marcus769 Senior Member 642 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Minnesota More info | Oct 18, 2008 01:12 | #1 I was shooting with my 70-200mm 2.8 IS lens and really am disapointed with my pics.. 7D, 40D, 28-135mm IS, 50mm 1.8 II, 100mm 2.8L, 70-200mm 2.8L IS, 580 ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
j2photography Senior Member  476 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Mundelein, IL More info | Oct 18, 2008 01:45 | #2 post pics for reference. FLICKR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeesaB "Patience is a what? "  14,682 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: It's just St. Louis now! More info |
swampler Senior Member  879 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Middle TN More info | Oct 18, 2008 09:49 | #4 Sounds like they were way underexposed and brought up, maybe automatically, in your post software. Without pics, though, there's no way to know. Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Svetlana Goldmember  3,357 posts Likes: 11 Joined May 2008 Location: Calgary, AB More info | Oct 18, 2008 11:25 | #5 Any pics as example? Canon 7D, 5Dmk2, 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, Canon 50 1.2L, 35 1.4L, 85 1.8, Canon 16-35L, Canon 100 2.8L IS Macro, Speedlight 580EX II x 2, 430 EX, enthusiasm.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1172 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
