Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 14 Oct 2008 (Tuesday) 19:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Please help

 
cactus ­ hugger
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Oct 2008
     
Oct 14, 2008 19:09 |  #1

A close friend will shortly photograph a wedding of a Black and White couple. She has asked me to find out what techniques she might use to compensate for the differences in skin tones of the couple, the wedding party and of course both families.

She will be shooting groups and individuals outdoors close to sunset. The ceremony and reception will be indoors. She has a Canon XTi. She's planning on purchasing a 580EX2 speedlight to use for this gig.

Recent photos she's taken of couples with markedly differing skin tones and previous 35mm experiences lead her to believe that she will have one heck of a job compensating for the large differences in skin colors.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Oct 14, 2008 22:24 |  #2

Tell her to shoot RAW.
She might want to use +1 compensation.
She should expose for the dress. The camera's meter will want to make the dress gray.
If she has photoshop, she will be able to compensate with fill or shadow and highlight. Dodging and burning in post processing will be helpful.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Oct 14, 2008 22:56 |  #3

If you meter for the dress, you will under expose by quite a bit, in my experience.

Yes, meter for the dress but add at least +1, even +2 compensation. That should be easy to test before the wedding.

If the exposure is correct, using natural light, there is no need to compensate. You run into trouble when you meter of very dark objects or very light ones. In the first, you will overexpose, in the second, underexpose.

You need to find something in every shot that is as close to mid grey in reflection as possible. Not always easy.

Fot the flash I would add +1/3 FEC. You could go to +2/3....

Of course, shoot RAW.

It's not easy.... trial and error is the best teacher.... unfortunately it does not sound like there will not be enough ime to "fool around" with the flash before the wedding. Using a flash is not something for the uninitiated, also.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Oct 14, 2008 23:01 |  #4

An incident meter will work wonders.
I didn't mean to have the camera meter for the dress.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griptape
Goldmember
2,037 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Home
     
Oct 15, 2008 08:27 |  #5

Shooting manual and metering off your own hand and ignoring what the on camera light meter says when it's actually pointed at your subject usually gets you very close to proper exposure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Oct 15, 2008 09:01 |  #6

good advice from griptape. You might want to experiment first to figure out if you need to compensate a little when using that method.
Still warm here griptape. Is it cool up there yet?


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griptape
Goldmember
2,037 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Home
     
Oct 15, 2008 10:10 |  #7

Hey poloman, it's actually gorgeous here. We're around 68-74, and have been for about a week. A good bit of rain with it, but you couldn't ask for nicer weather overall. My windows are open for the fresh air, and it's just awesome.

But back to the OP, metering off your hand when using flash is definitely something that takes practice, as your flash is a whole different beast when used manually. If there's any way to practice in similar lighting conditions ahead of time, it would do a world of good. I guess I'm basically saying don't expose for black OR white, expose for the middle, and both will be close. And if you shoot raw, just post process for the bride, because we all know no one cares about the groom. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Oct 15, 2008 11:43 |  #8

Beautiful here too.
If the bride is happy, the world is a happy place.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Oct 15, 2008 12:53 |  #9

Amazing how everyone assumes the wedding dress will be white.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rooeey
-Shorty-
Avatar
2,554 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
     
Oct 15, 2008 13:33 |  #10

And wouldn't it make life easy if it wasn't ?


1D MK111 , 5D Classic,24-70F2.8, 16-35F2.8, 70-200F2.8 IS a 430EXII 2x 580EXII and a Mac...:cool:
http://s229.photobucke​t.com/albums/ee124/roo​eey/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dermit
Goldmember
1,815 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 174
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Chandler, Arizona
     
Oct 15, 2008 13:41 |  #11

So is the groom black and the bride white? One thing you can do... along with all the suggestions here, is get your flash off camera and place the groom/dark skin person closer to the flash than the white dress/light skin person. It will help a little.


5DmkII, 5DmkIII, 5DS R, 15mm, 16-35 f/2.8 II L, 100 Macro f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, 580EX II, 580EX, 550EX
http://www.pixelcraftp​hoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 15, 2008 14:14 |  #12

poloman wrote in post #6497590 (external link)
She should expose for the dress.

bohdank wrote in post #6497791 (external link)
meter for the dress but add at least +1, even +2 compensation.

I'd hope you both mean the same?

IMO "Expose for" the dress, means metering a part of the dress (assuming it's white) that should be bright white (just retaining detail), and set your exposure so that your (spot) meter indicates about +2. (I'd call that "meter the dress, and set +2 exposure compensation")

All the other tones should fall into place, assuming the contrast of the lighting is okay...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AndreaBFS
Goldmember
1,345 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
     
Oct 15, 2008 14:18 |  #13

Titus213 wrote in post #6500938 (external link)
Amazing how everyone assumes the wedding dress will be white.

You are easily amazed!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Redfish
Senior Member
784 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Florida - panhandle
     
Oct 15, 2008 14:21 |  #14

For starters - if you shoot with a custom white balance you will start in a much better place (gray card or expodisc or what ever) THen follow the advice above


Canon 1DXIII (2) Eos R 5R on the way 15-600 /1.2 - 5.6
6000ex's Bee's and boxes & PW's
RRS tripods and heads

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Oct 15, 2008 14:38 |  #15

AndreaBFS wrote in post #6501328 (external link)
You are easily amazed!

Yeah, probably so. It keeps my life interesting though.;)


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,230 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Please help
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2721 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.