Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 07 Nov 2008 (Friday) 21:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Machu Picchu & graduated neutral density filters

 
dougsturgess
Senior Member
470 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Atlanta | USA
     
Nov 07, 2008 21:09 |  #1

Some have recommended using a graduated ND filter when photographing Machu Picchu. I'm shooting with a 20D & have a circular polarizer. I probably won't take my tripod as it's just too much to manage on this trip in addition to the other equipment.

My question is, is a graduated neutral density filter really necessary or is shooting with a circular polarizer good enough to get good shots? I'm going to experiment with taking hand held HDR shots before I go to see if that's a possibility with a really steady hand.

I'd appreciate any helpful advice, especially anyone that's shot a lot of landscapes or even Machu Picchu.

Thanks.


Doug Sturgess
www.sturgessart.com (external link)
doug-sturgess.artistwebsite​s.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jrader
Goldmember
Avatar
1,011 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, Hawai'i
     
Nov 08, 2008 04:22 |  #2

dougsturgess wrote in post #6645241 (external link)
Some have recommended using a graduated ND filter when photographing Machu Picchu. I'm shooting with a 20D & have a circular polarizer. I probably won't take my tripod as it's just too much to manage on this trip in addition to the other equipment.

My question is, is a graduated neutral density filter really necessary or is shooting with a circular polarizer good enough to get good shots? I'm going to experiment with taking hand held HDR shots before I go to see if that's a possibility with a really steady hand.

I'd appreciate any helpful advice, especially anyone that's shot a lot of landscapes or even Machu Picchu.

Thanks.

Never been to Machu Picchu, but I feel the urge to add my 2 cents. GNDs are, by far, the best tool to have for outdoor photography, with circular polarizer running a close second. The real beauty of it is that you can still do HDR as well with the GND on the camera. With HDR you get details in the shadows and the highlights (as well as a proper exposure) and the software blends to get a higher dynamic range not possible in a single shot. GNDs are used to balance the light between two areas (usually aligned along the horizon of the sky with subject). GNDs can not be used to get the shadow/highlight details that HDR does. But as I said, you can still do HDR with GNDs on. And since you are not taking the tripod, you will be happy to know that there are HDR programs out there that do alignment (although not always successfully).

Summary: take CPL, take (at least) a 3-stop soft GND (and maybe a hard one if you are planning on shooting over the ocean), and take lots of shots.

Have fun on your trip.

John



www.GreatEscapePhotogr​aphy.com (external link)
Facebook Page (external link)
Instagram: @greatescapephotograph​y (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dougsturgess
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
470 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Atlanta | USA
     
Nov 08, 2008 08:09 |  #3

jrader wrote in post #6646610 (external link)

Never been to Machu Picchu, but I feel the urge to add my 2 cents. GNDs are, by far, the best tool to have for outdoor photography, with circular polarizer running a close second. The real beauty of it is that you can still do HDR as well with the GND on the camera. With HDR you get details in the shadows and the highlights (as well as a proper exposure) and the software blends to get a higher dynamic range not possible in a single shot. GNDs are used to balance the light between two areas (usually aligned along the horizon of the sky with subject). GNDs can not be used to get the shadow/highlight details that HDR does. But as I said, you can still do HDR with GNDs on. And since you are not taking the tripod, you will be happy to know that there are HDR programs out there that do alignment (although not always successfully).

Summary: take CPL, take (at least) a 3-stop soft GND (and maybe a hard one if you are planning on shooting over the ocean), and take lots of shots.

Have fun on your trip.

John

Thanks for your advice John. To follow up, just a few questions.
-There won't be defined horizons at this site. Will the GND still be useful? The landscapes I've seen are very jagged w/mountains, clouds, fog, etc.

-Do you have to take the GND off when shooting non-high contrast images i.e., ruins?

-I have a circular polarizer I'm planning on taking. All my lenses have B+W UV filters. I've heard at that altitude you can get a blue cast if you don't use the right filter. I think they were talking about using a UV filter to take care of it. Does that make sense?

-You wouldn't use the circular polarizer AND the GND filter would you?

-How do you decide when to use the circular polarizer or the GND, particularly for this high altitude site?

Thanks for your advice.


Doug Sturgess
www.sturgessart.com (external link)
doug-sturgess.artistwebsite​s.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rustylewis
Member
177 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
     
Nov 08, 2008 12:01 |  #4

Polarizing filters will be valuable, but I doubt you will find much use for GNDs there. I would still take them if you have the room.

The mountains are very tall and irregular. Waynapicchu will stick up higher than the background mountains in most all of the shots you will likely take.

Be sure to get there early and hike to the top of Waynapicchu if you can. The view is spectacular and there will be photo opportunities there that most people do not get. They limit the number of people who can hike to Waynapicchu to around 400 a day and all must start prior to 1:30pm (if I remember correctly).


Rusty

1DM4 | 5DM3 | 16-35 f/2.8L II | 24 TSE f/3.5L II | 24-105 f/4L | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 100 f/2.8L Macro | 100-400L | 600 f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dougsturgess
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
470 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Atlanta | USA
     
Nov 08, 2008 13:45 |  #5

rustylewis wrote in post #6648057 (external link)
Polarizing filters will be valuable, but I doubt you will find much use for GNDs there. I would still take them if you have the room.

The mountains are very tall and irregular. Waynapicchu will stick up higher than the background mountains in most all of the shots you will likely take.

