Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Member Activities 
Thread started 25 Feb 2006 (Saturday) 07:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Another Arizona POTN get together (2)?

 
this thread is locked
Blue-J
Member
Avatar
153 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Arizona
     
Apr 19, 2009 19:58 |  #9796

jbdavies wrote in post #7763639 (external link)
Just found my next TV for watching movies... Check this thing out... (external link) :shock: lol I'm in love...

Wait a few months... The new 4K pixel TVs are right around the corner. That thing is only 2K pixels.


Blue-J | Canon XTi | EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM (daily shooter), EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM (super telephoto), Sigma MACRO 105mm F2.8 EX DG, all with hoods and filters | Canon Speedlite 580EX | Brother MFC-8680DN Scanner | Lightroom 4.X (x64)
My favorite toy: http://********/MyBike

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbdavies
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,738 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Utah
     
Apr 19, 2009 19:59 |  #9797

Blue-J wrote in post #7763739 (external link)
Wait a few months... The new 4K pixel TVs are right around the corner. That thing is only 2K pixels.

Ok. :D


-Jeremy-
UPDATED!! www.sur-realphotography.com (external link) UPDATED!!
Facebook Profile (external link) | Facebook Page (external link)
Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hatch1921
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,500 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 954
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
     
Apr 19, 2009 20:48 |  #9798

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3503/3458023210_a885552e1f_o.jpg

Frank Hatcher Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbdavies
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,738 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Utah
     
Apr 19, 2009 20:49 |  #9799

Wow! The DoF is so shallow! Looks wonderful. :)


-Jeremy-
UPDATED!! www.sur-realphotography.com (external link) UPDATED!!
Facebook Profile (external link) | Facebook Page (external link)
Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hatch1921
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,500 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 954
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
     
Apr 19, 2009 20:51 |  #9800

jbdavies wrote in post #7764057 (external link)
Wow! The DoF is so shallow! Looks wonderful. :)

Thank you :) F/2.5... not much in focus. LOL


Frank Hatcher Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbdavies
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,738 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Utah
     
Apr 19, 2009 20:52 |  #9801

Hatch1921 wrote in post #7764079 (external link)
Thank you :) F/2.5... not much in focus. LOL

And all these were just with a reflector and diffuser? Both at the same time... or which ever you decided to use?


-Jeremy-
UPDATED!! www.sur-realphotography.com (external link) UPDATED!!
Facebook Profile (external link) | Facebook Page (external link)
Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hatch1921
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,500 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 954
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
     
Apr 19, 2009 20:56 |  #9802

jbdavies wrote in post #7764085 (external link)
And all these were just with a reflector and diffuser? Both at the same time... or which ever you decided to use?

Wedding dress.... full on sun... so... we used a diffusion panel over the top... a reflector for fill.

Rust shots... reflector to push light on her as she was in the shade.

Concrete series... just a reflector... she was in the shade.

A couple of other series... used the Ranger to light them... they didn't look good.... very hard to balance the white dress with the darker skin tones...

Very pleased with all the natural light stuff...

Garage door shot... a reflector from about 30ft away...again... she was in the shade.

At one point... used the silver reflector to push light in to the diffusion panel to get nice soft light on her.

Good times!


Frank Hatcher Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbdavies
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,738 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Utah
     
Apr 19, 2009 20:59 |  #9803

Hatch1921 wrote in post #7764109 (external link)
Wedding dress.... full on sun... so... we used a diffusion panel over the top... a reflector for fill.

Rust shots... reflector to push light on her as she was in the shade.

Concrete series... just a reflector... she was in the shade.

A couple of other series... used the Ranger to light them... they didn't look good.... very hard to balance the white dress with the darker skin tones...

Very pleased with all the natural light stuff...

Garage door shot... a reflector from about 30ft away...again... she was in the shade.

At one point... used the silver reflector to push light in to the diffusion panel to get nice soft light on her.

Good times!

That's intense. lol Definitely turned out very nice. :)


-Jeremy-
UPDATED!! www.sur-realphotography.com (external link) UPDATED!!
Facebook Profile (external link) | Facebook Page (external link)
Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hatch1921
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,500 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 954
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
     
Apr 19, 2009 21:04 |  #9804

jbdavies wrote in post #7764122 (external link)
That's intense. lol Definitely turned out very nice. :)

Not as bad as you think... it's a matter of looking at the eyes and seeing if you are getting the catchlights and the general lighting you want for the shot. We made plenty of mistakes... always do... great learning experience all around...


