When I think "street photography", I think 28mm, 30mm, 35mm. Something in that range. I use the 16-35 mostly but I wish I had a 35/1.4
One thing with this type of photography is that you have to be sure to get close.
AdamLewis Goldmember 4,122 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Seattle, WA More info | When I think "street photography", I think 28mm, 30mm, 35mm. Something in that range. I use the 16-35 mostly but I wish I had a 35/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheHoff Don't Hassle.... 8,804 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Oct 08, 2008 16:02 | #17 If you plan on using zone focus, or hyperfocal, or anything past 5.6 or f/8... and you're not likely to be on the long end of the zoom... I'd say either lens will do. Not that I know anything about either lens, but you're not planning on using it at a demanding aperture so I can't see how there would be much difference in a street photography setting where you don't need perfect distortion correction or corner sharpness. ••Vancouver Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
re1ex Member 111 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: NYC More info | Oct 08, 2008 16:03 | #18 i'm pretty sure it doesn't come with those guides. perhaps we're thinking of different things. 5d, 17-40, 50 1.8, 85 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
re1ex Member 111 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: NYC More info | Oct 08, 2008 16:09 | #19 TheHoff wrote in post #6461563 If you plan on using zone focus, or hyperfocal, or anything past 5.6 or f/8... and you're not likely to be on the long end of the zoom... I'd say either lens will do. Not that I know anything about either lens, but you're not planning on using it at a demanding aperture so I can't see how there would be much difference in a street photography setting where you don't need perfect distortion correction or corner sharpness. i'm not at that level in photography to bring my camera up to my face and frame in the middle of the street YET. so i hip shoot. AF is out of the question for me that way. 5d, 17-40, 50 1.8, 85 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheHoff Don't Hassle.... 8,804 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Oct 08, 2008 16:50 | #20 re1ex wrote in post #6461608 i'm not at that level in photography to bring my camera up to my face and frame in the middle of the street YET. so i hip shoot. AF is out of the question for me that way. You can use autofocus. I shoot from the hip still at times with a 5D and 16-35. If it is a bright enough day, I'll let the camera select the focus point. Since it normally will key off of whatever object is the closest, and that is generally your subject, the hit rate is pretty good. If it is too dull out, though, the outer points will fail and you're better off sticking it on center. ••Vancouver Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ISimonius Weather Sealed Photographer 6,508 posts Gallery: 19 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 49 Joined Feb 2005 Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes More info | Oct 08, 2008 17:11 | #21 40Driggs wrote in post #6461188 I am planning on doing some street photography work to help out the Bachelor of Social Work Student Association that I am a part of and was wondering what lenses the street photographers on this forum would recommend. I am shooting with a 40D, and am on a pretty limited budget since I will be a student for the next couple of years. I currently only have the 28-135mm and the 50mm f/1.8. I would like to get something at the wide end to compliment the 28-135, and was thinking about picking up a Tokina 12-24 for wide shots. I also am considering the 17-55 f/2.8 IS, but it is double the price and not as wide. Would I be better off going for more on the wide end, or more on the long end? What lens do you prefer for general shooting? all I would say is keep it simple for the street. Most of my street shots on a crop camera would have been on a 50mm or 85, which you already have covered. Will you really take enough wide shots to warrent a new lens?? Veni, Vidi, Snappi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
souladdikt Member 54 posts Joined Mar 2007 More info | Oct 08, 2008 18:53 | #22 For general shooting I prefer a normal prime. I'd look into the Sigma 30 1.4 if you're on a budget or 35L if you're feeling spendy (you mentioned the 17-55 which is up there in price). Shooting on the street at dusk/night is fun with a fast prime. http://flickr.com/photos/souladdikt/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nordstern1 Goldmember 1,303 posts Joined Nov 2007 More info | Oct 08, 2008 20:32 | #23 TheHoff wrote in post #6461838 You can use autofocus. I shoot from the hip still at times with a 5D and 16-35. If it is a bright enough day, I'll let the camera select the focus point. Since it normally will key off of whatever object is the closest, and that is generally your subject, the hit rate is pretty good. If it is too dull out, though, the outer points will fail and you're better off sticking it on center. sorry for being off-topic but i just need to ask...is hip shooting a common practice for street photographers? JOE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheHoff Don't Hassle.... 8,804 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Oct 08, 2008 20:35 | #24 nordstern1 wrote in post #6463004 sorry for being off-topic but i just need to ask...is hip shooting a common practice for street photographers? It is an easy way to start and sometimes the only time to get the shot without changing the scene. ••Vancouver Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nordstern1 Goldmember 1,303 posts Joined Nov 2007 More info | Oct 08, 2008 21:10 | #25 thanks man! ive been trying out street photography since i like candid shots of people, urban architecture, the hustle & bustle of daily life... JOE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sounds like I might be good with my current setup to start out, which is good. I do mostly wildlife, so I am really wanting to save up for a 100-400 or 300 f/4. I am still debating between these lenses....I will probably get a Tokina 12-24 in the future, which I think would make a good lens when I need the wider angle, but for now it will probably not be my #1 priority. Just a thought from Daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsaraleksi Goldmember 1,653 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA More info | Oct 08, 2008 23:47 | #27 It has been my experience that the 35 1.4 is a marvelous lens for shooting on the street, and for an EF-S camera I think the Sigma 30 1.4 would also be a great choice though I do not have personal experience with it. --Alex Editorial Portfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Oct 09, 2008 06:33 | #28 It depends what you mean by street photography. I wouldn't think of shooting SP without my 70-200. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The_Camera_Poser Goldmember 3,012 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Oct 09, 2008 06:57 | #29 Permanent banIt ain't the best lens in the world, but the Canon 28/2.8 is CHEAP and does a reasonable job.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1102 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||