Not going to run and buy one yet but I am wondering if people (especially former 40D users) can see a difference with the 50D all cross type AF??
Oct 16, 2008 03:09 | #1 Not going to run and buy one yet but I am wondering if people (especially former 40D users) can see a difference with the 50D all cross type AF?? http://natureimmortal.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
derky82 Senior Member 667 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Florence, SC More info | Oct 16, 2008 03:22 | #2 From what I've heard so far... The AF is bad, the build quality is laughable, its prone to Err. 99, and the jog wheel "feels funny". Not sure what to do with this space yet... but in the meantime, here's my Little Bitty Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | Oct 16, 2008 05:12 | #3 |
movado242 Member 124 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Columbus, OH More info | Oct 16, 2008 05:31 | #4 just got one yesterday ... i will be shooting a pro hockey game friday night with it and 40D..i'll know more after that.. john
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | I couldn't tell firsthand since mine went fubar right out of the box. Some of the guys over naturescapes.net are reporting better AF tracking with BIF, over their 40D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 16, 2008 07:36 | #6 OK, cheers guys. I'll check Naturescapes out, haven't visited in a while. http://natureimmortal.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LarryWeinman Goldmember 1,438 posts Likes: 66 Joined Jul 2006 More info | Oct 16, 2008 07:43 | #7 I thought it was about the same as my 40D until I put my 300mm f 2.8 with a 2X TC on. 7D Mark II 6D 100mm f 2.8 macro 180mm f 3.5 macro, MP-E-65 300mm f 2.8 500mm f4 Tokina 10-17mm fisheye 10-22mm 17-55mm 24-105mm 70-300mm 70-200 f 2.8 Mk II 100-400mm Mk II 1.4 TCIII 2X TCIII 580EX II 430 EX II MT 24 EX Sigma 150-600
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gdykstra Goldmember 1,330 posts Best ofs: 1 Likes: 190 Joined May 2007 Location: Duluth, Georgia More info | I can only speak of the difference between the the 30D and 50D, and that difference is very noticeable, with the 50D being much improved. Model Mayhem
LOG IN TO REPLY |
snails "I used the last of it to tip the strippers." 1,517 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Ann Arbor, MI More info | Oct 16, 2008 10:54 | #9 Neilyb wrote in post #6504957 Not going to run and buy one yet but I am wondering if people (especially former 40D users) can see a difference with the 50D all cross type AF?? The AF system is the same between the 40D and 50D. Attached is a graphic from the 40D white paper, describing the difference between the 40D/50D AF and the 30D/XTi/XSi AF Canon EOS 7D • EOS 5D Mark II • EOS 40D • PowerShot G10 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM • EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM • EF 50mm f/1.4 USM • EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM • EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM • EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 | Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX | Canon Speedlite 270 EX • Speedlite 430 EX | Sigma EF 500 DG Super
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TopGear1Ds Senior Member 600 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA More info | Oct 16, 2008 10:58 | #10 |)\/8 wrote in post #6506083 I can only speak of the difference between the the 30D and 50D, and that difference is very noticeable, with the 50D being much improved. It's not day and night, but I've also noticed improved af servo speed shooting sports with the 50D vs. my old 30D. --Matt--
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 16, 2008 12:24 | #11 I shot with a 40D and 50D at Road Atlanta early this month and I found a very noticeable difference between the two bodies when they both had my 70-200 2.8L attached. The 50D feels very confident in the way it focuses while the 40D wasn't as smooth and would occasionally be confused and go nuts. haha It could be a coincidence that this never happened with the 50D, but when it doesn't happen (to my memory) after well over 1000 shots in the same conditions, I attribute that to being a better system. - Kevin Kevin DiOssi Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Master-9 Senior Member 764 posts Joined May 2005 Location: Decatur, Ga. More info | Oct 16, 2008 12:28 | #12 Neilyb wrote in post #6504957 Not going to run and buy one yet but I am wondering if people (especially former 40D users) can see a difference with the 50D all cross type AF?? Both have all cross type AF From Decatur Georgia(USA)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 16, 2008 15:01 | #13 See this thread for my observations comparing my 40D to 50D's AF. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MDteX Senior Member 310 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth More info | Oct 16, 2008 15:11 | #14 And my comment in that thread about the focus speed/accuracy of the 50D. Canon 1DMkIV, Canon 1DMkIII, Canon 50D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 17, 2008 06:34 | #15 Good to know, cheers guys. http://natureimmortal.blogspot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1116 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||