Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 06 Oct 2008 (Monday) 20:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Some help with profiles, please

 
elTwitcho
frustrating as ....
Avatar
1,478 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Oct 06, 2008 20:25 |  #1

So a while back I bought this laptop for photo editing, had colour problems.

Bought a pantone huey, had colour problems.

Read just about everything I could just to disable colour profiles, still have problems.

To be totally honest I've just about quit photography I've been son frustrated with it and I haven't shot a thing all summer. I went back to it tonight and remembered how disatisfied I've been and am just about ready to break my laptop.

The long and short of it is that no matter what I do, when I save to jpg all my shadow detail goes to pitch black. I'll have plenty of detail in PS, when I save to jpg it just cuts off to black. In a nutshell, this isn't workable.

When I was editing on a CRT I printed and my prints came out "close enough" that I was happy. Now that I've got a calibrator I can't get anything even useable and I've just about quit.

So, Adobe gamme, turned off.
Opened the pantone huey program at startup, don't open it at startup. Doesn't fix it.
Disabled profiles in photoshop, doesn't fix it.
Enabled profiles in photoshop, doesn't fix it.
Used monitor defaults, turned monitor defaults off. Doesn't fix it.


The entire business of ICC profiles doesn't even make sense to me as what it seems to do is give me a profile so that other people's systems can adjust to mine when what I want is for MY system to be adjusted to a more or less standard baseline profile like I had with my old CRT setup where I wasn't using profiles.

Can anyone offer a hand? Everything I've tried so far has done nothing at all and I'm not looking to get into anything complicated like embedded profiles I just want photoshop to stop radically altering my image every time I go to save for web.


Rich
Some of my recent projects
Portraits from 2007 (external link)
Urban Gallery (external link)
Where Toronto Was Built (external link)
People and such (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elTwitcho
THREAD ­ STARTER
frustrating as ....
Avatar
1,478 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Oct 06, 2008 20:30 |  #2

Oh and before anyone asks, yes I'm working in sRGB color space


Rich
Some of my recent projects
Portraits from 2007 (external link)
Urban Gallery (external link)
Where Toronto Was Built (external link)
People and such (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 06, 2008 20:32 |  #3

Post a picture.

Also until you've read this book (external link) (or something similar) you're flying blind. Read it.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elTwitcho
THREAD ­ STARTER
frustrating as ....
Avatar
1,478 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Oct 06, 2008 21:09 |  #4

Thanks for the reply Tim, if this helps, here's a prime example

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3262/2733210313_006c5be9a5_o.jpg

In photoshop there was very little black space when I was working on it.

And as for books, that's just the thing. I don't want to deal with this stuff, it's killing my enjoyment of photography. I understand for perfect results that you really need to know the theory of color management particularly if you want to start doing really advanced stuff like loading printer profiles and whatnot, but I don't. When I printed off mpix they came out close enough that it was only by holding the prints next to my monitor that you could really see any kind of difference, and that worked for me. I don't want to go into anything more advanced and I just want to shoot photos and process them in photoshop, something I'm unable to do presently.

Rich
Some of my recent projects
Portraits from 2007 (external link)
Urban Gallery (external link)
Where Toronto Was Built (external link)
People and such (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Oct 06, 2008 21:27 |  #5

I've enjoyed your shots for a long time and would hate to see you quit.....

I assume you've read this sticky? https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=296149

I agree with you that you should be able to calibrate the monitor/screen and get decent prints from a print shop. I did give up trying to print these images myself. The paper and ink was getting ridiculous just trying to get close to the right color.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 06, 2008 22:32 |  #6

That photo looks great to me, dark but I can see enough detail.

Post a screen shot of your color management setup in windows (or mac) and the PS color setup screen.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 07, 2008 07:25 |  #7

So, is the problem that you don't get a screen to print match, or that the images look different inside PS and for instance in a browser or other non color managed application?


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elTwitcho
THREAD ­ STARTER
frustrating as ....
Avatar
1,478 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Oct 07, 2008 07:45 |  #8

René Damkot wrote in post #6452194 (external link)
So, is the problem that you don't get a screen to print match, or that the images look different inside PS and for instance in a browser or other non color managed application?

The images look different going from color managed to non color managed applications. I have something I want to look at when I get home now that I think about it, I'll report back this afternoon.

I can understand color shifts from one space to the next, it's the drastic shift in contrast/black point that I'm finding unworkable since I like to work with alot of shadows.


Rich
Some of my recent projects
Portraits from 2007 (external link)
Urban Gallery (external link)
Where Toronto Was Built (external link)
People and such (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 07, 2008 10:32 |  #9

Okay.
There will *always* be a difference between color managed and not color managed programs.
If you want the images to look good on *your* screen (and only your screen!) you could turn off color management in PS, by selecting "monitor color" in the color settings.

A better option IMO might be to soft proof for "Monitor rgb" and adjust (using a curves adjustment layer) while softproofing. With a bit of experimenting, you might be able to create "one curve that fits all images".

In both cases, you image is likely to look somewhat off on other peoples display (whether color managed / calibrated or not), but in the second case, at least you also have a "properly color managed" version.

In both above cases the image should look *identical* in PS and in a non CM application.

If there is a very drastic difference between color managed and not color managed, I'd suspect something is off..
Your laptop should not be *that* far off sRGB contrast wise.

I can see shadow detail in the above image on my laptop, both with colormanagement on and off. Non color managed is a bit darker though.

How does the image print?


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,349 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Some help with profiles, please
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
551 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.