Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 26 Oct 2008 (Sunday) 22:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I need help taking macro shots on my 40D + 24-105mm F4L IS

 
NeoTokyo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento Ca, Springfield Mo.
     
Oct 26, 2008 22:22 |  #1

Hey everyone.

I have been trying to shoot macro with my 24-105mm on my 40D but the pictures really dont come out how I would like. I shoot RAW so to leave room for editing but still it doesnt look right.

A lot are OOF or the body backfocuses which I really hate.
I do get keepers but not on the scale that I would like to have.
The keepers that I do have arent as nice as I have seen.

A friend of mine has a S5IS that shoots way better macro shots than mine does with a little $30 dollar clip on he bought from ebay. Of course our cameras are very very VERY different but he still gets better Macro shots than I do.

My non macro shots are perfect though :)

Thanks everyone!

-Eric-


Check out my flickr! http://www.flickr.com/​photos/crainracing/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thebishopp
Goldmember
1,903 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Indiana
     
Oct 26, 2008 23:09 |  #2

I read somewhere (not sure if it was true) but that P&S's made for really good macro shots due to the very small size of their sensors.

Probably in your case it has something to do wtih the lens you are using (especially if your "Non" macro shots are coming out ok).

You will also probably get more help if you post pics as you are sure to get asked that (someone may even put up one of those "this thread is worthless without pics" gifs).


"Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous." My Zen (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeoTokyo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento Ca, Springfield Mo.
     
Oct 27, 2008 01:10 |  #3

i will post some pics here in a few, just a bit busy atm because I just re-installed windows. :P

I went to a friends house Sat and shot black widows, grass hoppers, butterfiels, flies and flowers. I will post a few of those in a few.

I was thinking about the lens too, although it is a Macro lens as well perhaps its not best suited as that purpose, still Canon put the Yellow markings on it :)


Check out my flickr! http://www.flickr.com/​photos/crainracing/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thebishopp
Goldmember
1,903 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Indiana
     
Oct 27, 2008 01:18 |  #4

I may be wrong but at certain focal lengths camera shake is going to be much more noticeable. Were you pics taken handheld? and if so what was your shutter speed?


"Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous." My Zen (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LordV
Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006
Avatar
62,304 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 6879
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Worthing UK
     
Oct 27, 2008 01:18 |  #5

You will find most macro shooters manually focus simply because the camera does not know what you are trying to focus on especially with the narrower DOF of a DSLR. Try fixing the focus (probably at minimum) and focus by moving the camera. The lens is not a macro lens- just has slight closeup characteristics - suspect it's max mag is around 0.25:1 whereas macro lenses achieve 1:1 mag. A set of extension tubes eg Kenko will allow you to get closer.
Brian V.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lordv/ (external link)
http://www.lordv.smugm​ug.com/ (external link)
Macro Hints and tips
Canon 600D, 40D, 5D mk2, 7D, Tamron 90mm macro, Sigma 105mm OS, Canon MPE-65,18-55 kit lens X2, canon 200mm F2.8 L, Tamron 28-70mm xrdi, Other assorted bits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dalantech
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,379 posts
Gallery: 525 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 3548
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mt. Vernon, Mo. (living in Italy)
     
Oct 28, 2008 00:52 |  #6

A few things:

I have the 24-105 F4 L IS and at minimum focus it is horribly soft. Do you have any other lens that you can use? Even putting a closeup filter on the 24-105mm like the 500D won't improve the image quality at minimum. It's very unusual for a 105mm lens to have a 1/4 life size magnification, so Canon had to do some tricky engineering with the focusing group on that lens ...

A point and shoot camera can take great macro shots because they can produce a sharp image circle at minimum focus and they have small lenses -usually around 5 to 7mm at the wide end. The ultra wide angle gives them a lot of depth of field. But the small image sensor in a point and shoot is also very noisy...


My Gallery (external link)
My Blog (external link)
Macro Tutorials (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeoTokyo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento Ca, Springfield Mo.
     
Oct 28, 2008 04:25 |  #7

Well i solved one problem from my shoot on Saturday.... I had Flash Exposure Comp set to -2 which
messed up most of my pictures and I didnt figure it out untill later :P
idiot thing to do.

Next I was a little hurried as I didnt want to make my friends wait on me very
long.</p>
And lastly I have shakey hands :)

Of course the lens too isnt best known as a Macro lens though Canon prints it on it :D

Here are some examples I already have on my flickr.
My wifi isnt letting me upload right now.

This one I fired the flash. It is a 100% crop of a 2mp shrunk from the original 10mp.
I was very happy with this one though a 100% crop from the original file wasnt good
enough for me.

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3225/2940556885_99381577f5_o.jpg
This next photo is of the Marbled Orb weaver on her web, no wind and dusk.
I am not too happy with this one, any larger than 1024x682 and it starts to look
worse.
I had to PP this one a bit to try to make it better. No flash.
IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3198/2940556809_e46367e62b_o.jpg

This next one I was on the ground and was very steady. I am quite happy with this
photo except at 100% crop. I took three shots of this and one
backfocused.</p>There is a little beatle in the middle of the cap that I didnt see untill PP. He
looks</p> like a spec in that picture.
IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3286/2941396882_a3a983662c_b.jpg

Check the rest of my flickr for examples of the lens for non macro shots.
I think they come out quite well but I dont know enough people to give me
commentary on any of my pictures.

Check out my flickr! http://www.flickr.com/​photos/crainracing/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,941 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 2486
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
     
Oct 28, 2008 15:23 |  #8

great walkaround lens but not really suited to anything close to macro. Get a decent macro lens like the tamron 90.


Toby
Canon EOS R7, 100 L macro, MP-E65, RF 100-400
Olympus EM-1 MKII/MKIII, 60 macro, 90 macro, 12-40 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poorARTstudent85
Member
164 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Oct 29, 2008 18:20 as a reply to  @ racketman's post |  #9

yea i have the 24-105 as well, and it just doesnt cut it for me when it comes to macro. if you are going to get serious about macro i would suggest the cannon 100. it is crazy sharp, and has worked wonders for me. it also doubles as a great portrait lens. just my .02


5DmkII, Elan7ne, 430ex, 100 f2.8 macro, and 24-105L, and nifty fifty. 16-35 or 70-200 not sure yet...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeoTokyo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento Ca, Springfield Mo.
     
Oct 29, 2008 23:39 |  #10

Ya, I was thinking about the 100mm 2.8 and a set of tubes.

Thats gunna have to wait till after my 5D MKII gets here though... Probably not till Feb when I get my taxes back.

If you have a moving bug what mode do you guys put it on? Servo? Or do you just stun it :P


Check out my flickr! http://www.flickr.com/​photos/crainracing/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,941 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 2486
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
     
Oct 30, 2008 04:44 |  #11

as we tend to use manual focusing its more a question of chasing the moving bug and hoping for the best - try using AF on a bug in flight!
Basically pre set lens to magnification you want and then move whole rig in and out to achieve focus.


Toby
Canon EOS R7, 100 L macro, MP-E65, RF 100-400
Olympus EM-1 MKII/MKIII, 60 macro, 90 macro, 12-40 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeoTokyo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento Ca, Springfield Mo.
     
Oct 30, 2008 21:32 |  #12

Shoot I can hardly AF on a spider let alone a flying insect!!! :P


Check out my flickr! http://www.flickr.com/​photos/crainracing/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,796 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
I need help taking macro shots on my 40D + 24-105mm F4L IS
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1462 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.