GKPE 6 - 3 years on

weka2000 wrote in post #7369974
On photography related matters

Camera gear back home along with me

That's good to hear

Just spent nearly an hour shovelling snow... Saves fitness centre memberships.

A photo:

Jesus, how old's that!? Chris has got hair and everything!

It was taken about 12 months before this one:

Ha!

So other people did actually take photos on that trip then!??

I miss my 50 F1.2L

manipula wrote in post #7372910
Ha!

So other people did actually take photos on that trip then!??

Apprently, although I only got 3 worth showing.

This group of Pommy tourists looking very English on the beach:

tag141 wrote in post #7365674
I thought P2P and torrents were hard to police as the 'parts' come from loads of different computers all over the planet with no particular IP.

As I understand it, that's what makes it so easy to police. Movie studios are paying companies (like Bay TSP, Entertainment Software Association) to host 'honeypots' which serve the same files, so your torrent can pick up parts from there, and be tracked.

These offshore companies then send your ISP a notice with an IP address, time, and filename. This has been going on for a long time, but because these are unsubstatiated alegations (ie there's no hard evidence that would hold up in court) most ISPs have been simply ignoring these notices. The notable exception is xnet (world exchange) who have been somewhat ruthless in disconnecting people with little/no warning.

Section 92a of the copyright act is the new ammendment which was passed and is about to become law. It essentially states that ISPs must act on these allegations by disconnecting your internet, so no more ignoring them. You have no recourse or way of arguing against these allegations, and are guilty by accusation.

A select comittee investigated the proposed ammendment and recommended to the govt that it be thrown out as rubbish. The govt completely ignored their recommendations and passed it anyway.

ummm

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

(hobbit foot).

(very tall, hobbit foot).

roflmao
seriously!!

lance v wrote in post #7376103
ummm

and again!!!


stop it, you guys are killing me

Moppie wrote in post #7376117
(hobbit foot).

(very tall, hobbit foot).

lance v wrote in post #7376103
ummm

Ha, how did you even spot that?

lance v wrote in post #7376103
ummm

I can't stop laughing...
Or should I be concerned.