The gallery is up: http://www.dpreview.com …y/canoneos5dmkii_preview/
ISO 6400 looks pretty good in the Olympus cameras shots.
David S Senior Member ![]() 559 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 Location: La Jolla, CA More info | Sep 20, 2008 05:54 | #1 The gallery is up: http://www.dpreview.com …y/canoneos5dmkii_preview/ Leica M | Sony a7R | Fujfilm X-Pro 1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sadatk Goldmember ![]() 1,392 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Atlanta More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:06 | #2 Looks great to me. Sad that they're still camera jpegs, but I can't blame the dpreview for that since there's no raw converter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LuisE Senior Member ![]() 500 posts Joined Sep 2005 Location: South Florida, US More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:13 | #3 Thanks for the link. Canon 40D,Canon 50D,Canon EFs 10-22 f/3.5-4.5,Canon 70-200 2.8L IS, Canon 24-70 2.8L ,Canon EF 50mm 1.4 USM, , 2 Speedlites 580EX and 420EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sfordphoto Goldmember 2,564 posts Joined Feb 2008 More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:15 | #4 at least he's using some stopped down primes for some of the shots
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The_Camera_Poser Goldmember 3,012 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:15 | #5 ![]() I guess Canon's advanced in their high ISO image quality!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The_Camera_Poser Goldmember 3,012 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:20 | #6 ![]() Doesn't get noisy to the point that it'd bother me until 6400. Gee willikers!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
myjunk Senior Member 269 posts Joined Jun 2008 More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:30 | #7 photo #39 at ISO12800 does look decent as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sfordphoto Goldmember 2,564 posts Joined Feb 2008 More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:32 | #8 |
myjunk Senior Member 269 posts Joined Jun 2008 More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:34 | #9 you know what.. I plan to take these pics out to the phhoto lab and print some 8x10 to take a look. that's the BEST judge of how tolerable the noise is correct?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop ![]() 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:37 | #10 ISO 12800 is pretty impressive. Overall, I like what I'm seeing so far. Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Croasdail making stuff up ![]() More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:40 | #11 Last 5 images are the telling ones.... hot dang. Looks pretty dang good. ISO 3200 looks really nice. This opens up so many opportunities.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sfordphoto Goldmember 2,564 posts Joined Feb 2008 More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:44 | #12 |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | Sep 20, 2008 06:49 | #13 Wow, 6400 looks great! 12800 looks useable... 25600 is fun to talk about. connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" ![]() More info | Sep 20, 2008 07:01 | #14 I'd call it about 1 stop better than the 5D, 2 stops better than the 40D. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cadenza Senior Member 440 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: SF Bay More info | Sep 20, 2008 07:25 | #15 Very impressive! Sorry 5DMK1 owners, it looks like your expensive toy will soon be joining the reap of underused/obsolete electronics in the garage. Now, if I get this thing, would the modestly priced but respected Tamron 28-75 f2.8 provide enough resolving power for that new sensor?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Blagotebi 923 guests, 321 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |