Usually 6 months behind? Not at all, it's a cyclical thing. ATI and nVidia have leapfrogged each other from time to time. Even AMD and Intel processors have.
Sep 30, 2008 08:06 | #16 Usually 6 months behind? Not at all, it's a cyclical thing. ATI and nVidia have leapfrogged each other from time to time. Even AMD and Intel processors have. http://www.colorblindedphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BottomBracket THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,398 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2004 Location: NYC More info | Oct 01, 2008 18:15 | #17 Thanks for sharing your builds! I am sure there are more out there. Pio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 02, 2008 22:59 | #18 System Name: Workstation 1 Some call me the Heilan' Laddie, but others call me Rob.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 02, 2008 23:17 | #19 Q9650 C2Q Custom Build - Mainly due to work requirements+Games
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nightcrawler Senior Member ![]() 685 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Omaha, NE More info | Oct 03, 2008 14:46 | #20 I built both my desktop and server. The desktop is a little dated and could use an update, but I would rather wait until I need it so that I can spend my money on glass.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yohan Pamudji Goldmember ![]() 2,994 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Mississippi More info | Oct 03, 2008 15:40 | #21 Recently upgraded some of the main bits in mine--CPU, motherboard, RAM--to bring the system up to speed. All the rest are holdovers from the previous frankenstein build (bits and pieces acquired over a 2-year span or so).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer ![]() 51,009 posts Likes: 369 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Oct 03, 2008 15:44 | #22 Yohan Pamudji wrote in post #6432044 ![]() Before this I was on an AMD Athlon64 X2 4600+ dual core, and the Q6600 smokes it in Lightroom. With the same catalog and hard drive it was taking 7-8 seconds to generate 1:1 previews when zooming in, and now it only takes about 2 seconds. Importing and exporting are lightning fast as well. For my use, 4 slower cores was the right choice over 2 faster cores of the E8400 at the same-ish price. Good to know, thanks. I have the X2 4800+ and I was wondering if the quad cores would be much faster. I'll get the quad 9xxx some time, or an 8 core if they come out any time soon, which should absolutely smoke my current system. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jjaenagle Goldmember 1,506 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: richmond, va More info | ![]() This is fun!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yohan Pamudji Goldmember ![]() 2,994 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Mississippi More info | Oct 03, 2008 15:59 | #24 tim wrote in post #6432080 ![]() Good to know, thanks. I have the X2 4800+ and I was wondering if the quad cores would be much faster. I'll get the quad 9xxx some time, or an 8 core if they come out any time soon, which should absolutely smoke my current system. I have to process 25,000 photos this summer. Do you use Lightroom? I didn't use Lightroom v1 with this quad so can't comment on v1, but v2 at least makes good use of all 4 cores. So if you use Lightroom 2 I'm confident quad will be better than dual at any pricepoint. I went with the Q6600 over one of the newer Q9xxx models mainly because of BIOS compatibility concerns, i.e., I wasn't sure if the motherboard would ship with a BIOS that would be able to boot with one of the newer quads, and don't have a cheap Socket 775 CPU lying around to upgrade BIOS with if not. Plus I figured I'd try the Q6600 and if it wasn't fast enough I'd just sell it after using it to upgrade the BIOS and get a Q9550, but I'm satisfied with the Q6600 so I saved a few bucks. My thinking is that with Nehalem so close it's not really worth it to sink too much money into an LG 775 system that won't be upgradeable. Might as well get the best bang for the buck quad I could, and save some money for the inevitable Nehalem upgrade.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer ![]() 51,009 posts Likes: 369 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Oct 03, 2008 16:17 | #25 I use Bridge, and yeah i'm waiting for Nehalem, but I don't think 8 core will be out in time for me. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pekka El General Moderator ![]() More info | Oct 03, 2008 17:51 | #26 I have two desktop PC's, one is for Photoshop and games, other is a low power silent PC for browsing and keeping POTN status visible, that is also the PC which I take with me on the road if needed. The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zepher Goldmember ![]() 1,626 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Norfolk,VA More info | Oct 04, 2008 07:15 | #27 Mobo : ASUS P5Q Pro Manny Desantos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cfcRebel Cream of the Crop ![]() 10,252 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX More info | Oct 04, 2008 13:39 | #28 System: Custom build Fee
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer ![]() 51,009 posts Likes: 369 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Oct 04, 2008 19:16 | #29 cfcRebel wrote in post #6436858 ![]() As you can see, i have the lowest end CPU for AMD socket 939. For those who just upgraded to quadcore and have a Athlon64 dualcore CPU (for socket 939) to spare, I'll be happy to buy it from you ![]() I upgraded from single core 3200+ to dual core 4800 and it made a MASSIVE difference, it more than doubled the speed. For you it'd do even more. Probably best to keep an eye on ebay. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jjaenagle Goldmember 1,506 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: richmond, va More info | Oct 04, 2008 22:18 | #30 ![]() As you can see, i have the lowest end CPU for AMD socket 939. For those who just upgraded to quadcore and have a Athlon64 dualcore CPU (for socket 939) to spare, I'll be happy to buy it from you . PM me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is abbeyroo 781 guests, 279 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |