From the Colorado Railroad Museum at Golden:
40D + 17-40mm f/4L .. 1/125 @ f/4 ISO 100 B&W Conversion in LR2 C&C Welcome
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Sep 18, 2008 21:18 | #1 From the Colorado Railroad Museum at Golden:
Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Sep 19, 2008 07:43 | #2 I like it. FYI, Pbase took a long time to load it. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 19, 2008 09:10 | #3 Very nice. I love watching a Shay run by. All that motion and noise and plenty of time to enjoy it as it creeps by. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 20, 2008 17:53 | #4 No detail in the blacks. Usually means underexposure. A silver reflector held under the camera lens and angled up will bounce some light back into those darks shadows and brighten them up.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Sep 20, 2008 21:07 | #5 No detail in the blacks. Usually means underexposure. True. But it could also mean that he didn't want detail in those blacks? Looks OK in color managed Firefox3. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 20, 2008 21:59 | #6 I like the way the shadow background makes the cylinders, rods, and cranks stand out more. There's nothing much back there anyway other than the frame girder and some brake piping. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woolburr Rest in peace old friend. 66,487 posts Gallery: 115 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 143 Joined Sep 2005 Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC! More info | Sep 21, 2008 06:43 | #7 Benji wrote in post #6347880 No detail in the blacks. Usually means underexposure. A silver reflector held under the camera lens and angled up will bounce some light back into those darks shadows and brighten them up. Benji I'm looking at it on a calibrated monitor, using a color managed browser....and I am not seeing any signs of underexposure. In fact, it seems quite well exposed. I would say it is a pretty good shot just as it is. People that know me call me Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2680 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||