playing with this technique,, yes or no ??
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | Sep 28, 2008 21:15 | #1 playing with this technique,, yes or no ?? Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Sep 28, 2008 21:16 | #2 Considering the subject, yes, I think it works nicely... Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
acchildress Senior Member 986 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | Sep 28, 2008 22:06 | #3 Yes, but only occasionally.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zazoh Goldmember 1,129 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: MICO - Texas More info | Sep 28, 2008 22:09 | #4 My test for these is to ask would the image stand on its own without processing, looks like it might, but would have loved to see the eyes. A Camera - A Lens -- Gear Doesn't Matter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zapins Senior Member 278 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Hamden, CT More info | Sep 28, 2008 22:59 | #5 I vote no. Makes the child look creepy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kauaicrazed Senior Member 778 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Orange County, Ca More info | Sep 28, 2008 23:38 | #6 It looks too cartoonish for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KatiaShermanPhotography Member 142 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: Springfield, Missouri More info | Sep 29, 2008 01:25 | #7 i would say no...when you do that his face became "dirty" (for the lack of better word) - its just too much for my taste www.KatiaShermanPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
milorad Senior Member 515 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: Melbourne, AU More info | Sep 29, 2008 03:01 | #8 consider fading some of the effect between this, and the normal exposure on the kid's face only.... to reduce the effect on the skin. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
azpix Goldmember 3,335 posts Likes: 19 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Chandler, Arizona USA More info | Sep 29, 2008 03:14 | #9 not a fan. Gear- 7d, 24-70L, sigma 70-200, Sigma 120-400, canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.0,sigma 10-20 and a DJI Mavic Pro Drone
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bluemist Member 131 posts Joined Dec 2007 More info | Sep 29, 2008 04:23 | #10 I vote NO! Looks garish....I'd like to see the original too
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks folks. i didnt really pay attention to the skin.so do you think going into photoshop and trying to blend in some of the original skin tone would help. not sure how to do that to make it come out ok. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mamabravo Goldmember 1,087 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: guelph ontario canada More info | Sep 29, 2008 13:08 | #12 it's good with textured stuff like buildings ect but not for people
LOG IN TO REPLY |
milorad Senior Member 515 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: Melbourne, AU More info | Sep 29, 2008 13:09 | #13 try putting the original on the edit, then fading it until the face looks less edited, but still shows the added contrast. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Meeshee Junior Member 27 posts Joined Sep 2008 More info | Sep 29, 2008 14:33 | #14 I would say no, but interesting to see.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phil.hearing Senior Member 741 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Sep 29, 2008 19:29 | #15 no doesnt look real Canon 5D MK1 | Holga 120s | EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS USM | EF 16 - 35mm f/2.8 L | EF 70 - 200MM F/2.8 USM IS L | Speedlite 580EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 510 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||