Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 01 Nov 2008 (Saturday) 15:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help in Deciding= 400 f2.8 or 500 f4?

 
mikeassk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley
     
Nov 01, 2008 15:32 |  #1

I just sold off the 300mm 2.8 IS ( phenomenal lens) because it was just too short. I enjoy surf photography and i really was not super pleased with the results at 600mm (with 2X TC).

I am awaiting some funds to purchase either a used 400mm 2.8 IS or a 500mm f4 IS.

My main question is: Does anyone ever use the 500mm for field sports? How does it perform with adequate light. I know it might be rough for night games with the lost stop.

Thanks,
mike


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
col4bin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,264 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 01, 2008 16:59 |  #2

i would think for surfing you want as much reach as possible. i would go for the 500. i see plenty of 500's at football games.


Frank
http://www.fiorentinop​hotography.com (external link)
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canonswhitelensesrule
Goldmember
Avatar
3,648 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, B.C.
     
Nov 01, 2008 17:45 |  #3

I've used a 600mm f4 lens for night football games outdoors, using ISO 1600 with a shutter speed of 1/500th @f4, so the 500mm f4L shouldn't be any problem.

While the 400mm f2.8L I.S. would be great with the extra stop of light, and adding the 1.4x TC would give you a focal length of 560mm f4, there's the extra weight of the 400 mm lens to consider.

I think whichever lens you choose, you'll capture some incredible images.

One final thing to consider. Most professional surf photographers when shooting from the beach, tend to use the EF 600mm f4L (or possibly now the EF 800mm f5.6L) lens. So if surfing photography is as you say, your top priority, of the two lenses you've mentioned, I'd say go for the 500mm f4L.

Or since the extra weight of the 400mm f2.8L doesn't seem to be an issue for you, then why not go for the gusto, and find a good deal on a 600mm f4L I.S.


Photographers do it in 1/1,000th of a second...but the memory lasts forever! ;)
"It's only cheating if you get caught!" - Al Bundy
People who THINK they know it all really annoy those of us who DO!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cadams
Senior Member
Avatar
984 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Brookfield, WI
     
Nov 01, 2008 18:11 as a reply to  @ Canonswhitelensesrule's post |  #4

I love my 500 and have shot it at many sporting events. I think the big downside to the 400 is the extra weight and the extra money. The 500 is an all around awesome lens.


http://www.ccaphotos.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Nov 01, 2008 18:28 |  #5

No real comparison 'tween the 400/2.8 and 500/4. Big difference in size, weight and cost. I cannot imagine your needing f/2.8 for surfing really. Get the 500/4.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeassk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley
     
Nov 01, 2008 23:01 |  #6

Ya ,
i have seen a lot of surf photographers with the 600,
but really want to have a versatile lens for field sports(rugby) and being able to shoot surfing. the 600 seems too long for field action.

The 300 was great for field sports, just too short for surfing. The 400mm would be nice at 560 with 1.4.

The 500mm seems like a good middle ground. After Xmas ill have all the money to decide.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fWord
Goldmember
Avatar
2,637 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 02, 2008 01:02 as a reply to  @ mikeassk's post |  #7

I am looking forward to the day when I can afford to debate between these two lenses. But when that time comes, I'd be taking a 500/4L, no questions asked.


LightWorks Portfolio (external link)
Night Photography Tutorial: Basics & Minutiae (external link)
Gear List (Past & Present)
The Art of Composition IS the Art of Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ironbelle
Senior Member
691 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Nov 02, 2008 01:08 |  #8

Hookedup(I know I spelled it wrong) uses his 500mm f4 for surf and got off some sweet shots of the Goo Goo Dolls frontman playing at a presidential ralley. The riser was pretty far from the stage and everyone else had 70-200mm and he happen to have his 500 f4 with him so he ended up with the better shots. That 500mm is on my lens list. Never thought it would be, but I could use a good lens like that.


My Blog (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Nov 02, 2008 02:30 |  #9

ironbelle wrote in post #6607008 (external link)
but I could use one good zoom like that.

OK...I'm nit pickin' here but the 500 f4 is a prime not a zoom ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ironbelle
Senior Member
691 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
     
Nov 02, 2008 02:32 |  #10

jra wrote in post #6607181 (external link)
OK...I'm nit pickin' here but the 500 f4 is a prime not a zoom ;)

It's a "fixed zoom" how's that?:)


My Blog (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nickbeechey
Member
Avatar
132 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: MK UK
     
Nov 02, 2008 04:14 as a reply to  @ ironbelle's post |  #11

If you need the reach all the time I would go for the 500, however if the extra weight is not a problem, then the 400 with a 1.4 would give you two great options


1Ds MK3, 1D mk2N, 7D, EOS1NRS
Canon24-70 F/2.8L[COLOR=red] [COLOR=black],TS-E 24 F/3.5L ,MP-E 65 F/2.8, 85 F/1.2L II ,100 F/2.8L macro, 70-200 F/2.8L II, 200 F/1.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dawnrogers
Goldmember
Avatar
1,190 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: England
     
Nov 02, 2008 07:01 |  #12

I'm also thinking about buying the 500 f4 for wildlife photography, how do you find carrying around weight wise?


Dawn
http://www.pivotalphot​ography.co.uk (external link)
My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cadams
Senior Member
Avatar
984 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Brookfield, WI
     
Nov 02, 2008 10:06 as a reply to  @ dawnrogers's post |  #13

It's really not that bad. I carried it around and shot handheld for a few hours yesterday. I would guess 30 min of that was holding the lens up to shoot birds. I just wedge my elbow into my side and use it as a kind of monopod. I'm no muscle builder either so I would think most people should have no problem, it's just a matter of getting used to it.


http://www.ccaphotos.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dawnrogers
Goldmember
Avatar
1,190 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: England
     
Nov 02, 2008 10:21 |  #14

Sounds like I'd be ok with it, Just being a girly I owndetred if it was going to be too heavy but I'm sued to carryingheavy photographic kit around...


Dawn
http://www.pivotalphot​ography.co.uk (external link)
My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Nov 02, 2008 10:38 |  #15

Many people considerthe 500/4 to be the best compromise of magnification, speed and weight (and cost). The 400/2.8 and 600/4 are much heavier and are manageable if you're not too weedy, but you'd soon tire of the weight. They're both a good bit more expensive than the 500 too.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,502 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Help in Deciding= 400 f2.8 or 500 f4?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1052 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.