Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 30 Sep 2008 (Tuesday) 11:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New Lacie Monitor - Resolution?

 
Lyssi
Senior Member
439 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: NW Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 30, 2008 11:59 |  #1

After lurking on this forum, this very helpful thread inparticularly, https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=537386 I purchased a 20" Lacie 320. It has an A-TW-IPS panel (true white) and 12 bits. Sure looks good so far and I'm very happy with the 20" size.

The panel's optimal resolution is stated as 1600 x 1200. However, at that resolution I'm finding the text, thumbnails of my applications too small - I didn't expect that! (Lightroom especially)

Resolution is about size I understand... but is it not also about the detail and sharpness I will see on the screen? So if I lower the resolution to 1360 x 1024 am I also lowering the quality of the view of my photos?

Seems to defeat the purpose of a good monitor - can you help me with this.

Is there a way to adjust your applications so that they display a little larger and still maintain the highest resolution available?

Thanks / Pat


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillyR
Member
216 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Sep 30, 2008 12:13 |  #2

I have the same monitor and the same complaint. You can change the text size on the View menu in IE7, and the thumbnail sizes in Photoshop. However, the text size adjustment doesn't work for all sites, such as this one. In fact, I've noticed it works for very few. I'll be monitoring this thread for ideas too.


EOS 5D, 5D MK II, 20D
24-105L, 17-85 EF-S IS, 70-300 IS, 18-55, Sigma 12-24.
2-EX 580s, LC-5 Wireless Controller, ST-E2 Wireless Transmitter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Sep 30, 2008 12:13 |  #3

You may decrease the quality because it will still be displaying 1600x1200 because that's how many pixels it has. By running at 1360 x 1024 it's actually using about 1.2 actual pixels to display 1 pixel of your 1360 x 1024 resolution which can cause the image to appear blurred.

I don't want to sound horrible but have you had your eyes checked recently? I run a pair of 22" monitors at 1680x 1080 each and can see perfectly well and I have horrible eyesight and wear glasses.


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,667 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3297
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Sep 30, 2008 12:24 |  #4

HankScorpio wrote in post #6410193 (external link)
I don't want to sound horrible but have you had your eyes checked recently? I run a pair of 22" monitors at 1680x 1080 each and can see perfectly well and I have horrible eyesight and wear glasses.

i'd have to 2nd that.. i have dual display runnng 1600x1200 each, one on a 20.1" TFT the other on a 19" CRT.. and can read both fine (at arms reach away (34") and i have smaller than average txt running as well (7pt Verdana for menus etc)


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyssi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
439 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: NW Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 30, 2008 12:59 as a reply to  @ Bobster's post |  #5

Thanks for the pixel explanation Hank, now I understand that part of it and do need to stay at the highest resolution for editing photos.

Well now, lots of surprises with this monitor - eyesight! :) It just so happens I have an appt for that next week so will look into that. Maybe a change in Rx will help these older eyes... thanks! I can see everything but it's just not comfortable.

Another thought is that I can change to the larger resolution when I'm editing in the meantime.

Thanks for your suggstions too Billy, I'll look at what can be changed in LR. How's your eyesight...:)

Thanks again / Pat


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Sep 30, 2008 13:39 |  #6

You can also try and use Large Fonts in Windows. That should increase the font size for program menus etc.... I am also running a 20" monitor at 1600 x 1200 and HATE tiny print. Other than a few websites with tiny print (Dpreview)...I have no problems with any programs.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Sep 30, 2008 14:52 |  #7

Have a look at Jeffrey’s Lightroom Configuration Manager (external link).
You can change a lot, including text size.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jasonlitka
Senior Member
Avatar
900 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Exton, PA
     
Oct 01, 2008 10:01 |  #8

Bobster wrote in post #6410237 (external link)
i'd have to 2nd that.. i have dual display runnng 1600x1200 each, one on a 20.1" TFT the other on a 19" CRT.. and can read both fine (at arms reach away (34") and i have smaller than average txt running as well (7pt Verdana for menus etc)

+1, from someone who has a 15.4" notebook at 1920x1200 (a resolution typically reserved for 24" or larger monitors and high-def TVs).


Jason Litka | Philadelphia-Area Tech Executive/Consultant (external link)
Gear: iPhone. Yeah... Certainly don't own more than that... Don't tell my wife, ok?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Oct 01, 2008 10:15 |  #9

HankScorpio wrote in post #6410193 (external link)
...... have you had your eyes checked recently? I run a pair of 22" monitors at 1680x 1080 each and can see perfectly well and I have horrible eyesight and wear glasses.

