Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 15 Nov 2008 (Saturday) 17:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Does it matter that its soft?

 
Christides
Member
56 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Nov 15, 2008 17:06 |  #1

Here's a picture of my boy. nine times out of ten i never get a sharp shot of him but anyway.

was shot spare of the moment with only natural light comin thru windows and door.

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3245/3029028233_fe9aeb2bf9.jpg?v=0
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …photographics/3​029028233/  (external link)

Facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Model Mayhem (external link)
Canon 1D2, 5D, Canon 24-70, Sigma 70-200 + bits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KarlosDaJackal
Goldmember
Avatar
1,740 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Nov 15, 2008 18:03 |  #2

At that size its hard to tell its soft. Anyway his eyes look good, the only obvious soft part is his hands, probably because he was moving them but I don't think the picture is any weaker for it. If anything a bit more motion blur on them might have been good.

I think its pretty decent actually, should be able to get a 6x4 out of it.


My Website (external link) - Flick (external link)r (external link) - Model Mayhem (external link) - Folio32 (external link)
Gimp Tutorials by me on POTN
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rankinia
Senior Member
449 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Nov 15, 2008 18:39 |  #3

Its your son that youve captured. Does it matter to you that its not perfectly sharp? (though it doesnt look too bad this size to me). If the answer is no, then it doesnt.


1ds, 30d, 17-40/4 180/3.5, mt-24, 580ex2
http://adamrose.wordpr​ess.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 466
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Nov 15, 2008 19:09 as a reply to  @ Rankinia's post |  #4

Hey, I've got 6 and none of them is the sharpest tool in the shed. and that's ok.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Nov 15, 2008 19:15 as a reply to  @ Rankinia's post |  #5

As others have mentioned it's hard to tell at such a small size. One thing you can try when you get images that are soft is smart sharpen.

I ran a pass of smart sharpen (and adjusted the white balance). If you like it, give it a try on the original. Let me know if you have any questions.


Hold on, looks like I reposted you original here.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Nov 15, 2008 19:28 as a reply to  @ doidinho's post |  #6

Ok, here is the reworked one.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Nov 15, 2008 19:31 |  #7

By the way, what were your settings (ISO, shutter speed, and aperture)?


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Nov 15, 2008 19:47 as a reply to  @ doidinho's post |  #8

The sharpness didn;t ctach my eye, but I find it noisy? Could be just at this size...

Cute fella. Tried a B&W..

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christides
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
56 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Nov 15, 2008 22:50 |  #9

1/125 F2.8 ISO800 42mm. I ran it through Lightroom afterwards as it was alot darker and i cropped a fair chunk off the original image.
I tried to calibrate my monitor but i still think the colours may be out still. will try again later. I think the reworked one and the B&W one are an improvement on my original :)

In the house i have to chase him around at a high ISO as its quite dark inside and you cant predict his movements. having a flash on the camera never seems to give nice results so yeah...there you have it. im starting to learn to live with noise and maybe one day ill learn to use it as a tool i guess.


Facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Model Mayhem (external link)
Canon 1D2, 5D, Canon 24-70, Sigma 70-200 + bits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christides
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
56 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Nov 15, 2008 22:51 |  #10

Robert, why did you choose skyports over anything else?


Facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Model Mayhem (external link)
Canon 1D2, 5D, Canon 24-70, Sigma 70-200 + bits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Nov 16, 2008 01:05 as a reply to  @ Christides's post |  #11

Your going to have to really nail the focus to get a sharp full body shot at 2.8. The difficulty is compounded when you are chasing him around the house.

I would experiment with stopping down a stop and slowing the shutter speed to 1/60; it may give you better results, but then again it may not. I 'm sure with some practice you will sort everything out and find a technique that works for you.

I went w/ the Skyports because I couldn't afford Pocket Wizards and wanted something more reliable than the e-bay triggers. The Cybersync's were not out yet so that wasn't an option. I have used the Cybersync's since and am glad that I didn't get them as I don't care for the channel selector one bit.


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KarlosDaJackal
Goldmember
Avatar
1,740 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Nov 16, 2008 03:47 as a reply to  @ doidinho's post |  #12

If you want sharp motion capture, you need flash. If you want it to look pleasing as well you want bounced flash (of a white ceiling or wall) This will also let you use f/5.6 @ iso100 and still have a properly exposed shot. I've used up to f/16 with a flash bounced in a medium sized room, and could have gone up to f/22 if I went with iso200.

Bouncing of the ceiling looks natural because its effect is like you temporarily installed 500watt light bulbs in whatever part of the ceiling the flash hits, so the lighting looks the same only you now have much more of it to play with.

The flash is your shutter speed and the slowest a flash will fire is usually 1/700 so motion should not be a problem. Set your shutter to 1/200 to block out whatever natural light is left as the flash will easily light up a room, and you can set your white balance to flash and know its correct.


My Website (external link) - Flick (external link)r (external link) - Model Mayhem (external link) - Folio32 (external link)
Gimp Tutorials by me on POTN
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dompap21
Member
62 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Nov 16, 2008 14:10 |  #13

It's always difficult to photograph an active toddler. Try using toys and other props to distract while you shoot...


2x30D+5D|Sigma 15-30 and fast 50|Canon 24-70L 135L and 100-400L| 2x580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Avatar
3,079 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Nov 16, 2008 17:25 |  #14

When it's your boy, and you like the picture it really doesn't matter at all.
Sharpness isn't everything but the memory will be there forever.

cheers


BiLL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kiwichris
I forget how I didded that!
Avatar
3,998 posts
Gallery: 199 photos
Likes: 1603
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Milford Auckland NZ
     
Nov 16, 2008 19:23 |  #15

As to the original question, Does it matter?

Depends, what is the finish size you want? as blowing it up will make it softer, but, a child of this age is soft, soft to the touch, soft in features etc. A little softness accents the natural way they are, does not to my mind, detract from the pic. To me, the sharper version above, has taken away something of the 'cute and cuddly'.

Just my thoughts.


Panasonic Lumix G9 and some lenses
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/chriswaynzpics/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,646 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Does it matter that its soft?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is EBiffany
1598 guests, 98 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.