what may be your one most-important sense - your vision.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,096 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Laser Vision Correction and the Photographer
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1571 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.