dotcodotuk wrote in post #15320368
In that case, could you could explain your reasoning with regard to these points?
The left side of the rim is edge with black, presumably from the negative fill card positioned above the glass. If this was a desired effect, why wasn't the entire rim edged in the same manner? And why wasn't such an effect used on the sides of the glass to give some separation from the white background?
What was your thinking with positioning and lighting the strawberry as you have? it doesn't look particularly fresh or appetising and seems to be lurking in the shade. Would you not have preferred this to be lit more evenly, like the edge of the glass below?
Why is there such an uneven shadow lurking in the liquid itself, given the intensity of the light from behind? What is this supposed to show the viewer? To me, it feels like there's something lurking behind the glass, almost as if it was shot in situ and then everything else was edited out in post.
And what is going on with the base of the glass? What made you choose to stand it on the material you did instead of on a lightbox or something similar? You've got all this light spilling through the bottom of the 'stem' of the glass, yet the base shows you the surface it was sat upon.
Just seeing this now. I'll play along...
As I posted elsewhere, this particular image is (with the exception of removing the tripod below and adding a drop shadow) essentially straight out of the camera. the final edited image addressed a few things that are not represented here. The black reflection in the glass rim was removed in the final, the strawberry top was made a bit more green, and the slight bruises on the strawberry side were removed. Beyond that, not much more post editing that I recall.
The black card above is a gobo largely for the benefit of holding back light on the whipped topping. A consequence of that is the black that you see on the right glass rim. The strawberry and whipped topping is largely lit by a fresnel behind and left, the benefit being the harder light creating sufficient shadowing on the topping as well as providing a sense of direction on the strawberry top. Would I prefer it to be lit more evenly? No.
This is an opaque frozen drink, not even remotely transparent. We quite liked the the shadowing, and concluded that it showed a variety of color shades which was our impression when looking at the drink 'in real life'. The actual true color of theis particular drink (mango something or other...) is closer to the darker portion of the front. I like the fact that the fresnel brought it to life a little without making the entire glass look like orange juice which couldn't be further from the actual color/tone. YMMV.
As I explained, this was a set designed to accommodate a variety of glass shapes with minimal tweaking in between shots. There were a lot of varied drinks to get through in relatively short time. If you've ever shot glassware, i think you'd understand why this wasn't put on a plexi surface or lit from below. A hurricane, martini or margherita glass for instance don't work particularly well with bottom lighting because of the shape of the glass. I don't have an issue with the base of the glass showing the surface that it was shot on. When it's printed in the final layout, it in fact gives the glass a sense of sitting on a surface. imo at least. Again, YMMV.
This kind of reminds me...How many photographers does it take to change a lightbulb? 