Hey does anyone know if the lowepro mini trekker aw holds a 40D w/grip attached with a lens also attached? let me know.
thanks in advance
phillguy
Oct 16, 2008 22:07 | #1 Hey does anyone know if the lowepro mini trekker aw holds a 40D w/grip attached with a lens also attached? let me know. http://www.facebook.com/ZachSantoPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woolburr Rest in peace old friend. 66,487 posts Gallery: 115 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 143 Joined Sep 2005 Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC! More info | Oct 16, 2008 22:29 | #2 Yes....no problem...I have one. People that know me call me Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
neilwood32 Cream of the Crop 6,231 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland More info | Oct 17, 2008 05:39 | #3 Ive got a 400d with grip and sigma 18-50 f2.8(beast of a lens) which fits perfectly in the top divider.On top of that, ive got another 2 lenses (18-55 kit and sigma 70-300) as well as a large flash, rocket blower, filters, leads etc all within the main pocket. Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike ugly when I'm sober More info | Oct 17, 2008 05:55 | #4 I have my gripped 30D with 70-200 2.8 L IS attached and there's still room for something to go in at the end. With this I also have 430EX, Sigma 10-20mm, Sigma 30mm, rocket blower and other bits n bobs. My ungripped 20D + 24-70 lens alas has to travel separately! www.mikegreenphotography.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Oct 17, 2008 09:18 | #5 Personally when I had the Mini Trekker and a gripped body I thought the Mini Trekker wasn't tall enough for the height of the body with grip. Now, without a grip its perfect, but it was just a tad too tight for my taste. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike ugly when I'm sober More info | Oct 17, 2008 09:23 | #6 Yes, you're right. I'm looking for a new bag myself as it's not big enough for everything now. It was fine before I got the 70-200 but now it just won't all go in! www.mikegreenphotography.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 17, 2008 10:08 | #7 ok damn cause i am getting a 70-200 before my trip, in about a month. this i what i am taking. http://www.facebook.com/ZachSantoPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2957 guests, 129 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||