Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 25 Feb 2005 (Friday) 05:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Please critique these 4 shots (56k Warn)

 
Flagpole
Member
112 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 25, 2005 05:55 |  #1

G'day!

I haven't been shooting as much as I hoped I would be in New Year so I decided to go shooting today. I was hoping for nice coloured sunset to practice but it was overcast which wasn't too bad as at least I got some nice sky photos for my sky library. I took about 65 shots and some of them I like. That will keep me going for a few weeks experimenting with various post-processing and retouching techniques. What do you guys think about these four?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

A candid of a couple getting their wedding shots done. The groom is out of the shot

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Sydney Harbour Bridge. I was trying to get a nice siluette against the cloudy sky


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Sydney Opera House from Milson's Point


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Sydney Luna Park. I took a lot of shots of the Luna Park Face but for the most of the time there was a car parked right outside of it :(


Thank you for any comments. I would dearly love feedback on composition, exposure and post processing.

Regards,
Flagpole
Sydney, Australia

G2, 420EX, Tiffen 0.75x & 2.0x, Lumiquest Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ayotnoms
Perfect Anti-Cloning Argument
Avatar
2,988 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
     
Feb 25, 2005 13:09 |  #2

thumbs up on image #3 and #4. Did you try #4 as a B&W?
I like the framing on #3.
#1 lacks a certain snap and #2 lacks the shadow detail to give the bridge some depth although it might the way my monitor shows the picture or the way the web changes the image...or both :-\

Nice effort


Steve
[URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=1267612&postcou​nt=17"]Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flagpole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
112 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 25, 2005 23:40 as a reply to  @ ayotnoms's post |  #3

G'day Ayotnoms!

Thanks for the critique. I appreciate you taking time to post your opinion. I will look into B&W for #4 again. I tried to see what it may look like in b&w really quickly but found that I ended up with very flat image using Greyscale as a quick preview. I may try another conversion using a Channel Mixer to see if I can get the contrast and tone I like.
#1 strangely enough has more pop in colour than b&w. :eek: I may post color version when I get home from work to see if its better. With #2 I can try to open the shadow details. They are all there since I shot these in RAW and playing with some exposure or Shadow&Highlight should reveal most of the shadow area.

Regards,
Flagpole


G2, 420EX, Tiffen 0.75x & 2.0x, Lumiquest Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ayotnoms
Perfect Anti-Cloning Argument
Avatar
2,988 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
     
Feb 26, 2005 00:29 |  #4

I should have kept my yap shut. Now that I'm on a my Powerbook, all these photos look 100% better than they did on my crappy work monitor; more detail, crisper resolution, appealing tonal range.

#1 still doesn't put lead in my pencil, if you'll pardon the expression. Perhaps the color version would indeed provide that elusive "pop".

Either way, the images are much better than my initial comments may have conveyed.

Cheers


Steve
[URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=1267612&postcou​nt=17"]Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Feb 26, 2005 04:26 |  #5

#1 looks like it's taken on a overcast day: Lacks a bit of 'punch'
#2: Great!!
#3: Don't like the way the fence interferes with the opera house and the rest of the background.
This way it isn't clear what you intended as subject: Fence or building?
#4: Just not interesting to me.
So I go for #2...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flagpole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
112 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 26, 2005 05:02 |  #6

G'day again!

Well here is #1 in color:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Not sure about the POP :)

Rene, agreed on the fence. I would have loved the fence to sit lower or not be there at all :) I suppose I can clone it out but it may be more hassle than its worth. I did take another shot closer forward with fence out of the way but most of the archway was also out of the shot. May have to try this one again one day :)

Just a quick question is noise in #2 too much? I added 10% noise then faded it 40% and set the mode to Pin Light I think. But not sure if it looks too grainy? :D

Flagpole

G2, 420EX, Tiffen 0.75x & 2.0x, Lumiquest Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,792 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Please critique these 4 shots (56k Warn)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1733 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.