Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Feb 2005 (Monday) 12:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Nodal point of a 17-40?

 
abel
Senior Member
Avatar
386 posts
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Feb 28, 2005 12:45 |  #1

Hey guys I was browsing around on the reallyrightstuff.com website and read some interesting things about panoramic photography. In a short write up they mentions lens Nodal Points…

I know this point varies from lens to lens and was curious to see if anyone knew what the Nodal Point of a 17-40 lens is?

I’ve been searching around on the internet and I’m not sure if anyone keeps a listing of this obscure spec. Ive found a complete listing for Nikon lenses but have not seen anything for Canons…

Thanks a ton guys...


Abel Longoria
http://www.HoustonPoto​g.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
386 posts
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Feb 28, 2005 12:56 |  #2

i forgot to add one other thing... i know the Nodal point will change depending on what focal length you set but i was hoping someone had specs on say the 17mm and/or the 40mm end...


Abel Longoria
http://www.HoustonPoto​g.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cactusclay
Goldmember
1,610 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Feb 28, 2005 13:26 |  #3

Why?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Feb 28, 2005 13:38 |  #4

To make use of the nodal point, you'll need a method of precisely centering the camera over it. It's probably easier to get a macro focussing rail and trial-and-error it for your camera and lens. To calculate it, you'd need to know all the specifics about the different elements and lens groups that make up the lens, and do some light-ray tracing calculations, or find it by experimentation. Canon hasn't published it.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cactusclay
Goldmember
1,610 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Feb 28, 2005 13:40 |  #5

I guess I would contact Canon and ask them.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Feb 28, 2005 14:29 as a reply to  @ cactusclay's post |  #6

To phrase it differently, I would say that the nodal point is important if you are trying to do wide panoramics. The regular tripod hole on the bottom of your camera body is typically not correct. Sometimes the nodal point in in the center of the lens, and sometimes it is as far back as inside the lens mount. You ought to be able to figure this out by experiment.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,387 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
     
Feb 28, 2005 14:40 |  #7

It's probably less important if these are going to be digitally stitched together. Photoshop does make it very easy to fix together slightly offset photos. I've taken several panoramas handheld and joined them with little effort. The only key thing is remembering to switch the camera to manual.


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
glangston
Member
Avatar
238 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Huntington Beach CA
     
Feb 28, 2005 14:46 as a reply to  @ Citizensmith's post |  #8

http://www.kaidan.com/​nodalpoint.html (external link)


EOS 20D(w remote switch), 17-40 f/4 L, 70-200 f/4L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, TC 1.4X, 580EX (w/off camera shoe), Canon S500, Apple Powerbook G4 867 w/Photoshop CS2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,566 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Nodal point of a 17-40?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1616 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.