Has anyone had both of these lenses? Which one did you end up keeping? I just picked up a new Toke for about the same price as I bought my Wigma for used on the forum, so price isn't the issue here. I just wanted to know if anyone saw a significant increase in IQ between these two lenses and whether they found distortion to be better controlled in either one.
The loss of 17-20 isn't a big deal to me since I used the Wigma on 10-15mm 90% of the time. I do a lot of shooting indoors so the 2.8 of the Tokina is already a plus. Although when I do indoor shots I'll also usually have my 420ex, so the faster speed isn't a necessity, just a nice extra should I not have my flash with me. I'll also be using it for landscapes since I go hiking/kayaking fairly often.
Once the Toke arrives I'm going to have to decide which one to sell and it'd be nice to get everyone's opinion since I might not have time to do an exhaustive test. I've seen people comparing the Toke to the Canon 10-22, and the 10-22 compared to the Wigma, but not many posts comparing the Toke to the WIgma (I searched all the lens threads). Any help would be great. Thanks