Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 29 Oct 2008 (Wednesday) 00:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Brightness issue: not sure if it is LCD monitor or what!

 
delhi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun
     
Oct 29, 2008 00:23 |  #1

Hello,
I need some help here. I've taken some shots and edited them on my PC. They looked fine to my eyes. However they seem to show up quite dark using my office' workstation. Being unsure what's what, I went back and modified 2 images to gain some brightness. Now they look a bit bright on my own home PC but looked fine at work. :(
So I need your help to tell me which looks good. It will help me determine whether my home monitor is calibrated correctly or not.

pic 1:

IMAGE: http://alai.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p611926750-4.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://alai.zenfolio.c​om/img/v4/p611926750-4.jpg  (external link)

pic 2:
IMAGE: http://alai.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p483500834-4.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://alai.zenfolio.c​om/img/v4/p483500834-4.jpg  (external link)

Vancouver Portrait Photographer (external link)
No toys. Just tools. (external link) :lol:

5d3/1dx AF Guidebook | What AF Points to use for my 5d3/1dx?! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
delhi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun
     
Oct 29, 2008 00:24 |  #2

pic 3:

IMAGE: http://alai.zenfolio.com/img/v3/p883010407-4.jpg

pic 4:
IMAGE: http://alai.zenfolio.com/img/v4/p404875135-4.jpg


Thanks muchly!!!

Vancouver Portrait Photographer (external link)
No toys. Just tools. (external link) :lol:

5d3/1dx AF Guidebook | What AF Points to use for my 5d3/1dx?! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Oct 29, 2008 08:26 as a reply to  @ delhi's post |  #3

#1 and #2 have too much clutter in the background even though the autumn colors are very nice and the car has too much of its surface hidden by specular highlights or being too dark.

#3 - Even though it has a cluttered background, it sort of becomes ... uh ... background and the central theme of the image is enhanced by the curved lane which leads the viewer into the scene. The slightly visible sun coming through the foliage provides subtle justification for the reflections on the car's surface without either the sun or reflections being obtrusive.

#4 - this is what happens when #3 is taken a bit later as the sunlight gets too bright. The timing was perfect on #3 and this one appears to be just past the peak only because the reflections seem to be too bright and the background foliage seems to look a bit washed out in comparison to #3. I think that seeing #3 first has biased my opinion of this one.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PGAero
Member
103 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Oct 29, 2008 13:24 |  #4

Bill,
Pictures 1 and 2 are the same picture, as are 3 and 4. The time of day is not affecting the differences between the pictures. It's PP that has done it.

Anyway, to the question asked, to my eye, and on my uncalibrated monitor, I think that the 1 and 3 are too dark... detail in the car itself is lost. Perhaps turn down the brightness on your home PC?

Hope this helps.

~Peter




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Oct 29, 2008 13:58 as a reply to  @ PGAero's post |  #5

I don't think that I can turn the brightness down much lower on my Samsung XL20. When I calibrated and profiled it last night, I set the maximum luminance at 75 cd/m^2 which is a bit lower than most people use for a calibration point (typically 85 to 95 cd/m^2).

The difference in what you and I prefer probably has more to do with personal preferences than with monitor calibration.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Oct 29, 2008 15:37 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #6

#'s 1&3 have more "pop" but they are dark, maybe a little fill light.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hecster
Member
249 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Oct 29, 2008 16:26 |  #7

I know this is off-topic, as we're critiquing the shot and not your monitor calibration settings. but i agree with chauncey. the brightened up ones bring a little too much distraction from the background. one other thing i see is that the crop is too tight on the sides to take advantage of vignetting in pp.


40D | 50mm 1.8 | 24-105L |17-55 2.8 | 430EX | vivitar 285hv | CyberSync
my poor photo collection: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/hecster/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
delhi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun
     
Oct 29, 2008 17:50 as a reply to  @ chauncey's post |  #8

Thanks for the feedback. So it seems that the general consensus is lightening up the image results in less pleasing image which means my office monitor is indeed calibrated on the dark side.


Vancouver Portrait Photographer (external link)
No toys. Just tools. (external link) :lol:

5d3/1dx AF Guidebook | What AF Points to use for my 5d3/1dx?! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jimconnerphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,177 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Southern California
     
Oct 29, 2008 18:00 |  #9

subjective...
How are you calibrating your monitors?
Are you using the same software in viewing the images?
If you have 2 calibrated monitors displaying the images in a different way you might not want to modify the images.


Wedding and Portraits www.jimconnerphoto.com (external link)
Commercial Work www.jamesdconner.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
epatt250
Senior Member
769 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Central, Arkansas
     
Oct 30, 2008 16:48 |  #10

Regardless of how having the pictures darker may effect the feel of the image and make them more or less likable.

The brighter of each look much better from a proper exposure standpoint than the darker.


Gear- Why do you care? If my image is good it's good, if it sucks it sucks. It's most likely my own fault.
www.elipattersonphoto.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,768 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Brightness issue: not sure if it is LCD monitor or what!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2882 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.