Be sure to get there early and hike to the top of Waynapicchu if you can. The view is spectacular and there will be photo opportunities there that most people do not get. They limit the number of people who can hike to Waynu Picchu to around 400 a day and all must start prior to 1:30pm (if I remember correctly).

Thanks for the advice. We're arriving at noon & leaving at 6pm so we'll be there for hopefully some good light toward the end of the day. I hope we can get to Waynu Picchu but not sure if we can with our noon arrival.


Doug Sturgess
www.sturgessart.com (external link)
doug-sturgess.artistwebsite​s.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jrader
Goldmember
Avatar
1,011 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, Hawai'i
     
Nov 08, 2008 18:22 |  #6

dougsturgess wrote in post #6647152 (external link)
Thanks for your advice John. To follow up, just a few questions.
-There won't be defined horizons at this site. Will the GND still be useful? The landscapes I've seen are very jagged w/mountains, clouds, fog, etc.

-Do you have to take the GND off when shooting non-high contrast images i.e., ruins?

-I have a circular polarizer I'm planning on taking. All my lenses have B+W UV filters. I've heard at that altitude you can get a blue cast if you don't use the right filter. I think they were talking about using a UV filter to take care of it. Does that make sense?

-You wouldn't use the circular polarizer AND the GND filter would you?

-How do you decide when to use the circular polarizer or the GND, particularly for this high altitude site?

Thanks for your advice.

Even if you don't have defined horizons, you can still use a soft GND. The transition is not well defined as it is on the hard GND, so you can use it in the case when there are objects (like mountains/trees) on the horizon.

You don't always need to use the GND. I would use it if you include any part of the sky in your shots (if the sky is sufficiently bright).

I'm not sure about UV filter clearing a blue cast. I NEVER use a UV filter, but that's just my choice. Just an extra piece of glass between my subject and the sensor, in my opinion. They might, but I don't think so.

I use my GND and my CPL all the time together. They cause different effects. The GND is used to balance the exposure in which the scene exceeds the dynamic range of the camera sensor. The CPL is used to increase saturation, cut glare and reflections, and can be used to lower the exposure by 1.5 to 2 stops, depending on the CPL.

I personally leave my CPL on almost all of the time. The only time I take it off is to do panoramics (since the color of the sky will be uneven). The GND can be also left on the camera most of the time as well, if shooting a scene in which the sky is included and the sky is bright (which is almost always the case).

Hope this helps.

John



www.GreatEscapePhotogr​aphy.com (external link)
Facebook Page (external link)
Instagram: @greatescapephotograph​y (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blipski
Member
55 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
     
Nov 20, 2008 02:19 as a reply to  @ jrader's post |  #7

I would take the GND with you, it's only a couple ounces at most?

When you photograph from that famous viewpoint near the shack/house, Huayna Picchu is about the same height as the mountains behind it. If you're photographing at the level of most of the ruins at Machu Picchu, Huayna Picchu will stick far above the surrounding mountains.

Either way, I'd bracket your shots. When I went in May, the winter sun was low in the sky. It may be different now during summer, but when I was there, there was a huge difference in exposure between the sky and the mountains. In some pictures, my skies were blown out while one side of Huayna Picchu was in shadows and bringing any detail out in the shadows was very noisy.

Enjoy the trip. You won't believe your eyes when you're there. Simply amazing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dougsturgess
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
470 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Atlanta | USA
     
Nov 20, 2008 07:01 |  #8

blipski wrote in post #6723419 (external link)
I would take the GND with you, it's only a couple ounces at most?

When you photograph from that famous viewpoint near the shack/house, Huayna Picchu is about the same height as the mountains behind it. If you're photographing at the level of most of the ruins at Machu Picchu, Huayna Picchu will stick far above the surrounding mountains.

Either way, I'd bracket your shots. When I went in May, the winter sun was low in the sky. It may be different now during summer, but when I was there, there was a huge difference in exposure between the sky and the mountains. In some pictures, my skies were blown out while one side of Huayna Picchu was in shadows and bringing any detail out in the shadows was very noisy.

Enjoy the trip. You won't believe your eyes when you're there. Simply amazing.

Thanks for your response. After much research I've decided not to spring fir the expense of a GND and 1. Keep my fingers crossed that I will be able to get through w/my tripod and 2. Use photomatix to develop HDR images I'll take. If I can't get the tripod in I will go to plan B and shoot hand held HDR as good as I can. I've read more accounts online of people getting in with tripods than not and I'm hoping our guide can help with getting it in. I'm going to keep my gear as inconspicuous as possible.


Doug Sturgess
www.sturgessart.com (external link)
doug-sturgess.artistwebsite​s.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dougsturgess
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
470 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Atlanta | USA
     
Dec 11, 2008 17:31 |  #9

Ok, I lucked out. I went through the gate at Machupicchu in a group with the Hiram Bingham train & no one even looked for camera gear. I brought my entire camera backpack & tripod without any trouble whatsoever...just sweating til I got in. However, I was there from noon til 530 and I only used the tripod once...for some HDR images of the classic Machupicchu after you first enter, then for a horizontal panoramic shot. Otherwise, I hand held the remaining shots, even the HDR's. The following link has my images I worked on while on the trip. I'm doing them all over here at home. www.flickr.com/dougstu​rgess (external link)


Doug Sturgess
www.sturgessart.com (external link)
doug-sturgess.artistwebsite​s.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,098 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Machu Picchu & graduated neutral density filters
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1236 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.