only had my DLSR (canon eos 450d love it 1st time user) for a few month this is the 1st time changing from colour to B&W
all comments welcome as it will help me to improve
billkouk Member 42 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: uk (sunderland city) More info | Sep 27, 2008 08:32 | #1 only had my DLSR (canon eos 450d love it 1st time user) for a few month this is the 1st time changing from colour to B&W
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fr0natz Member 216 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: Oklahoma the 918 More info | Sep 27, 2008 21:04 | #2 Flash kinda kills the skin tones to me. 40D, XT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop 7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Sep 27, 2008 22:37 | #3 The color version looks more "alive", but the B & W conversion holds your interest longer. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
griptape Goldmember 2,037 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Home More info | Sep 29, 2008 01:04 | #4 I like the color version best, but both are rather bland to my eyes. How did you do the B&W conversion? I disagree with bob that it holds my interest longer. It just looks like a lump of mid tones to me. Here's a conversion that appeals to my eyes:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks for the comments all
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Something happened to one eye in grips.edit?
you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks flo your right i never noticed the eye looks a little cloudy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PETERSYMES Goldmember 1,502 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Kent,England More info | I like the original colour shot best and what i like best about the shot is the very natural expression you have captured.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 29, 2008 16:47 | #9 PETERSYMES wrote in post #6404378 I like the original colour shot best and what i like best about the shot is the very natural expression you have captured. I see you shot it at a 60th of a second at f4.0. Rather slow for hand held assuming it was not on a tripod but the focus is off seems to be on the top of her forehead rather than the all important eyes which should be pin sharp. Maybe a bit of camera shake at 1/60th or just missed the focal point. ![]() thank you
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 08, 2008 09:09 | #10 [QUOTE=griptape;6400597]I like the color version best, but both are rather bland to my eyes. How did you do the B&W conversion? I disagree with bob that it holds my interest longer. It just looks like a lump of mid tones to me. Here's a conversion that appeals to my eyes:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
acchildress Senior Member 986 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | Oct 08, 2008 11:52 | #11 Did you pull the color version off? I only see the b/w in someone else's quote.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lonelyjew Goldmember 1,411 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2008 More info | Oct 08, 2008 11:57 | #12 I don't see the color version but I think the noise doesn't have a good effect on the skin in the B/W version. It makes her skin look very rough and unflattering. Canon 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yes i took off the colour and b&w
LOG IN TO REPLY |
clickcanon40 Senior Member 605 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Texas More info | Oct 08, 2008 17:52 | #14 |
lonelyjew Goldmember 1,411 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2008 More info | Oct 08, 2008 17:59 | #15 Billkouk if you don't have an image up for critiquing you should ask for the thread to be locked. Canon 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2684 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||