Frank Hatcher Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Apr 19, 2009 21:04 |  #9805

Hatch1921 wrote in post #7764145 (external link)
Not as bad as you think... it's a matter of looking at the eyes and seeing if you are getting the catchlights and the general lighting you want for the shot. We made plenty of mistakes... always do... great learning experience all around...

Are you using a hand-held meter for these sessions?


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hatch1921
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,500 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 954
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
     
Apr 19, 2009 21:06 |  #9806

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #7764148 (external link)
Are you using a hand-held meter for these sessions?

No sir... just keeping an eye on the exposures on the back of the camera.... at times I pushed the images 2 stops over just to get her face to expose properly...which... made things difficult when it came to the white dress shots... very good learning experience.


Frank Hatcher Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Apr 19, 2009 21:16 |  #9807

Hatch1921 wrote in post #7764157 (external link)
No sir... just keeping an eye on the exposures on the back of the camera.... at times I pushed the images 2 stops over just to get her face to expose properly...which... made things difficult when it came to the white dress shots... very good learning experience.

Far be it from me to tell you anything but...

You'd take a lot of the guesswork out of the process with a meter.

Light Skin, Dark Skin, Martian Skin... Doesn't matter what you're shooting.

1/125 @ f/2 ISO 100 is 1/125 @ f/2 ISO 100. The meter won't lie and can't be fooled by white clothing or dark skin (provided you're metering incident and not reflected light.)


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hatch1921
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,500 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 954
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
     
Apr 19, 2009 21:24 |  #9808

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #7764216 (external link)
Far be it from me to tell you anything but...

You'd take a lot of the guesswork out of the process with a meter.

Light Skin, Dark Skin, Martian Skin... Doesn't matter what you're shooting.

1/125 @ f/2 ISO 100 is 1/125 @ f/2 ISO 100. The meter won't lie and can't be fooled by white clothing or dark skin (provided you're metering incident and not reflected light.)

The situation....

Model has darker skin
Model is in bright white dress
Model is in the super duper bright Arizona sun.

So... we bring in a duffsion panel to soften the harsh light... drops the exposure on her face/hair by a stop or more...

We then have to push light back on her to get the catchlights.. .and the bring her to life...without blowing out the whites... the contrasting scene...with a meter or without... wouldn't make a difference IMO. I could have metered for the dress... then the face...and went with and average... but... something would have been under exposed or over exposed.

Or... am I missing something... I could bust out with the meter next time out...

The garage situation... full shade... darker skin tones... white dress... had to push the light back on her to expose for skin tones... starts to clip the whites...

It was a rough shoot... LOL


Frank Hatcher Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrianAZ
Goldmember
Avatar
1,550 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Apr 19, 2009 21:36 |  #9809

I think what Jay is saying, and I'd agree, is if the same light is hitting both the dress and her face, then there really should be one exposure. The problem is what makes a good looking exposure for both skin tones and the dress. From what you are saying, her skin looks best if it is overexposed a bit, and the dress needs to be somewhat underexposed to keep detail.

There are a few things you can do here. One of them is getting the diffusion panel closest to her face and further from the dress. That will bring into play the inverse square law and should keep her face brighter than the dress.


Website (external link)
My Blog (external link)
facebook (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hatch1921
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,500 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 954
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
     
Apr 19, 2009 22:10 |  #9810

BrianAZ wrote in post #7764327 (external link)
I think what Jay is saying, and I'd agree, is if the same light is hitting both the dress and her face, then there really should be one exposure. The problem is what makes a good looking exposure for both skin tones and the dress. From what you are saying, her skin looks best if it is overexposed a bit, and the dress needs to be somewhat underexposed to keep detail.

There are a few things you can do here. One of them is getting the diffusion panel closest to her face and further from the dress. That will bring into play the inverse square law and should keep her face brighter than the dress.

Sent a PM :)


Frank Hatcher Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

529,109 views & 0 likes for this thread, 76 members have posted to it.
Another Arizona POTN get together (2)?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Member Activities 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1291 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.