Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Nov 2002 (Tuesday) 05:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro (non-USM)???

 
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Nov 12, 2002 05:33 |  #1

Hi everyone!

Has anyone had any experience with this lens? It's the older, micromotor AF version that I am asking about. I know the AF will be slower, but am mainly interested in it for the macro capability and as a portrait lens.

So, how are the optics? How about the general build of the lens? Anything I should watch out for?

Thanks in advance,


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gmitchel
Senior Member
306 posts
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
     
Nov 12, 2002 08:59 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Rudi wrote:
Hi everyone!

Has anyone had any experience with this lens? It's the older, micromotor AF version that I am asking about. I know the AF will be slower, but am mainly interested in it for the macro capability and as a portrait lens.

So, how are the optics? How about the general build of the lens? Anything I should watch out for?

Thanks in advance,

Rudi:

I have no experience with the lens.

I can tell you that AF has almost zero utility in macro work.

First, AF tends to have have problems finding focus. Second, if you want to maintain a fixed image size, you'll need to keep the lens focus fixed and move the camera with a macro slider.

Have fun!

Cheers,

Mitch




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EA6B
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Sep 2002
     
Nov 12, 2002 09:46 |  #3

I have this lens, I bought it used many years ago. It is solidly built. The front element is recessed so you don't need a hood. This lens is "L" quality. It is tack sharp. It actually may be too sharp for portraits!

E




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Nov 12, 2002 15:36 |  #4

Yes, I have heard that many times now, through my research about it! Sounds good to me! (I can always soften them up later :D).

I have bought the lens and should have it by the end of the week. I will post samples eventually... :)

To all who replied, thanks for your help. If anyone else has any views or opinions about the lens, I'm still listening... :)


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jd_D60
Member
120 posts
Joined Jul 2002
     
Nov 13, 2002 15:17 |  #5

Rudi

I have this lens, I considered the USM version but as suggested its nearly always used in manual so I figured the extra £100 wasn't worth it.

The lens in AF can hunt a lot, another good reason to leave it in Manual.

I find it a little too big for portraits, infact my hitherto unused 50mm f1.8 Mk1 has never been used so much, this seems to be an ideal focal length and its cheap.

Get the 100mm Macro lens for Macro work you won't regret it.

regards
John




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rootcausefound
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined May 2002
     
Nov 14, 2002 02:11 |  #6

Hi Rudy,

So you already bought it! Probably you don't need any examples any more but here are my example shots.

http://www.pbase.com/i​mage/7286049/original.​jpg (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/i​mage/7286040/original.​jpg (external link)
Those are huge. About 1.6MB.

Those are not good examples, but you can see how it performs.

I also use that lens to copy slides and some negatives with D60.

Here are slides copy examples.
http://www.pbase.com/r​ootcausefound/halebopp (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/r​ootcausefound/67_image​s (external link)

And more realistic examples.
http://www.pbase.com …efound/from_ore​gon&page=3 (external link)
All except last 3 in that page were taken with this lens.

Enjoy your new lens.

Yasu




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Nov 14, 2002 19:13 |  #7

Thanks everyone who replied! Much appreciated! :)

The lens arrived today, and I'm just about to start playing with it.... I'll get back to you! :D


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Nov 22, 2002 18:26 |  #8

Well, I've had a short play in between work commitments, and here are a couple of shots.

Both of these were shot "quick and dirty", handheld, just to demonstrate the capabilities of the lens. They do not aim to be artistic or anything, and a much better result should be obtainable with a little patience and a tripod... :D They are not crops, but resized originals!

The first one is close-up of my cellular phone. Now, I have one of these tiny new cellulars, so the area captured is about 3/4 of an inch wide, no more:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


And this second one is a close-up of a pocket watch. Notice the scratches on the little latch!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,755 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro (non-USM)???
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1068 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.