Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 12 Oct 2008 (Sunday) 17:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How do you eliminate facial shadows with bounce flash?

 
timrocks311
Senior Member
289 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: PA
     
Oct 12, 2008 17:22 |  #1

I just received my 430ex flash on Wednesday and i've been playing around with it a bit. I've also read all the flash photography tutorials in the flash equipment forum.

Using it, I've realized how nice it is to be able to bounce the flash off the ceiling but i'm wondering how you all go about getting rid of facial shadows under someone's chin or nose. I read about sticking a white index card on the flash to try and deflect some of the light forward and it works okay. but does anyone have another method that maybe works better? I've also read that you don't want to point the flash directly forward, and angling it slightly, it might not be as effective.

here's a shot i was able to get using the index card.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


70D | 18-35 Art | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 100L
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scnapper
Senior Member
Avatar
499 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Western Australia
     
Oct 12, 2008 19:34 |  #2

Using a flash indoors a photographer showed me that by pointing the flash backwards (away) from the subject eliminated shadows on the face. She took three photos with the flash facing the subject, bouncing off the ceiling and away from the subject and the only photo without shadows was the backward facing flash.


Gone out

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ G
I feel thoroughly satisfied
Avatar
12,255 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Australia.
     
Oct 12, 2008 19:44 |  #3

You can bounce it off a wall behind you or just use a larger index card. There's quite a few products out there which will give you a larger card surface to reflect more light forwards - you can just use a piece of white cardboard or plastic to give the same effect, though. Experiment!


Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios​.com.au (external link) Reviews & Hotlinks: Domke F-3x - Pelican 1510/1514 (external link) & 1610/1614 (external link) - DIY Variable Length OC-E3 - Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home (external link) - FA-100 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 13, 2008 08:55 as a reply to  @ Jim G's post |  #4

Move back! One of the best ways to eliminate shadows is to move further away from your subject. This allows the light to be distributed more evenly throughout the room and bounce off more walls before reaching your subject. I use a Stofen indoors with good success as well.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timrocks311
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
289 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: PA
     
Oct 13, 2008 09:45 |  #5

thanks for the comments.

Mike, i bought a Stofen but haven't really used it yet. do you use it while you bounce the flash or just head-on? i guess it would diffuse the light some more...i'll have to try it when i get home.


70D | 18-35 Art | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 100L
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 13, 2008 11:18 |  #6

timrocks311 wrote in post #6487241 (external link)
thanks for the comments.

Mike, i bought a Stofen but haven't really used it yet. do you use it while you bounce the flash or just head-on? i guess it would diffuse the light some more...i'll have to try it when i get home.

I only use it indoors when I am bouncing the flash. I typically point the flash wither straight up or at the 75 degree mark. The Stofen will help to throw some light forward, while sending the majority of the light up and some more to adjacent side walls.

Try some tests. Take a stuffed animal or something that will cause the same shadow problems you are having. Use the Stofen at varying angles and adjust your distance to the subject to see which you prefer.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2112
Senior Member
863 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Oct 13, 2008 12:49 as a reply to  @ In2Photos's post |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

Buy a diffusion screen or mini softbox from Lumiquest, problem solved.


40D,Tamron 28-75 f/2.8,Nifty Fifty,Vixia HV30 HD

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dermit
Goldmember
1,815 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 174
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Chandler, Arizona
     
Oct 13, 2008 14:49 |  #8

In2Photos wrote in post #6486954 (external link)
Move back! One of the best ways to eliminate shadows is to move further away from your subject. This allows the light to be distributed more evenly throughout the room and bounce off more walls before reaching your subject. I use a Stofen indoors with good success as well.

...actually quite the opposite is true. A light quality on a subject gets harsher (more defined shadows/hard edges) the further away you are. Also the smaller the light source the harsher the shadows as well. So just by backing up, but keeping proper exposure, is going to make your shadows worse, not better. The closer the light source is to your subject (and the larger) the more 'wrap-around' effect you get which softens the shadows. I know this sounds counter intuitive to most people but it is true.

What i think you were getting at is only when bouncing a flash. Then further back would make it better and i agree. Here is why.... given the item you are bouncing off is the same distance to the subject but you move the light further away then that item you are bouncing off of will receive and distribute a wider more diffuse light and therefore soften the shadows. So in effect you are just make the light source bigger. And bigger is softer, given the same distance.

Now if you are moving back and now bouncing off the ceiling instead of being in close and shooting direct, that's another story. But all things equal... more distance equals harsher light/shadows.

