Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 05 Nov 2008 (Wednesday) 22:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

White Balance Lens Cap

 
AzMandella
Member
Avatar
133 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Tucson Az
     
Nov 05, 2008 22:03 |  #1

Who uses one and how do you like it and what brand?


Canon 5D Mk III , 1Ds MkII , 20D , 16-35 f2.8L , 24-70 f2.8L , 70-200 f4L IS , 28-135 IS , 85 1.8 , 2-600 EX II , 2-580EXII , 1-580 EX.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headshotzx
Goldmember
Avatar
4,488 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Singapore
     
Nov 06, 2008 01:29 |  #2

Mennon WB cap for cheap, and it does the job pretty well.

However, sometimes it can be a very little bit warm.


Zexun | Flickr (external link) | YouTube (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Nov 06, 2008 08:14 |  #3

When you say white balance lens cap youre referring to something like an ExpoDisc right? Just for attempting to properly set white balance? If thats all youre looking to do I'd suggest depending on your subject using a grey card instead. If your shooting something where a grey card simply cant be used like landscapes or something, just shoot raw and fix it later in post processing.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SnapLocally.com
Goldmember
Avatar
1,744 posts
Likes: 22
Joined May 2007
     
Nov 06, 2008 08:21 |  #4

Caps = Overpriced gimmicks

Try using a coffee filter. Put your lens on manual focus, aperture priority, cover your lens with the filter, aim it at the light source, and there it is- your source image for CWB.


www.SnapLocally.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AzMandella
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
133 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Tucson Az
     
Nov 06, 2008 17:51 |  #5

ben_r_ wrote in post #6634176 (external link)
When you say white balance lens cap youre referring to something like an ExpoDisc right? Just for attempting to properly set white balance? If thats all youre looking to do I'd suggest depending on your subject using a grey card instead. If your shooting something where a grey card simply cant be used like landscapes or something, just shoot raw and fix it later in post processing.

I always shoot raw. But I have found that using a white sheet of paper works good also. I did a test where I shot using the same aperature and SS using the same studio lighting. I used a grey card,white sheet of paper, and auto white ballance. When editing I would just correct with the auto adjust white balance to see how much change in the histogram occured and the white sheet of paper was the best. The histogram only moved minimally as where the grey card was next and the auto white balance was the worst. I try to expose the best I can to reduce post procesing. I feel that the best pics are the ones that were exposed properly rather than manipulated. That's why I was wondering if anyone had used an ExpoDisc or similar to set white balance.


Canon 5D Mk III , 1Ds MkII , 20D , 16-35 f2.8L , 24-70 f2.8L , 70-200 f4L IS , 28-135 IS , 85 1.8 , 2-600 EX II , 2-580EXII , 1-580 EX.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cutaway
Member
50 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2006
     
Nov 06, 2008 18:56 |  #6

I use a WhiBal. (http://www.rawworkflow​.com/whibal/ (external link)). I think the main thing for me is that it is supposed to be spectrally balanced and remains consistent. It's also sturdy and easily stowed away.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tgara
Goldmember
Avatar
2,336 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
     
Nov 06, 2008 20:51 as a reply to  @ cutaway's post |  #7

I use an Expo Disc, particularly when shooting indoors with tungsten lights or in a mixed lighting situation. It works great -- somebody should get a Nobel Prize for inventing this thing. The Expodisc is helpful because it integrates light sources from all angles, just like an incident light meter. Slight variations of angle won't affect the color balance as it will with a card.


EOS 5D Mark III
EOS Rebel SL1
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Okami
Member
81 posts
Joined May 2008
     
Nov 07, 2008 18:55 |  #8

going to check out the whibal, expos seem pretty expensive




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headcase650
Goldmember
Avatar
1,632 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Nov 08, 2008 10:33 |  #9

Any neutral translucent plastic over the lens will do the same thing. When the expodisc was first introduced the popular alternative was a lid from a pringles tube. They have sense went with a clear plastic but I think you get the idea. I think Crisco shortning lids could probably be used.


