Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 21 Sep 2008 (Sunday) 10:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

blown out sleeves

 
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 23, 2008 02:45 |  #16

Under these circumstances, I wouldn't even worry about it. No one's really going to be concentrating on his sleeves. At least not if the photo captures a great moment.

You do what you can within the limitations of digital and don't sweat the small stuff.


From a technical perspective, turning down the contrast in-camera can help if you don't want to shoot RAW.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walczak ­ Photo
Goldmember
1,034 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 24, 2008 12:32 |  #17

black_z wrote in post #6355037 (external link)
It's funny how some people say to underexpose and others say to overexpose!


Just my opinion here, but I think this is one of those "film to digital" things. I'm not sure of the exact terminology here so if I'm saying this wrong, please forgive me but in the days of film, people were told to "expose for the shadows" because if you lost shadow detail with film, basically it was just gone. Film had/has a much higher latitude(?) to highlights than it does for shadows. Digital on the other hand is just the opposite. Because of the way that a digital sensor works, there is an absolute limit to how bright highlights can be before they "blow out" and as with shadows in film, once the detail is lost, it's just lost...in otherwords, with digital you should expose for the highlights.

Personally because of what I shoot (mainly critters and such) and the way I shoot (often "on the fly") I don't really have time or desire to be thinking too much about exposure per say. If I'm standing there trying to take a picture of a fox for example and I'm trying to calculate the "optimum exposure"...chances are I've already missed my shot. Because of this with highlights and digital, as I said before, I usually have my Exposure Comp bumped down just a bit to under expose the image just a little and thus, in most cases, preserve the highlight detail. It's just easier with digital to brighten up a dark image a little as apposed to trying to recover highlight detail that's no longer there. There certainly are extremes in both cases, be it film or digital, where you can go too much, but my main goal is simply to get the shot "in the ball park" and fix anything else later in pp.

Peace,
Jim


"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
Walczak Photography - www.walczakphoto.izfre​e.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,913 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
blown out sleeves
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2750 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.