Think about it. Given the same angle and proper exposure a light source striking a subject further away will be less able to bounce light back into the shadows because of fall-off from the surfaces it is bouncing off from. Put the light source closer to the subject and the bounced light from the surrounding environment is also closer and more able to bounce light back into the shadows thus softening them. This is why in studio shots you will often see big softboxes and they are placed relatively close to the subject, you get more wrap-around than if they were further away.


5DmkII, 5DmkIII, 5DS R, 15mm, 16-35 f/2.8 II L, 100 Macro f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, 580EX II, 580EX, 550EX
http://www.pixelcraftp​hoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Oct 14, 2008 08:06 |  #9

Dermit wrote in post #6488733 (external link)
...actually quite the opposite is true. A light quality on a subject gets harsher (more defined shadows/hard edges) the further away you are. Also the smaller the light source the harsher the shadows as well. So just by backing up, but keeping proper exposure, is going to make your shadows worse, not better. The closer the light source is to your subject (and the larger) the more 'wrap-around' effect you get which softens the shadows. I know this sounds counter intuitive to most people but it is true.

What i think you were getting at is only when bouncing a flash. Then further back would make it better and i agree. Here is why.... given the item you are bouncing off is the same distance to the subject but you move the light further away then that item you are bouncing off of will receive and distribute a wider more diffuse light and therefore soften the shadows. So in effect you are just make the light source bigger. And bigger is softer, given the same distance.

Now if you are moving back and now bouncing off the ceiling instead of being in close and shooting direct, that's another story. But all things equal... more distance equals harsher light/shadows.

Think about it. Given the same angle and proper exposure a light source striking a subject further away will be less able to bounce light back into the shadows because of fall-off from the surfaces it is bouncing off from. Put the light source closer to the subject and the bounced light from the surrounding environment is also closer and more able to bounce light back into the shadows thus softening them. This is why in studio shots you will often see big softboxes and they are placed relatively close to the subject, you get more wrap-around than if they were further away.

Ron, I think you misunderstood my post (and this thread). We are speaking of bouncing the flash indoors which uses the walls and ceiling as the light source for the subject, not direct flash. Moving back from your subject will often times allow more wall behind the photographer to be "visible" to the subject, therefore increasing the apparent size of the light source.

Here is my quote again for good measure.

In2Photos wrote in post #6486954 (external link)
Move back! One of the best ways to eliminate shadows is to move further away from your subject. This allows the light to be distributed more evenly throughout the room and bounce off more walls before reaching your subject. I use a Stofen indoors with good success as well.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Danger ­ Mouse
Member
112 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
Oct 14, 2008 16:47 |  #10

I like bouncing my flash into corners. Specifically where the ceiling and 2 walls meet. Then it reflects the light back in multiple directions. It works well in smaller rooms to reduce shadows. I have not tried it in a large rooms.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dapeegoo
Member
130 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Oct 14, 2008 17:17 |  #11

gary fong or joe demb will do the trick.


I shoot weddings nationwide // Wayne and Angela Photographers (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Just ­ Be
Goldmember
Avatar
1,449 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Seattle area
     
Oct 14, 2008 17:25 |  #12

2112 wrote in post #6488163 (external link)
Buy a diffusion screen or mini softbox from Lumiquest, problem solved.

+1 for mini soft box. The Westcott is fantastic!



6D, 60D, Various L and non-L Lenses and more gear than I have time to use. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
queenbee288
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,610 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Stanford, Ky
     
Oct 14, 2008 19:44 |  #13

Just Be wrote in post #6495978 (external link)
+1 for mini soft box. The Westcott is fantastic!

-1 for the mini softbox. I have the Westcott and I found it to be a waste of money.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryant35
Goldmember
Avatar
4,389 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 459
Joined May 2007
Location: Cypress, CA
     
Oct 14, 2008 21:39 |  #14

Point the flash up and lift out the diffuser screen and leave it pointing up so it reflects a some light forward. The manual calls it something like catch light for eyes, or something like that...



5DMK4, 7DMK2, 24-104mm f/4 L, 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS MK2, 17-40mm f/4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 35mm f/1.4,1.4X & 2X TC III 580EXII
www.ryantorresphotogra​phy.com (external link)Photography Facebook Fan Page (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,719 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: newcastle.nsw.au
     
Oct 15, 2008 03:42 |  #15

ryant35 wrote in post #6497330 (external link)
Point the flash up and lift out the diffuser screen

Does the 430 have that? Or only the 580?


[gallery (external link)|gear|flickr (external link)|blog (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,536 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
How do you eliminate facial shadows with bounce flash?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1259 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.