Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 06 Oct 2008 (Monday) 19:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lexar or Sandisk?

 
Phillyguy
Member
220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Philly
     
Oct 06, 2008 19:38 |  #1

its that simple. i need some CF cards. what are you thoughts? also recommendations on specific cards. i was thinkin either 2gb or 4gb. what do you think?


http://www.facebook.co​m/ZachSantoPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Oct 06, 2008 19:46 |  #2

SanDisk...they are the standard that others hope to attain. That said, without knowing what camera you are using...it is real hard to recommend a good card. Most cameras are the limiting factor. (Go Phils!!!)


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Oct 06, 2008 19:47 |  #3

I use SanDisk. Lexar at least used to make cards that were less, flexible for want of a better word, as to camera lines they worked with. At one point, they had to issue a fix for their cards because they regularly trashed files on Canon cameras.I'm sure they aren't making that mistake any more, but old habits die hard.

Size-wise, I think 4 GB is pretty much ideal. Backs up to a single DVD, holds a reasonable number of shots but not so many you'll go crazy tracking them. If you shoot only JPEG, 2 GB would probably be fine too. But 4 GB is also a very good price per GB right now. I've just bought a couple of 8 GB cards, but I'll be using them mainly for when I know I'll be shooting a lot/


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phillyguy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
220 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Philly
     
Oct 06, 2008 19:56 |  #4

i am going to be using a 40D gripped. also should i get the 1350 hz batteries or the 1500hz batteries?


http://www.facebook.co​m/ZachSantoPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Oct 06, 2008 20:07 |  #5

The 4gb Extreme IIIs are the bargain today. That would be my choice...and a pair of batteries from Sterlingtek.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sports_Dude
Goldmember
1,112 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2008
Location: California
     
Oct 06, 2008 20:09 |  #6

I also use Sandisk. Recommend Extreme III or Ultra II depending on which is cheaper. 4GB will get you around 275 raw shots.


Sports_Dude
7D Gripped | 17-55 f/2.8 IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II | 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Crossfire
Senior Member
Avatar
464 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
     
Oct 06, 2008 20:13 |  #7

I use Sandisk 4GB CF and SD/SDHC cards. Don't think they sell Lexar cards locally down this part of the world


pointView | photography
www.pointviewphoto.co.​nz (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark
Dammit I need sleep
Avatar
3,386 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Oct 06, 2008 21:18 |  #8

On 40d extreme III is fast enough, ultra II is slower, no diff between ex III and IV (in my simple tests)

I just found this: http://www.robgalbrait​h.com …ti_page.asp?cid​=6007-9257 (external link)
it proves me wrong :)


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Oct 06, 2008 21:47 |  #9

Personally I only use the Sandisk Extreme III line of cards.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,387 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 409
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Oct 06, 2008 22:29 |  #10

I was using the Lexar Professional 2GB 133x speed on my XTi.
I decided to get new cards when I got my 40D.
Most of my local shops are now carrying SanDisk.
I have an Extreme III and the Ultra IV both 2 GB.
I will be buying the Extreme III in either the 2 or 4GB in the future.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sports_Dude
Goldmember
1,112 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2008
Location: California
     
Oct 07, 2008 00:12 |  #11

I've never noticed a difference between Sandisk Ultra IIs and Extreme IIIs. I have both and both meet my needs when taking sports photos.


Sports_Dude
7D Gripped | 17-55 f/2.8 IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II | 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maxdave
Goldmember
Avatar
1,162 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Chatham, Ontario, Canada
     
Oct 07, 2008 06:02 |  #12

Sports_Dude wrote in post #6451126 (external link)
I've never noticed a difference between Sandisk Ultra IIs and Extreme IIIs. I have both and both meet my needs when taking sports photos.

I agree ... I use Ultra IIs in my 40D, 50D and XTi. I switched to 4 GB cards for the 40D, and will probably go to a couple of 8 GB for the 50D. I like about 400 shots per card, maximum.

Maxdave


5D3,1D4,S90,6S&Moment Lenses,Hero4Silver,GPS​-E2,2x580EX,430EX,90EX,​EF16-35L f/4 IS,Samy SYTS24-C 24TS,EF24-105L IS,EF50 f/1.4,EF70-200 f/4L IS,EF300 f/4L IS,EF100-400L I IS,Kenko DGX 1.4X,Canon 2X TC Mk II, RRS&Pro-Media L-Brackets,Manfrotto MHXPRO-3WG & Roller 50,Sirui 306&K-20,Giottos MT-7371&MH-3300,Velbon ElCarmagne 530,CamRanger,Phottix&​Canon Remotes,Lowepro Backpack,ThinkTank Retro 20&Modular System,OpTech straps,Lexar/San Disk Cards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,300 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Lexar or Sandisk?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2843 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.