Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 06 Nov 2008 (Thursday) 02:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 40D VERY FIRST DIGITAL IMAGES, CRIT!

 
jguadian
Member
45 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
     
Nov 06, 2008 02:28 |  #1

Hello all,

These are my first digital pictures from my 40D. Although I have taken film photography classes, I never really got a hand on a digital camera. These are my first. I just bought my 40D and took it for a fun ride.

From the get-go I will let you know that I was having fun rather than trying to get the PERFECT image. But anyways, CRIT and destroy the images.

I posted 8 pictures but then realized that we are only allowed to post 2 at a time and only reply with additional pictures if requested.

THANKS!;)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


40D | Canon 28-135 + 10-22 mm | Manfrotto 190XDB Tripod + 390RC2 :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spooch
Member
Avatar
84 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
     
Nov 06, 2008 02:39 |  #2

no images to crit sry :-|


Photo gallery (external link)

Don't ask what your camera can do for you,
Ask what you can do for your camera!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spooch
Member
Avatar
84 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
     
Nov 06, 2008 03:23 as a reply to  @ spooch's post |  #3

#1. Toooooo dark, and underexposed, and it's a toilet :rolleyes:
#2. Well nice try on the ghostwalk, but this one is a bit overexposed. the shoot is clumsy, and the ghost is a bit too visible. but nice try. Keep practicing, and learning on this forum and internet, about exposure, f-stops, DOF, rules of the third etc...
But keep practicing and using your camera.


Photo gallery (external link)

Don't ask what your camera can do for you,
Ask what you can do for your camera!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
acchildress
Senior Member
986 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Nov 06, 2008 07:39 |  #4

Well I like #2 alot. I don't think it's overexposed. It looks just right on my calibrated monitor. I like the ghost image. You did a good job catching it.

My only complaint is that I would have rather seen this shot very symetrically framed, with the camera dead center of the isle. While this is usually an bad thing this is one of those shots where it would have been great.

Keep it up!



Come be a big fish in a little pond, help build
theanswerjar.com  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walczak ­ Photo
Goldmember
1,034 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Nov 06, 2008 08:19 |  #5

In addition to acchildress' comments about symmetry in the second shot (which I completely agree with), the white balance looks a bit off to me here...at least compared with the first shot. If you shot these in RAW, I'd go back and play with the white balance settings a bit...or considering this looked like a public library, I'd just go back and re-shoot it with the suggestions you get here...it's a very neat idea.

As far as the first shot goes, I have to disagree with spooch in that I don't think it's "underexposed" as much as simply poor lighting. If you bumped up the exposure any more, you'd end up with blown out highlights on the top of the toilet, the planters and the window. I will however agree with spooch in regards to the subject matter. Granted, whenever I get a new camera I tend to play with shots around the house myself to get a feeling for the new piece of equipment (which is what I'm sure you were doing here)...shots of the kitchen, the living room, my dogs, etc., but I'm not sure "the head" would ever really be my first choice. That said, the white balance is beautiful here and the image looks pretty crisp and sharp. Could probably use a little USM if the subject matter were more...umm...interesti​ng, but over-all you do have the right idea as far as working the new camera goes. I would add that there does also seem to be some lens distortion in this shot as well...kit lens? The wall line to the left of the toilet (image right) appears to be straight, but the window looks pretty slanted...a common problem with inexpensive lenses, especially in tight quarters such as this. I'll forgo any further critique on this shot as obviously it "is what it is"...getting a feel for the camera :D.

Peace,
Jim


"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
Walczak Photography - www.walczakphoto.izfre​e.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jguadian
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
45 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
     
Nov 06, 2008 11:42 as a reply to  @ Walczak Photo's post |  #6

Jim et. all,

Thanks for your feedback. The subject on the second photo was not shot to highlight the "greatness" of the toilet, rather I was interested in the vector created from the light.

The toilet photo was taken with a 10-22 mm a not so inexpensive lens. :D

I will go re-shot the library.

Thanks,


40D | Canon 28-135 + 10-22 mm | Manfrotto 190XDB Tripod + 390RC2 :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Nov 06, 2008 15:10 |  #7

jguadian wrote in post #6635542 (external link)
The toilet photo was taken with a 10-22 mm a not so inexpensive lens. :D

No matter how much your lens costs, this is always going to be just a toilet :)

Your library shot has a lot of potential.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Nov 06, 2008 17:42 |  #8

LeuceDeuce wrote in post #6636843 (external link)
No matter how much your lens costs, this is always going to be just a toilet :)

I'm sorry - but I think a toilet is a fine subject to photograph. I took this to show how I prep a public restroom... but the dissention in this thread against toilets inspires me to embark on a new photographic agenda to capture these porcelain sculptures.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Nov 06, 2008 18:13 |  #9

Reign wrote in post #6637726 (external link)
I'm sorry - but I think a toilet is a fine subject to photograph. I took this to show how I prep a public restroom... but the dissention in this thread against toilets inspires me to embark on a new photographic agenda to capture these porcelain sculptures.

LOL we've hit a new low in this forum :)


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Nov 06, 2008 18:38 |  #10

LeuceDeuce wrote in post #6637877 (external link)
LOL we've hit a new low in this forum :)

We have......:confused:


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Nov 06, 2008 19:49 |  #11

Art is often misunderstood


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walczak ­ Photo
Goldmember
1,034 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Nov 08, 2008 10:34 |  #12

Ya know this is actually kind of a funny discussion to me about the toilets. A number of years ago when I started getting serious about photography (well, digital photography at least), I had been on this quest to find something "different" as a venue for my artistic expression. My main love in regards to photography has always been (and probably will always be) nature and critters, but at the time I was trying to think from a commercial stand point and let's face it, the market is soooooo saturated with such images that a person often needs something different...something outside of the box so to speak for his/her work to really stand out. As such, I started shooting "out houses" around Ohio! LOL!!! For several weeks I was going around to various parks and such trying to shoot as many different out houses and "port-a-johns" as I could find. I think my idea at the time was something along the lines of the juxtaposition between the out houses and the lovely views of nature around them in the park. My wife of course thought I had completely lost my mind! Of course when I sat down to start editing them and tried to view them from any "artistic perspective"...well...​I started to think she was right.

I do still have those images backed up to CD-ROM somewhere, but I could just never bring myself to print any of them. I suppose there are a few people out there who might have found some artistic value in them...there are of course people who can consider any kind of trash as "art" but I didn't want to build my reputation on that. More over from my own stand point I just decided that if I couldn't enjoy them, they simply were not worth doing so I've just stuck with what I love and know best...critters.

Anyways, this convo has really brought back some very strange memories! LOL!!!

Peace,
Jim


"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
Walczak Photography - www.walczakphoto.izfre​e.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Nov 08, 2008 10:59 |  #13

Jim,

Thank you for that story. That was actually very endearing. I love it! I would love for an opportunity to set a pristine white toilet on a beach or in the middle of a forest.

Ha!


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JKSlusser
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Colleyville, TX
     
Nov 08, 2008 19:45 as a reply to  @ Nathan's post |  #14

"I'm sorry - but I think a toilet is a fine subject to photograph. I took this to show how I prep a public restroom... but the dissention in this thread against toilets inspires me to embark on a new photographic agenda to capture these porcelain sculptures."

Well ... you would save TP if you would just tear off a long piece and put it in the shape of a "V" - it's faster and easier - my neighbor taught me that when our kids were little!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Nov 14, 2008 20:55 |  #15

No, I don't like that technique... I want full coverage and the V doesn't give me that


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,796 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Canon 40D VERY FIRST DIGITAL IMAGES, CRIT!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1654 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.