First time with the NEW lens...Critique Please???
Matt30D Senior Member 738 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Sep 25, 2008 10:15 | #1 First time with the NEW lens...Critique Please??? www.schuldtimagery.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ElDuderino Goldmember 1,921 posts Likes: 8 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Denver, CO More info | Sep 25, 2008 10:17 | #2 |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Sep 25, 2008 10:20 | #3 El Duderino wrote in post #6378494 Too small. a hummer stretch is too small http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 25, 2008 10:21 | #4 How do you make it larger to view? www.schuldtimagery.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yuriyo923 Goldmember 2,284 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2007 Location: US More info | Sep 25, 2008 10:21 | #5 Nice image.. I'd like to see more of the front of the H2! Canon 5D2 ~ 40D + 17-50mm in da booth!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SMP_Homer Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 25, 2008 10:21 | #6 El Duderino wrote in post #6378494 Too small. Barely bigger than a FF sensor!!! EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 25, 2008 11:13 | #7 The lens was strapped to my 30D www.schuldtimagery.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | OK for testing out the wideness of your new lens, but (from what I can tell at such a small size) the back of the hummer is quite blown out. I'm not really seeing much except "wow, 10mm is wide"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The 70-200 2.8 IS was 1400.00!!!! www.schuldtimagery.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | Sep 25, 2008 12:23 | #10 What does that have to do with anything? Matt30D wrote in post #6379193 The 70-200 2.8 IS was 1400.00!!!! My Toyota Highlander cost $26000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MattMoore Goldmember 1,839 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2007 Location: San Antonio, TX - USA More info | Sep 25, 2008 15:22 | #11 What he was saying was the pic you posted was too small in size top really offer any CC.
b.) increase the size, but reduce the quality to be able to meet the forums filesize limit for attached images). And the 70-200L f/2.8 IS is worth it (I too am at a loss as to what this has to do with this thread).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rodinal Goldmember 1,127 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Sep 25, 2008 15:26 | #12 Permanent banimho, Canon equipment is too sweet to use it on monstrously ugly subjects 1D Mark II • 16-35/2.8L mk I • 24-70L • 70-200/2.8L IS • 50/1.8 • 24-85 • 400/5.6L • 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyWebber Goldmember 3,187 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2006 Location: Corralejo, Fuerteventura....Canary Islands Spain More info | Sep 26, 2008 00:06 | #13 SMP_Homer wrote in post #6378522 Barely bigger than a FF sensor!!!
Canon 7D, 40D,100-400 IS L, EFS 15-85 IS, EFS 10-22-With Faulty USM, 055XPROB+488RC2, 430 & 580 II Flash, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mizaki Senior Member 308 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | Sep 26, 2008 10:38 | #14 I was just wondering if you could just consider the following: Canon EOS 40D and 50D, some lenses with curious red stripes and other gadgets. Previously a very satisfied owner of 20D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyWebber Goldmember 3,187 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2006 Location: Corralejo, Fuerteventura....Canary Islands Spain More info | Sep 26, 2008 23:10 | #15 Mizaki wrote in post #6385004 I was just wondering if you could just consider the following: - Take the image, open Photoshop or some comparable image editing program. - Resize the image to 1024 limit of the forum (I am affraid that on my 2560 × 1600 30" monitor and even on my 1920 × 1200 24" secondary monitor, this image appears extremely tiny - about the size of stamp or even less). - Use the "save for the web"-function (or comparable) to compress the image to meet the data size limits imposed by the forum. - Repost the whole thing for some constructive criticism - unfortunately the image you posted is far too small for the purposes of any meaningful critique. - Start a new thread when you have done the above. I truly hope that this helps. After all, even though the image you posted appears tiny, it certainly deserves comments. he he Canon 7D, 40D,100-400 IS L, EFS 15-85 IS, EFS 10-22-With Faulty USM, 055XPROB+488RC2, 430 & 580 II Flash, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2749 guests, 148 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||