Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 25 Sep 2008 (Thursday) 15:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My baby shots are coming out horrible

 
kekoa
Senior Member
650 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: HB- California
     
Sep 25, 2008 15:08 |  #1

Hi all, our baby is about 2 months old and most of my shots are taken indoors with crappy lighting using my 40D and 17-55. As you know, its impossible to keep a baby still so i try to stop the lens down, but its still not fast enough to mitigate blur. Can anyone help me? Do i need to get a good flash or just start taking pics with my 50MM1.4 in bad light?

thanks all.

IMAGE: http://images3.pnimedia.com/GetImage.aspx/1O57yfU5gDO046NP9pyw4JBtG3UE8lOr1g9eFuBx9SGKoGo0baEEIIOogGUJvy69BnvqeGbb7CGQ-/image.jpg

IMAGE: http://images3.pnimedia.com/GetImage.aspx/1r0KlsSgKLUjxPBRRJnATX4qR,KB0meKlzVvcXi06Qe4ZTpIWJamLwa8O2RWyuQdEV,IjOGbaMzo-/image.jpg

IMAGE: http://images3.pnimedia.com/GetImage.aspx/15TdV,bJjW4AH,4,45,40OOyRyR0MUhn8CdMjGuKR0JL9LJ4s6Bygx2bGGaJwGarPccjjyw4EOkI-/image.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,518 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Langtoft. England.
     
Sep 25, 2008 15:14 |  #2

The shots look fine for a on camera flash? (I asume as you said Get a good flash), and I find Bal/fill flash is better from a flashgun. Number two needs croping a bit tighter, the remote is distracting..


Terry.:cool:
http://www.terrykirton.co/ (external link)
http://www.ttkphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
http://www.langtoftpho​tography.com/ (external link)

 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kekoa
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
650 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: HB- California
     
Sep 25, 2008 15:29 |  #3

TTk wrote in post #6380106 (external link)
The shots look fine for a on camera flash? (I asume as you said Get a good flash), and I find Bal/fill flash is better from a flashgun. Number two needs croping a bit tighter, the remote is distracting..

actually those are all just natural or available light. no flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,050 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2007
Location: california
     
Sep 25, 2008 16:41 |  #4

at this age they shoot not be moving that much, esp in the one she is asleep. those images look fine. a flash and a faster lens are both options. I would look into sigma 30 1.4, or sigma 50 1.4. also it looks like there is good ambient light. consider shooting at iso 800 or 1600.


My Flickr (external link)
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205576

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Sep 25, 2008 16:47 |  #5

Use the window light; don't just accept the baby where it is... move it over to the window. Think about your background - that is the main thing that is distracting in these shots. Try a white blanket or a black dress or whatever you have that will make for a simpler background (rather than the out of focus TV, couch, etc).


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Sep 25, 2008 18:33 as a reply to  @ TheHoff's post |  #6

Well if the shutter speed is too slow and you're all the way at f/2.8, you can either raise the ISO, or use your 50mm f/1.4.

I have a five month old son, and for the first week, it was all natural light with my 30mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.8. Then I started using flash and the pictures got much better. Definetly think about getting an external flash.

For now, you can experiment with your prime lens and/or using natural light from the window.

I think those pictures look pretty good as is though.

Good luck!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
azpix
Goldmember
Avatar
3,335 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Chandler, Arizona USA
     
Sep 25, 2008 19:34 |  #7

get in tighter. otherwise, i think they look fine


Gear- 7d, 24-70L, sigma 70-200, Sigma 120-400, canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.0,sigma 10-20 and a DJI Mavic Pro Drone

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maureen ­ Souza
Ms. MODERATOR     Something Spectacular!
Avatar
34,157 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9276
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Central California
     
Sep 25, 2008 19:40 |  #8

Put your baby in front of a big window or sliding glass door and zoom in for a tighter crop. Set you shutter speed for about 80 and ISO at 400. Let the camera choose your aperture. Tweak the settings if they are too light or dark. Keep practicing and I know you'll get it. That lens always performs well for me.


Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.

5DMK4
7DMK2
Canon Lenses: 50/1.4, 135/2.0, 100-400mm II, 24-70/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NSG40D
Member
195 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: USA
     
Sep 25, 2008 21:43 |  #9

I would work out the equivalents of F2 and no more than ISO400. You should be ok indoors with that - or move near a window to get the indirect light falling on the eyes. I do this all the time with a 50 1.4 w/o issue. And definately - compose in your mind and see the stuff in the bk - the remotes and such.


EOS 7D, 40D plus primes.....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,135 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
My baby shots are coming out horrible
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2682 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.