Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 14 Nov 2008 (Friday) 13:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

White balance not ...balanced? What am I doing wrong?

 
lowcrust
Senior Member
Avatar
948 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Scandinavia
     
Nov 14, 2008 13:10 |  #1

The few times that I shoot with a white balance card on location I've used a thin grey cardboard card that I got with a photo magazine a long time ago. It has worked well enough for my needs (obviosly not color critical enough that I cannot eye-ball it myself). Recently a friend bought a small WhiBal and I thought I'd borrow it for some test shots at home to see how it compared to the piece of cardboard that I have, especially after looking through all those impressive videos on their site.

I shoot raw and use my card at the subject where whatever I light I use falls upon. Here's my question; the way to determine a white balance card in real life is to see how balanced or neutral the color channels are in post processing, right?

In Lightroom I use the color picker and when I hover over the WhiBal the channels are way off, like the (low light) image I'm looking at now is 40.0 red, 34.5 green and 29.8 blue, the t-shirt behind it being much more balanced, so is my cheap paper. Is this right/normal? Although the card is very small (with only half of it actually being grey (the other part being the sticker)) I get variations up to several hundred degrees Kelvin depending on where I click on it.

Things get considerably better when I'm using strobes, but so does the white t-shirt or the cheap-o piece of grey cardboard (not to mention the color temperature being right straight out of the camera to begin with).

Am I missing something here?


~ BORN FREE - TAXED TO DEATH! ~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Nov 14, 2008 13:31 |  #2

The WhiBal reading will not be correct until you click on it with the White Balance tool; simply hovering over it is not enough.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lowcrust
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
948 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Scandinavia
     
Nov 14, 2008 13:40 |  #3

Yeah, right, of course. But I'm not talking about the white balance in the image in itself but rather the neutrality of the WhiBal color. Hovering or clicking on it doesn't change the value of the channels (*edit* of course it does, I didn't type that, an evil gnome is playing tricks on me */edit*).

I suspect this has to do with mixed lightning (although I actually only had two spotlights of the same make and age but I know they can vary quite a bit despite of this). I will continue to do some tests tomorrow. It's just I thought a "professional" white balance card would do better in this particular instance, I mean if all I use is strobes the temperature is going to be around 5500K anyways?


~ BORN FREE - TAXED TO DEATH! ~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lowcrust
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
948 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Scandinavia
     
Nov 14, 2008 13:44 |  #4

Ah, wait a minute, I think I get what you're saying now.... It's after I click/adjust the color temperate (with the whibal) that the colors are supposed to be even?


~ BORN FREE - TAXED TO DEATH! ~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lowcrust
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
948 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Scandinavia
     
Nov 14, 2008 13:51 |  #5

I just had a Lightrules moment, please carry on, nothing to see here! =)

*thread locked* :D


~ BORN FREE - TAXED TO DEATH! ~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Nov 14, 2008 14:38 |  #6

LOL...yes, you got it. Hovering only shows you the distribution of color in the light hitting the WhiBal. Clicking the tool on the card will neutralize the image.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Nov 14, 2008 14:47 |  #7

Oh...and another thought.

I don't know what size WhiBal you're using but fortunately Canon cameras only need you to fill the center circle of the frame with a grey card then you can use that shot to set a Custom White Balance in the camera.

That will remove one step from your post processing as your WB will be correct straight out of the camera. Plus, you wouldn't have to ask a question like this one :)


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Nov 14, 2008 15:56 |  #8

lowcrust wrote in post #6686912 (external link)
I just had a Lightrules moment, please carry on, nothing to see here! =)

*thread locked* :D

vmad :evil: :mad:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brantfordbandit
Senior Member
Avatar
504 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 14, 2008 18:59 as a reply to  @ LightRules's post |  #9

so why couldn't i just shoot a piece of non- glossy white plexiglass?


canonguy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Nov 14, 2008 19:11 |  #10

brantfordbandit wrote in post #6688632 (external link)
so why couldn't i just shoot a piece of non- glossy white plexiglass?

When you use Whibal to set WB for raw files, you use the gray part of the Whibal card, not the white part. It's a neutral gray; that's what makes the ACR white balance tool work.


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brantfordbandit
Senior Member
Avatar
504 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 14, 2008 19:27 as a reply to  @ Peano's post |  #11

my Canon manual says u can just shoot a piece of white paper, so the non glare white plexiglass should work.


canonguy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Nov 14, 2008 20:03 |  #12

brantfordbandit wrote in post #6688780 (external link)
my Canon manual says u can just shoot a piece of white paper, so the non glare white plexiglass should work.

Those are instructions for setting custom white balance in the camera when shooting jpeg. The original question was about setting white balance when post-processing raw files. When using a Whibal card for that purpose, you use ACR's white balance tool on the gray part of the card.


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Nov 14, 2008 20:15 |  #13

brantfordbandit wrote in post #6688632 (external link)
so why couldn't i just shoot a piece of non- glossy white plexiglass?

brantfordbandit wrote in post #6688780 (external link)
my Canon manual says u can just shoot a piece of white paper, so the non glare white plexiglass should work.

So who are you going to believe?

I shoot a grey white balance target and set my custom WB in camera. I also use the same WB target for post processing if I don't get a custom WB set in the camera.

The issue with white is that white is not neutral. Truth is white comes in many colors. And since the manual says PAPER you're already going off track using Plexiglas. I'll bet white plexi comes in many colors too.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Nov 15, 2008 11:09 |  #14

If you shoot white paper ON THE METER READING, it will photograph gray, just what the cam needs for Custom WB. Use that exposure for the WB set-up.
It's pretty good for adjusting exposure too, when there are bright highlights that aren't important in the frame.
Need an exposure crutch?

Gray Card…White Paper. What’s best?

And just to muddy the waters a bit, remember that the "correct" WB isn't necessarily the "right" WB for a particular image? Would you want to neutralize the nice colors in a sunset? ;)
While I always start out with a WB, I sometimes warm up or cool down a shot, depending on what I think looks good. Sometimes, I only will do that to part of an image. In this one, I replaced the sky & then decided the Mustang needed some reflections from the sky:
Mustang & B-17 + PS

Would the last shot here, '40 Fords - Three of 'em! look better if I'd used the right WB?

How about these? A post WB off her teeth gives a totally different & uninteresting image:
Barbara Payton at the Carrick House Concert 11/23/08


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,520 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
White balance not ...balanced? What am I doing wrong?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1712 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.