In addition to acchildress' comments about symmetry in the second shot (which I completely agree with), the white balance looks a bit off to me here...at least compared with the first shot. If you shot these in RAW, I'd go back and play with the white balance settings a bit...or considering this looked like a public library, I'd just go back and re-shoot it with the suggestions you get here...it's a very neat idea.
As far as the first shot goes, I have to disagree with spooch in that I don't think it's "underexposed" as much as simply poor lighting. If you bumped up the exposure any more, you'd end up with blown out highlights on the top of the toilet, the planters and the window. I will however agree with spooch in regards to the subject matter. Granted, whenever I get a new camera I tend to play with shots around the house myself to get a feeling for the new piece of equipment (which is what I'm sure you were doing here)...shots of the kitchen, the living room, my dogs, etc., but I'm not sure "the head" would ever really be my first choice. That said, the white balance is beautiful here and the image looks pretty crisp and sharp. Could probably use a little USM if the subject matter were more...umm...interesting, but over-all you do have the right idea as far as working the new camera goes. I would add that there does also seem to be some lens distortion in this shot as well...kit lens? The wall line to the left of the toilet (image right) appears to be straight, but the window looks pretty slanted...a common problem with inexpensive lenses, especially in tight quarters such as this. I'll forgo any further critique on this shot as obviously it "is what it is"...getting a feel for the camera
.
Peace,
Jim
"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
Walczak Photography - www.walczakphoto.izfree.com
Gear List