These are not mine, found on flickr: follow this link
and there are full sized originals if you click the All Sizes tab.
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT  10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Sep 25, 2008 22:05 | #1 These are not mine, found on flickr: follow this link
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kippei Member 61 posts Joined May 2008 More info | Sep 25, 2008 22:14 | #2 I copy down one of the iso 6400 pic and do a NR and a crop and sharpen... It looks good..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheShotLessTaken Member  91 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: California More info | Sep 25, 2008 22:19 | #3 Why do they all say taken on January 1 2000? In the details on the right. himynameisfrank
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011  More info | Sep 25, 2008 22:21 | #4 TheShotLessTaken wrote in post #6382491 Why do they all say taken on January 1 2000? In the details on the right. Probably never reset the date/time on the camera? Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith THREAD STARTER Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Sep 25, 2008 22:21 | #5 TheShotLessTaken wrote in post #6382491 Why do they all say taken on January 1 2000? In the details on the right. Most likely is a loner and the time and date haven't been set.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith THREAD STARTER Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | These images run thru CS3 with a little bit of Noiseware applied turn out really well. Reduced in size for the web they sharpen up very nicely. One thing that I've noticed with the 50D images I'm finding is that they seem to sharpen up better than with my 40D ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamLewis Goldmember  4,122 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Sep 25, 2008 22:44 | #7 Well I looked at two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamLewis Goldmember 4,122 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Sep 25, 2008 22:48 | #8 And I want to know why, even at 1600 ISO, the grass never looks sharp/detailed...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith THREAD STARTER Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Sep 25, 2008 22:53 | #9 AdamLewis wrote in post #6382649 Well I looked at two. One is a 6400 shot with missed focus (not a good indicator...) and one is a 3200 shot with NO detail at 100% (not a good indicator...) After that, I just stopped looking Adam he posted a thread over at: dpreview
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AdamLewis Goldmember 4,122 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Sep 25, 2008 22:58 | #10 Tsmith wrote in post #6382706 Adam he posted a thread over at: dpreview and explains the camera is a store sample and in some shots used the cameras 9 point AF selection. He got good results when he selected the AF Point.Im not talking about the first ones...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith THREAD STARTER Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Sep 25, 2008 23:02 | #11 AdamLewis wrote in post #6382738 Im not talking about the first ones... Curious as to which two that turn you off so quickly. Admittedly I opened some in ZoomBrowser to check the AF selection and it was off from the subject as intended.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oneslowz28 Senior Member  621 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Aiken, SC More info | Sep 25, 2008 23:37 | #12 Tsmith wrote in post #6382532 These images run thru CS3 with a little bit of Noiseware applied turn out really well. Reduced in size for the web they sharpen up very nicely. One thing that I've noticed with the 50D images I'm finding is that they seem to sharpen up better than with my 40D ...  Well of course the 50D has many more pixels to "fine tune" than what your 40D outputs. 60D, 50 f/1.8 Metal Mount, 28-135 IS. Lost a 1D Mk III, and several L's in a home fire last summer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 863 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
