Oct 30, 2008 11:41 | #1 I can't decide which one looks the best, so here are two versions of the same sunset:  2. Brighter  #2 is closer to the reality, but I also like the dramatic look of the first processing. Taken with a Canon 400D & nifty fifty combo. Av mode: F4, ISO 200, exposure compensation - 1EV. Shot in Raw. Let me know what you think.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hawkeye60 Goldmember  2,079 posts Likes: 11 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Mesa, Arizona More info | Oct 30, 2008 11:53 | #2 #2 to me. It's a lens not a lense!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robonrome Goldmember  2,746 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2008 Location: Australia More info | Oct 30, 2008 15:14 | #3 As is I'd go the second, but reckon the first would be a better pic by cropping away the top quarter or so...less noise than the second which has been brought out by ligtening - very nice rob - check my galleries at http://hardlightimages.zenfolio.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sparker1 Cream of the Crop  29,368 posts Likes: 295 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Sierra Vista, AZ More info | Oct 30, 2008 15:55 | #4 #2. Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/sparker1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Karlo Senior Member  470 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Croatia , Rijeka More info | Oct 30, 2008 16:01 | #5 Number two but please get rid of the lights in the bottom of the frame ... They spoil the overall silhouette part . WTB 1Ds MK III or 5D MK II PM ME!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RadAL Cream of the Crop  9,633 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Spanish Fort, AL More info | Oct 30, 2008 18:49 | #6 in between would look best. Equipment: Canon PowerShot A650IS (semi retired) and Canon Powershot G10 (primary) and Rebel XT 350D w/18-55mm kit lens and Quanterey 18-200mm-- www.youtube.com/alexander1485
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hurley1718 Senior Member  288 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: Olympia WA More info | Oct 30, 2008 18:52 | #7 #2. and second the motion to remove the lights at the bottom of the image. "I'm not immature, my default age limit is set to low."- someone in my head told me to write that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cdeming "īt" didn't fall off  1,968 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Chicago-ish More info | Oct 30, 2008 19:53 | #8 I think I would like to see a crop somewhere between 1 and 2 as well. I like 2, but I also like the contrast of the black sky at the top in 1. Maybe cropping just where the color ends?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goldboughtrue Goldmember 1,857 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Colorado More info | Oct 30, 2008 20:26 | #9  Permanent ban#2 and the first thing I thought was to get rid of the lights http://www.pbase.com/goldbough
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for your comments. I'll make sure I remove disturbing lights next time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 31, 2008 23:27 | #11 I want a big poser of the first one, I personally like the black top 1/3rd of the frame. Makes for more sinister image! awesome 80d l 10-22 I 15-85 I 28 1.8 I 50 1.8 I 55-250 I Kenko Tubes I 580 ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1119 guests, 169 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
Chrissy
