Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 19 Sep 2008 (Friday) 20:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

mooooooooooooooo.....

 
carseasoncity
Senior Member
602 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Missouri
     
Sep 19, 2008 20:11 |  #1

I've been facing the dreaded business card making drama...my head hurts! So I've decided to print some mini cards through Moo.com. I need some input on the font and the card overall. Like it, hate it? My name, phone and email will be on the back. And for those of you who don't know, Moo cards are half the size of a regular business cards. Thanks for any input.
B


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


I hate cameras. They are so much more sure than I am about everything. ~ John Steinbeck

My Ramblings: www.priesterphotograph​y.blogspot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Sep 19, 2008 20:45 |  #2

First one is good, but the pictures of pregnancy are highly overrated.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mizaki
Senior Member
308 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Sep 20, 2008 06:11 |  #3

I like them very much, especially the first shot.


Canon EOS 40D and 50D, some lenses with curious red stripes and other gadgets. Previously a very satisfied owner of 20D.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Sep 20, 2008 09:56 |  #4

chauncey wrote in post #6343666 (external link)
First one is good, but the pictures of pregnancy are highly overrated.

But, they are a fact of life and women would grab that card before they would one of a macro spider:p

I love the first one.


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cdeming
"īt" didn't fall off
Avatar
1,968 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Chicago-ish
     
Sep 20, 2008 09:56 |  #5

My vote is for the first one!


;) Chrissy
Gear - 5D, Canon 85mm 1.2L, 50mm 1.2L, 24mm 1.2L, Speedlite 580EXII Website (external link) l Blog  (external link)l Facebook (external link) (friend me) l Fanpage (external link) (like me :))
Currently Reading (again): Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
potn_momma2
Senior Member
350 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Sep 20, 2008 13:05 |  #6

My vote is definitely for the second, love that idea!


https://photography-on-the.net …?p=5960761&post​count=1286

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navy.wife_2004
Member
Avatar
58 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Hampton Roads area, Virginia
     
Sep 20, 2008 13:12 |  #7

i think the first one. as the preggo pics might be somethign a woman would grab, i think the man holding the baby is so precious, women love that too!


www.myspace.com/kristy​s_photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carseasoncity
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
602 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Missouri
     
Sep 20, 2008 15:05 |  #8

I think I may have been a bit confusing, but I wasn't deciding on which one to use. I'm creating maybe 25 different cards and needed help deciding on a font and layout. Here are two more shots to show you what I mean. They will have my info on the back.
Thanks!
B


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


I hate cameras. They are so much more sure than I am about everything. ~ John Steinbeck

My Ramblings: www.priesterphotograph​y.blogspot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Sep 20, 2008 15:18 as a reply to  @ carseasoncity's post |  #9

I guess it's because I'm slower than the average bear.
Are you asking if your work is up to snuff (I like it), or what?


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carseasoncity
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
602 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Missouri
     
Sep 20, 2008 15:31 |  #10

chauncey wrote in post #6347329 (external link)
I guess it's because I'm slower than the average bear.
Are you asking if your work is up to snuff (I like it), or what?

I guess I'm just wondering what everyone thinks about the idea of the pictures with the font and the layout. Is the font okay? I'm trying out some other fonts...I'm just not sold on this one. And do the pictures work...meaning will they look okay printed on a business card that's half the size of a regular card (MOO.COM)? I want to print several different biz cards instead of 250 cards with the same image on them, so I'm choosing about 25 different images to print. Does that make sense? I'm sorry...I think staring at these cards for the last two evenings is making me incoherent.
B


I hate cameras. They are so much more sure than I am about everything. ~ John Steinbeck

My Ramblings: www.priesterphotograph​y.blogspot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidPhoto
Senior Member
777 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: MA, USA
     
Sep 20, 2008 15:36 |  #11

they look good as is and since the photos draw your attention the font is less important. Are the cards really long and short like that????




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shannyD
"...in too much trouble"
Avatar
5,219 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit.
     
Sep 20, 2008 15:41 |  #12

i really like both of them a lot.. well all 4 actually... maybe get a mix of them printed?

then again im not into business for myself.. so im not the freatest when it comes to that.


but i think they are all fabulous.

shannon




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slivr
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Reno / Lake Tahoe - Nevada, USA
     
Sep 20, 2008 15:52 |  #13

Just a personal opinion for what it's worth:
a.) I think the layout's great
b.) The font weight, point size and tracking is fine, but is a bit odd for the eye to register with it's mis-shaped "i" and "s" ... but that same trait forces the viewer's eye to focus on it which may have been your intent.
c.) The pregnancy sonogram (sp?) image will be almost indiscernable when printed. I did something similar with the same size card but small objects had little detail to them and zero "impact" for the viewer at that size. At roughly 1/4" for the fetus image in your layout it'll be tough to discern it, but I like the concept.


- Jason S.
More gear and money than talent ... but workin' at it!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carseasoncity
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
602 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Missouri
     
Sep 20, 2008 16:16 |  #14

DavidPhoto wrote in post #6347403 (external link)
they look good as is and since the photos draw your attention the font is less important. Are the cards really long and short like that????

Yep. They're MOO cards. They're half the size of a regular business cards.

shannyD wrote in post #6347422 (external link)
i really like both of them a lot.. well all 4 actually... maybe get a mix of them printed?

then again im not into business for myself.. so im not the freatest when it comes to that.

but i think they are all fabulous.

shannon

I was planning on printing about 15-25 different images. I wanted some input first thoug, so thanks!

slivr wrote in post #6347481 (external link)
Just a personal opinion for what it's worth:
a.) I think the layout's great
b.) The font weight, point size and tracking is fine, but is a bit odd for the eye to register with it's mis-shaped "i" and "s" ... but that same trait forces the viewer's eye to focus on it which may have been your intent.
c.) The pregnancy sonogram (sp?) image will be almost indiscernable when printed. I did something similar with the same size card but small objects had little detail to them and zero "impact" for the viewer at that size. At roughly 1/4" for the fetus image in your layout it'll be tough to discern it, but I like the concept.

This is the kind of input I was talking about. Thanks! I've found a few other fonts I think will look better. I'll post some in a minute. I didn't think about the sonogram shot not showing up. Good point. I have some other maternity shots that will work better. Thanks again for the constructive critique.
B


I hate cameras. They are so much more sure than I am about everything. ~ John Steinbeck

My Ramblings: www.priesterphotograph​y.blogspot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kab8715
Senior Member
Avatar
321 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Sep 20, 2008 22:02 |  #15

I think they are all great. I think the font is great also. Nice to see that you are keeping it simple on the front and not "flooding" it with too much text or worried about filling every possible space. I do however like the ones with the black backgrounds better than the grey.... not sure why... they just seem to jump out to me more. :)


Kim ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,403 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
mooooooooooooooo.....
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2719 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.