Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
Thread started 28 Sep 2008 (Sunday) 21:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

OPINIONS

 
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Sep 28, 2008 21:15 |  #1

playing with this technique,, yes or no ??

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/2008-05-15-2008-05-08wildlife-2952.jpg

Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Sep 28, 2008 21:16 |  #2

Considering the subject, yes, I think it works nicely...


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
acchildress
Senior Member
986 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Sep 28, 2008 22:06 |  #3

Yes, but only occasionally.



Come be a big fish in a little pond, help build
theanswerjar.com  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zazoh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,129 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: MICO - Texas
     
Sep 28, 2008 22:09 |  #4

My test for these is to ask would the image stand on its own without processing, looks like it might, but would have loved to see the eyes.


A Camera - A Lens -- Gear Doesn't Matter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zapins
Senior Member
Avatar
278 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Hamden, CT
     
Sep 28, 2008 22:59 |  #5

I vote no. Makes the child look creepy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kauaicrazed
Senior Member
778 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, Ca
     
Sep 28, 2008 23:38 |  #6

It looks too cartoonish for me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KatiaShermanPhotography
Member
Avatar
142 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Springfield, Missouri
     
Sep 29, 2008 01:25 |  #7

i would say no...when you do that his face became "dirty" (for the lack of better word) - its just too much for my taste


www.KatiaShermanPhotog​raphy.com (external link)
Canon 40D
Photoshop CS3
3 AlienBees with giant softboxes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
milorad
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne, AU
     
Sep 29, 2008 03:01 |  #8

consider fading some of the effect between this, and the normal exposure on the kid's face only.... to reduce the effect on the skin.

otherwise it's really kind of interesting, in a "my momma think's it's special" kind of way. :)


Gear List (external link) - Yeah baby.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
azpix
Goldmember
Avatar
3,335 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Chandler, Arizona USA
     
Sep 29, 2008 03:14 |  #9

not a fan.
whats the original look like?


Gear- 7d, 24-70L, sigma 70-200, Sigma 120-400, canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.0,sigma 10-20 and a DJI Mavic Pro Drone

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bluemist
Member
131 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Sep 29, 2008 04:23 |  #10

I vote NO! Looks garish....I'd like to see the original too




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Sep 29, 2008 06:45 as a reply to  @ Bluemist's post |  #11

thanks folks. i didnt really pay attention to the skin.so do you think going into photoshop and trying to blend in some of the original skin tone would help. not sure how to do that to make it come out ok.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamabravo
Goldmember
1,087 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: guelph ontario canada
     
Sep 29, 2008 13:08 |  #12

it's good with textured stuff like buildings ect but not for people

sorry




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
milorad
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne, AU
     
Sep 29, 2008 13:09 |  #13

try putting the original on the edit, then fading it until the face looks less edited, but still shows the added contrast.

then just use a fuzzy brush and erase everything except what you want to keep.


Gear List (external link) - Yeah baby.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Meeshee
Junior Member
27 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Sep 29, 2008 14:33 |  #14

I would say no, but interesting to see.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil.hearing
Senior Member
Avatar
741 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Sep 29, 2008 19:29 |  #15

no doesnt look real


Canon 5D MK1 | Holga 120s | EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS USM | EF 16 - 35mm f/2.8 L | EF 70 - 200MM F/2.8 USM IS L | Speedlite 580EX II |
www.philhearing.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,842 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
OPINIONS
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
510 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.