Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 09 Feb 2005 (Wednesday) 17:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

are multi-coated filters worth double the price of non MC filters?

 
johnathanesper
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Feb 09, 2005 17:50 |  #1

are the double prices for Hoya's HMC (multi-coated) filters worth the extra money?
Thanks!
Johnathan Esper
www.wildernessphotogra​phs.com (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,743 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Feb 09, 2005 18:10 |  #2

Yes. Here's a post I made in a previous thread. I purposely set up an extreme situation to show the effects of a cheap filter on flare.

Tom W wrote:
The context of this thread, and another thread on another web site (I'm cheating on y'all) provoked me to take this series of images. All were shot with a very bright flashlight shining into the camera lens, just off to the left. Granted, its a worst-case situation, but I think it demonstrates the effects of filters on flare.

first, the lens without filter:
QUOTED IMAGE



Now, the inexpensive Canon UV/Haze filter (note the drastic increase in flare):
QUOTED IMAGE



And finally, with a Hoya Super HMC multicoated UV filter (note that it is very close to the unfiltered image):
QUOTED IMAGE


Tom
5D III, 70D, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnathanesper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Feb 2005
     
Feb 09, 2005 18:12 |  #3

thanks! that was very helpful!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,920 posts
Likes: 333
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 09, 2005 18:17 |  #4

From that, if you bother to get a filter, get a good one. I recently took the expensive hoya filter off my Tamron, I figured it wasn't doing any good, but I might put it back on now... or at least do a few tests myself.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huckaback ­ Photo
Senior Member
Avatar
683 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: South Wales. u.k.
     
Feb 09, 2005 18:18 |  #5

Yes is the correct answer. best Hoya HMC or B & W quallity filters are great.


Old photographers never die. They just go out of focus

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pcasciola
POTN SHOPKEEPER
Avatar
3,130 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Millstone Township, NJ
     
Feb 09, 2005 18:24 |  #6

I recently bought a Hoya Super Multicoated UV filter from Adorama for my 85mm, like the one Tom W showed above. The salesman called me and said he could sell me a Tiffen 3 filter kit for $10 more than just the UV I had just ordered. When I said I'd rather have one good filter than three cheap-o ones, he said, "Ok, that's your business. I was just trying to be helpful".


Philip Casciola
Pro Camera Gear (external link) - POTN Shop (external link)
Canon 7D, EF 50/1.8, EF 85/1.8, EF 300/4L IS, EF-S 18-55, Tamron 28-75/2.8, EF 70-200/2.8L IS
Sigma 1.4x & 2x, Tamron 1.4x, Gitzo 2220 Explorer, 322RC2 grip

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ijohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,646 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Whiteriver, AZ
     
Feb 09, 2005 18:39 |  #7

I have never paid to much attention to the difference. I always buy the most expensive one because I can't bring myself to put $30 glass in front of my $1000 lens. It just doesn't make sense. I don't like using them at all but I do because I couldn't bear to see the Canon glass scratched.


www.trickoflight.net (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/i​tj12345 (external link)
Original 5D still ROCKS!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
12345Michael54321
Senior Member
559 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Baltimore County, Maryland, USA
     
Feb 09, 2005 19:33 as a reply to  @ ijohnson's post |  #8

Multi-coating is better in a fair percentage of situations. It's very rarely worse.

If you're willing to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars for your camera, and hundreds or thousands of dollars more for your lenses, does it really make sense to run a non-trivial risk of compromising image quality in order to save $20-60 (that being the typical price difference between multi-coated and non-multi-coated filters)?

I mean, final image quality is the result of a "chain" of factors (proper focus, proper exposure, steadiness of camera support, lens quality, etc.), where a single weak "link" can significantly impair the ultimate outcome. Spending a few extra bucks on a top qualilty filter can turn a potentially weak link into a strong one. Seems like a no brainer kind of decision to me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

15,576 views & 0 likes for this thread
are multi-coated filters worth double the price of non MC filters?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is elizaseren
771 guests, 292 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.