Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 13 Nov 2008 (Thursday) 15:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Alaska Tidal Flats

 
Photo_Joe
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Nov 13, 2008 15:20 |  #1

Two favorite shots from an afternoon excursion to some relatively nearby tidal flats. I caught some ice crystals that must have formed as the water receded back out to sea, and then the sunset as the tide was flowing back, carrying quite a bit of ice with it.
Good thing I brought my snowshoes and crampons this day, otherwise I probably would have taken a very cold bath.

Sunset:
f/4.5
1/160
ISO 200
10mm (Sigma 10-20mm)
No adjustments to the photo

Ice:
f/11
1/60
ISO640
56mm (Canon 28-135mm)
Contrast and black point changed slightly

Have at it, all critiques are welcome!


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Equipment:
Canon - 40D, 24-105mm f/4 L
Sigma - 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 150mm f/2.8 Macro, 50mm f/1.4
Other - Canon Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Nov 13, 2008 15:26 |  #2

#1 is beautiful. A most unusual picture for us mid-Atlantic region folks. We don't see anything like this around here.
#2 is lacking depth of focus and is too obscure - can't make out what we are looking at. Guess you had to be there.

Congratulations on #1.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JuiceBox
Senior Member
Avatar
495 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey
     
Nov 13, 2008 15:44 |  #3

I love the first one. I think if you bumped the exposure up just the tinniest bit (please tell me you shot in RAW, please!) then it would help. Also, the horizon seems to be just the tiniest bit crooked (lower on the right). Maybe my head is on crooked, I can't tell at this point.


Nikon D300s -- Nikkor 24mm F/2.8 -- Nikkor 28-80mm F/3.3-5.6 -- Nikkor 135mm F/2.8 -- Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
0ozma
Member
246 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Nov 13, 2008 15:57 |  #4

Wow. I love both of them. Agree that #2 could use a bit more DOF but I still like it how it is now.


Canon 50D | Canon EF 50mm F/1.4 | Canon 70-200mm F/4 L | Canon 17-55mm F/2.8 |
Save $5 on a new Zenfolio account using this code:
3P6-72F-UB8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Photo_Joe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Nov 13, 2008 15:59 as a reply to  @ JuiceBox's post |  #5

I can see how #2 would be hard to understand if you have no idea what it is. Its always hard for me to get a good feeling of DOF when I'm in the field and looking at a small LSD screen. And of course when I get home and load them on my computer it turns out the DOF was razor thin :confused:

Juicebox, I did shot that photo in RAW, I'll play with it a bit more this afternoon if I have time, and now that you mention it, I think the horizon is a little crooked... that or you've got me seeing things :lol:


Equipment:
Canon - 40D, 24-105mm f/4 L
Sigma - 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 150mm f/2.8 Macro, 50mm f/1.4
Other - Canon Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JuiceBox
Senior Member
Avatar
495 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey
     
Nov 13, 2008 16:00 |  #6

I wouldn't be surprised if you were; all that talk about LSD and all :P.

Anyway, use the ruler tool and check it out. The more I look at it, the more it appears that it is crooked.


Nikon D300s -- Nikkor 24mm F/2.8 -- Nikkor 28-80mm F/3.3-5.6 -- Nikkor 135mm F/2.8 -- Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Photo_Joe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Nov 13, 2008 17:45 as a reply to  @ JuiceBox's post |  #7

Ok, round two:
Straightened the horizon, as well as small adjustments to black point, saturation and contrast. Thoughts on this one?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Equipment:
Canon - 40D, 24-105mm f/4 L
Sigma - 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 150mm f/2.8 Macro, 50mm f/1.4
Other - Canon Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Nov 13, 2008 20:28 |  #8

You've just made very good into excellent!
Congratulations!


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Nov 13, 2008 22:19 as a reply to  @ Robert_Lay's post |  #9

That is a great improvement.

I am guessing that the close-up shot is ice (or from an electron microscope), but there aren't enough clues about the subject of the image.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sneakerskilledme
Member
56 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Tacoma/Seattle, Washington
     
Nov 14, 2008 00:20 |  #10

the second pic looks like a TS-E of glaciers

the first pic after being editted is GREAT!
great shots!


400D l 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 l 50mm F/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Metalstrm
Goldmember
Avatar
1,056 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Malta
     
Nov 14, 2008 01:22 |  #11

Great picture but I would sharpen it up quite a bit as it seems a bit soft.


Kristian D'Amato

http://www.krisdamato.​com (external link) - just my flickr at the moment.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nikon.faison
Member
32 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: south jersey
     
Nov 14, 2008 03:14 |  #12

that first image of the ice, is SICK..
and i would sell my mother for a 10mm lens. GREAT capture.



FlickR (external link) / Myspace (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TekHouse
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Earth
     
Nov 14, 2008 08:13 |  #13

That last one with the straight horizon is really good, I like it mate!


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Photo_Joe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Nov 14, 2008 12:35 |  #14

Thanks for the comments guys, I'm sure I'll have many many more pictures of ice and snow from our winter up here in Alaska.

I do agree that the image is a bit soft, the one downfall of a wide angle that I've discovered: its really hard to tell if your subjects are in focus since they are so far away half the time.

Second shot is of just some odd ice formations, but I agree if you don't know what it is, it can be hard to understand the shot. Somewhat abstract, which is partially why I like it so much.


Equipment:
Canon - 40D, 24-105mm f/4 L
Sigma - 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 150mm f/2.8 Macro, 50mm f/1.4
Other - Canon Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Nov 14, 2008 14:39 |  #15

Photo_Joe wrote in post #6686415 (external link)
...... the one downfall of a wide angle that I've discovered: its really hard to tell if your subjects are in focus since they are so far away half the time.......

It is also the strong point of a wide angle lens because they have a very large depth of field in comparison to normal and telephoto lenses. If you focus the lens on something at the hyperfocal distance, you can be confident that everything from half that distance to infinity will appear in focus.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,075 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Alaska Tidal Flats
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2782 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.