Bobster wrote in post #6410237 (external link)
i'd have to 2nd that.. i have dual display runnng 1600x1200 each, one on a 20.1" TFT the other on a 19" CRT.. and can read both fine (at arms reach away (34") and i have smaller than average txt running as well (7pt Verdana for menus etc)

litkaj wrote in post #6416156 (external link)
+1, from someone who has a 15.4" notebook at 1920x1200 (a resolution typically reserved for 24" or larger monitors and high-def TVs).

But ... do any of you have 62 year old eyes? When I was young, my eyesight was sharp enough to see the proverbial gnat on a buffalo nickel (if you don't know what I am referring to, then I know that you are young and have youthful eyesight).


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillyR
Member
216 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Oct 01, 2008 10:45 |  #10

bill boehme wrote in post #6416237 (external link)
But ... do any of you have 62 year old eyes?

I'll see your 62 and raise you 12! :) Ah, for the good old days, when I had 20/20 uncorrected, which was a requirement for my job.

Actually, the small text on my LaCie 320 isn't a big problem, just a minor annoyance, but it would be nice to be able to increase the size of it on some sites a little bit. As I stated earlier, the View menu in IE 7 allows you to increase it, but it doesn't work on some sites, such as this one.


EOS 5D, 5D MK II, 20D
24-105L, 17-85 EF-S IS, 70-300 IS, 18-55, Sigma 12-24.
2-EX 580s, LC-5 Wireless Controller, ST-E2 Wireless Transmitter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 02, 2008 06:34 |  #11

BillyR wrote in post #6416402 (external link)
the View menu in IE 7 allows you to increase it, but it doesn't work on some sites, such as this one.

Firefox 3 does enlarge text on POTN ;)
And it's a nicer browser anyway IMO ...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillyR
Member
216 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Oct 02, 2008 08:33 |  #12

René Damkot wrote in post #6421969 (external link)
Firefox 3 does enlarge text on POTN ;)
And it's a nicer browser anyway IMO ...

Thanks for the tip, René. I previously had Firefox, but had not bothered to install it on my Vista computer that I got about 6 months ago. I've done so now, and sure enough you're right. My... er... somewhat mature eyes thank you, too!

I can now join you in recommending Firefox for those of us whose eyes could use a little help, as well as probably lots of other advantages.


EOS 5D, 5D MK II, 20D
24-105L, 17-85 EF-S IS, 70-300 IS, 18-55, Sigma 12-24.
2-EX 580s, LC-5 Wireless Controller, ST-E2 Wireless Transmitter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
symby
Member
134 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
     
Oct 02, 2008 09:26 |  #13

Try this, I believe it applies to all applications.

XP:
Right click on desktop
Settings Tab
Advanced button
On the General Tab - Change your DPI to 120 DPI instead of the default 96 dpi.

Vista:
Right click on desktop and Personalize
On the left hand side of the window it says "Adjust Font Size (DPI)". Click it.
Change it to the Larger Scale (120 DPI).

See if that helps any. In theory, it should enlarge the text for you, but keep most of the rest of things the same. I don't know exactly what will happen for each application.. depends on the people that wrote it. Hopefully it will be better for you.. it should for windows at least.


Canon 50D | Canon XTi | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Canon 70-200 f/4L IS | Sigma 10-20 | Canon 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyssi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
439 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: NW Ontario, Canada
     
Oct 02, 2008 11:21 as a reply to  @ symby's post |  #14

Oh Symby - that solved it!

Thank you so much, everything looks so much more normal now. In fact I may have to cut it back a bit, you are able to customize the DPI setting as well. Even this site is more easily readable.

I was on the computer most of yesterday and last night; between the larger pictures to get used to and the smaller text, my eyes are killing me today. What a relief! Now I can go back to enjoying this new monitor.

And thank you to everyone who contributed, all the suggestions will help to fine-tune things to our individual "older" eyes.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
symby
Member
134 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
     
Oct 02, 2008 11:58 |  #15

Happy I could help. :D


Canon 50D | Canon XTi | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Canon 70-200 f/4L IS | Sigma 10-20 | Canon 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,420 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
New Lacie Monitor - Resolution?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
483 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.