60D, Canon 18-135 IS, Sigma 10-20 hsm, 24-70 2.8 hsm, 70-200 2.8 hsm, 430EX II, and all the other stuff that goes along with it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
seanv
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
     
Nov 08, 2008 11:22 |  #10

I have a WhiBal card, and maybe I'm missing something, but I wouldn't bother to replace it if it vaporized. I shoot mostly in a controlled studio setting, and when I sample different areas of the card (same shot,) I get a range of different readings. Not exactly what I was hoping for from a 40 dollar piece of plastic.


Sean
ean@musicalpeace.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagikTrik
Member
Avatar
100 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Carrick to be exact)
     
Nov 12, 2008 16:24 |  #11

seanv wrote in post #6647885 (external link)
I have a WhiBal card, and maybe I'm missing something, but I wouldn't bother to replace it if it vaporized. I shoot mostly in a controlled studio setting, and when I sample different areas of the card (same shot,) I get a range of different readings. Not exactly what I was hoping for from a 40 dollar piece of plastic.

Are you sure you placing it correctly, like so the light hits it evenly? I mean I'm certainly not implying your not smart enough, but I've owned a total of 5 WhiBal cards & have never had a problem with anything, especially difference from spot-to-spot on a single card & from what I hear they do have fairly strict quality control in factory, trashing batches that are a certain percentage of difference from card to card. Is it a name brand WhiBal card? Do you maybe carry it in your pocket or out of it's little case in your bag (I know the color goes all the way through but if there is a deep enough gouge it could make a shadow I suppose)?
Of course I believe you, I don't mean to sound like that, I'd just like to figure out why your having that problem, know what I mean?


My Gear List
Zenfolio (external link)
Flickr (external link)
DeviantArt (external link)
When critiquing my images please be as harsh as you feel is necessary.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkas
Senior Member
511 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: Southern California
     
Nov 12, 2008 23:23 |  #12

MagikTrik wrote in post #6674596 (external link)
Are you sure you placing it correctly, like so the light hits it evenly? I mean I'm certainly not implying your not smart enough, but I've owned a total of 5 WhiBal cards & have never had a problem with anything, especially difference from spot-to-spot on a single card & from what I hear they do have fairly strict quality control in factory, trashing batches that are a certain percentage of difference from card to card.

I agree. As long as the angle is correct, I've never had a problem with mine.


Gerry Kaslowski
gkas@socal.rr.com (external link)
Gerry's Pics http://MikeKazPhotogra​phy.com/Gerry/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2005GLI
Goldmember
Avatar
1,863 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 311
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Jersey
     
Nov 13, 2008 19:40 |  #13

i use the expodisc on occaision and its pretty good. It helps me the best in overcast days.


|Canon 80D|40D backup|24-105 F4/L|Sigma 70-200 F/2.8|Sigma 150-500 C|
|Tokina 12-24|Sigma 8mm Fisheye|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Travelller
Member
Avatar
138 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2010
     
May 27, 2010 08:06 |  #14

Yes, old thread, I know, but that's what the Search Engine spit out first, sooo...

I recently saw a shot of a Photojojo White Balance Lens cap (external link) from a member and I have to say I like the idea. However, at $65 plus [Int'l] shipping, I'd like to hear a first-hand account from member(s) who use it, please... .

I also saw the filter types but I'd just assume not have to screw on anything as I want to be able to change my filters unhindered. I'm also not a big fan of the Pringles-lid solutions... (who's to say they are truly neutral?)


Traveller
my photo gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ K
Goldmember
Avatar
1,637 posts
Joined Apr 2001
Location: San Francisco area
     
May 27, 2010 10:10 |  #15

Here is a survey/review of available on lens white balance products.

http://www.ppmag.com …arison-white-balan-1.html (external link)

Cupcake liners work pretty well, and they are the right price!
Mike K


Canon 6D, 1DmkII, IR modified 5DII with lots of Canon L, TSE and Zeiss ZE lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

15,109 views & 0 likes for this thread, 26 members have posted to it.
White Balance Lens Cap
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2753 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.