Nice and serene:
 | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
Oct 30, 2008 15:42 | #1 Nice and serene:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BPL Member  221 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Oxford, CT More info | Oct 30, 2008 16:33 | #2 In Maine I'm guessing? Excellent shot! Canon 7D gripped, Canon 30D gripped, Canon 300D gripped, Canon SX120IS, Tokina 12-24, Canon 24-70 f2.8L, Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS, Canon 580EXII, 3X 430EX. Cybersyncs, And the learning process continues...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irishman Goldmember  4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Oct 30, 2008 17:26 | #3 Beautiful shot. If you were to crop about 95% of the sky the shot loses nothing. 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chadmcm Senior Member 337 posts Likes: 72 Joined May 2008 Location: Vancouver, Washington More info | Oct 30, 2008 17:36 | #4 I second irishman's response. The sky's not interesting enough to add much, but a panoramic crop might enhance the interplay between sky, mountain, and lake. Chad McMurry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RadAL Cream of the Crop  9,633 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Spanish Fort, AL More info | Oct 30, 2008 18:45 | #5 too much sky IMO (without a sunset) Equipment: Canon PowerShot A650IS (semi retired) and Canon Powershot G10 (primary) and Rebel XT 350D w/18-55mm kit lens and Quanterey 18-200mm-- www.youtube.com/alexander1485
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hurley1718 Senior Member  288 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: Olympia WA More info | Oct 30, 2008 18:54 | #6 The grouping of trees on the right hand side are very cool. They draw my eyes right to them. I agree on removing more of the sky. "I'm not immature, my default age limit is set to low."- someone in my head told me to write that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cdeming "īt" didn't fall off  1,968 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Chicago-ish More info | Oct 30, 2008 19:49 | #7 |
Oct 30, 2008 21:19 | #8 camo4x4atv wrote in post #6593361  In Maine I'm guessing? Excellent shot! Absolutely, beautiful, serene place. irishman wrote in post #6593675 Beautiful shot. If you were to crop about 95% of the sky the shot loses nothing. chadmcm wrote in post #6593739 I second irishman's response. The sky's not interesting enough to add much, but a panoramic crop might enhance the interplay between sky, mountain, and lake. RadAL wrote in post #6594112 too much sky IMO (without a sunset) hurley1718 wrote in post #6594180 The grouping of trees on the right hand side are very cool. They draw my eyes right to them. I agree on removing more of the sky. Cdeming wrote in post #6594513 I too agree with cropping the sky. The water is lovely! ok, your points are taken on board:
I also had a different shot too:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JIJ123 Member  68 posts Joined Oct 2008 More info | the crop looks better
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Oct 31, 2008 03:42 | #10 I def. like the crop much better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 31, 2008 08:16 | #11 Good, thanks for the comments, I never really thought much about cropping the thing down.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1608 guests, 141 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
Chrissy
)