Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 19 Oct 2008 (Sunday) 15:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Eye problems

 
sarahbn
Member
63 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 19, 2008 15:05 |  #1

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v426/sarahbn/September%20-October%202008/Mt%20Gretna/IMG_0600_edited-1.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Oct 19, 2008 15:08 |  #2

Not sure I understand the title of this thread. Can you explain?

Also the shot is out of focus. Unless that's the point of the title?


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sarahbn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
63 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 19, 2008 15:47 as a reply to  @ Anke's post |  #3

His eyes are glowing I can't get natural looking eyes




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shannyD
"...in too much trouble"
Avatar
5,219 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit.
     
Oct 19, 2008 15:48 |  #4

if you have photoshop or something like it.. you can clone that part out.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sarahbn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
63 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 19, 2008 15:53 as a reply to  @ shannyD's post |  #5

I have elements but I always have trouble with the eyes They never look natural.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Oct 19, 2008 15:58 |  #6

Are you using a flash? That could be the problem, especially at dawn or dusk.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wazza
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,627 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
     
Oct 19, 2008 16:09 |  #7

You did use the flash, 400mm, and 1/250th.. Looks a bit soft, maybe increase the ISO to 800 to double the shutter speed

:)


New Zealand Photography Tours (external link) | Williams Photography - Queenstown Wedding Photography (external link) |
Instagram (external link) | Facebook - Weddings (external link) | Facebook - Landscapes + Tours (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sarahbn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
63 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 19, 2008 17:33 as a reply to  @ Wazza's post |  #8

Thanks I will try that next time.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shannyD
"...in too much trouble"
Avatar
5,219 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: scrotumento CA, miss NC, and lived in th north east for a while, and even in the mid west for a bit.
     
Oct 19, 2008 17:40 |  #9

IMAGE: http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c239/daisydeadpeddles/a-1.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TimothyScott
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Oct 22, 2008 23:20 |  #10

in PS you could select the eyes one at a time and unsaturate them, seems natural most times.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sarahbn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
63 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Oct 26, 2008 19:44 as a reply to  @ TimothyScott's post |  #11

That looks better thank you. You used the clone tool?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M50D
Senior Member
Avatar
725 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: NW Montana
     
Oct 26, 2008 20:22 |  #12

Sharah, at first I thought the subject wasn't focused on, but after looking closer the foreground and background are even blurrier than the subject which leads me too the conclusion it is probably either camera shake or a bad film on your glass. I see the focal length was 400mm, are you using the 100-400L IS lens? I use that one a lot myself. I have gotten some pretty sharp photos with 1/30 or slower shutter speed, so that alone is not the problem. If you can steady the camera with a tripod or monopod that will help, and try to focus (no pun intended) on holding the camera really still, perhaps using one of the focus points in the viewfinder as a sight to hold steady on a certain point of the subject. Did you do any post processing, such as sharpening and contrast levels? Did you crop this image?

I know you were asking about eyes and maybe you think I am going on a tangent here, but a sharper image will help to preserve the fine detail on the eyes as well as the whole image. Also, lighting quality and angle is everything when it comes to eyes as unfavorable lighting will take the lifelike look out of eyes virtually before anything else.

In fact here is a post where there was discussion on the very subject: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=590968


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fubarhouse
Senior Member
Avatar
480 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Canberra, Australia
     
Oct 27, 2008 20:32 |  #13

Why does it always seem that in-camera flash produces red eye, but not external or mounted flashed? I'm sure there's a good reason.


Canon 40D, 580EXII, BG-E2N, RS-80N3 (Remote), Velbon Vel-flo 5 PH 248 (Tripod), Velbon RUP-43 (Monopod), Hoya CP Filters
Canon EF 50mm F/1.4 USM Canon EFS 17-85/4.0-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 28-300mm F/3.5-5.6 L IS USM, Canon EF 100-400mm F/4.5-5.6 L IS USM.
My Gear | My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Laramie
Still livin' the cowboylife
Avatar
3,220 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Inland Empire, California
     
Oct 29, 2008 13:56 |  #14

fubarhouse wrote in post #6573233 (external link)
Why does it always seem that in-camera flash produces red eye, but not external or mounted flashed? I'm sure there's a good reason.

Because the in-camera flash is closer to the lens, why mounted are usually higher flashing as a slightly greater downward angle? Just a thought...


5DIII | 40D | 17-40 f4L | Tamron 28-75 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 70-200 2.8L | Oly Zuiko 50 macro | Tamron 1.4x

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,517 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Eye problems
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
763 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.