Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 20 Oct 2008 (Monday) 14:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Stone Elephants at Temple

 
SamClarkPhotography
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Hendersonville, NC, USA
     
Oct 20, 2008 14:31 |  #1

Between the two photos, which do you prefer, and why? I'm having a hard time choosing which to 'keep'.

Thanks!


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Gripped XSi . Canon 18-135 IS (external link) . 055XPROB Manfrotto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Oct 20, 2008 15:17 |  #2

It's basically a dull pattern shot, either way.

I think it might do better with a context. In isolation it just doesn't do anything


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Oct 20, 2008 15:48 as a reply to  @ Robert_Lay's post |  #3

I think that both images lack adequate depth of field. If you must use shallow depth of field in a shot such as this, I would like it better if the foreground was focus rather than some arbitrary mid point because it leaves the impression that nothing is really in focus. I agree with Robert about the composition lacking interest.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Oct 20, 2008 16:29 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #4

Agreed as well with the fellows above...the concept was great, the composition was not fully met?


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The_Camera_Poser
Goldmember
3,012 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 21, 2008 04:37 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

I prefer number one, by a mile. Richer colours.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,135 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Oct 21, 2008 07:09 |  #6

Which of the two is more representative. THe first has a blue bias to it, the second adds some gold/yellow. I really think it is sixes on these - either one can work equally well. You might try a recrop adding emphasis to the one that is in focus... with the others leading out of frame. Much tighter perhaps will give this shot more focus. Right now, in this size, it is hard to visually grab the one that is in focus. Just something to chew on.

Where is this by the way?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mickdo100
Member
54 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Oct 21, 2008 08:16 |  #7

My preference is for the second one, would have been good if it was taken from a lower angle though, have no idea of that would have been possible of course!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SamClarkPhotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Hendersonville, NC, USA
     
Oct 21, 2008 09:04 as a reply to  @ mickdo100's post |  #8

Unfortunately this photo was taken at the lowest available vantage point. I have another 'perspective' of the same elephants that I'll attach below. The photos were taken at a Hindu Temple so I didn't spend much time as not to be disrespectful.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Gripped XSi . Canon 18-135 IS (external link) . 055XPROB Manfrotto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,135 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Oct 21, 2008 09:12 |  #9

I am liking that last posting a TON better. Now that works for me. You've captured the repetitive nature of the place but given me something to really look at.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Oct 21, 2008 09:12 |  #10

Sam's edit is beginning to show some interest - much improved!


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SamClarkPhotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Hendersonville, NC, USA
     
Oct 21, 2008 09:43 |  #11

Thanks guys

It is a better photo... guess I was initially attracted to the blue water and sky, but that didn't work well photographically.


Gripped XSi . Canon 18-135 IS (external link) . 055XPROB Manfrotto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mickdo100
Member
54 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Oct 21, 2008 13:42 |  #12

Yup love the new photo you have added, very nice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The_Camera_Poser
Goldmember
3,012 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 21, 2008 14:46 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

I like the last one way better too




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Oct 21, 2008 14:59 as a reply to  @ mickdo100's post |  #14

The last image is very good. Sometimes less is more. The first two shots probably tried to include too much while the last one removes a lot of clutter and narrows the subject down to a more well defined area of interest. I like the color of the last one also because it along with the long shadows emphasizes the time of day (either very early or very late) when the color of light will have more yellow. I am glad that you did not white balance the image to make the sunlight appear neutral.

Just as a side note, something that has dawned on me recently (excuse the pun), is that automatic white balance tries to make daylight neutral regardless of the time of day. Sometimes it is better to allow the image to reveal the time of day ... which is what you would get in film photography.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SamClarkPhotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Hendersonville, NC, USA
     
Oct 21, 2008 15:54 |  #15

I totally agree with you regarding white balance! I have 'flip flopped' back and forth between shooting Jpeg and RAW in the past, but have learned that RAW is the only way to go!


Gripped XSi . Canon 18-135 IS (external link) . 055XPROB Manfrotto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

855 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Stone Elephants at Temple
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2801 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.