Uhm, all of it? I pay exactly what I see.
Not exactely...you generally have federal. state and/or local taxes included in the price of gas...ours is 17cents tax per gallon..its all included in the price you see...but its there
Nov 20, 2008 19:09 | #46 Calzinger wrote in post #6720912 Uhm, all of it? I pay exactly what I see. Not exactely...you generally have federal. state and/or local taxes included in the price of gas...ours is 17cents tax per gallon..its all included in the price you see...but its there EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Calzinger Goldmember 1,798 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: New York More info | Nov 20, 2008 19:49 | #47 digirebelva wrote in post #6728444 Not exactely...you generally have federal. state and/or local taxes included in the price of gas...ours is 17cents tax per gallon..its all included in the price you see...but its there Ah, got ya. I wonder if this website is accurate. http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgastaxes.asp "That building in the background is distracting."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I topped off for $1.97 in the suburbs today. 16 gallons cost about $32. Suddenly having a gas guzzling V8 isn't that bad anymore www.garyhebdingjr.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NathanS Member 50 posts Joined Sep 2008 More info | Nov 21, 2008 00:27 | #50 1.97 a gallon? That is amazing.. We up here in alberta pay about 79c/litre for gas! Way cheaper than the 1.40$/litre it hit this summer!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
[CaliGirl] Senior Member 524 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Antelope Valley, CA More info | Nov 21, 2008 01:33 | #51 $2.13 tonight in west hills, CA ..::Monique Amena::..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 21, 2008 07:19 | #52 gary88 wrote in post #6728719 I topped off for $1.97 in the suburbs today. 16 gallons cost about $32. Suddenly having a gas guzzling V8 isn't that bad anymore ![]() Dont get used to it, its not going to stay down there forever EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 21, 2008 07:24 | #53 Calzinger wrote in post #6728636 Ah, got ya. I wonder if this website is accurate. http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgastaxes.asp Probably pretty close, I know a lot of states were thinking about raising gas taxes this summer but most considered it political suicide with gas hitting $4 + gal, now they might try it..you know they want us to try more fuel efficient vechicles, great we do that, but guess what that means less fuel is being bought...which means less tax revenue etc...so then they are going to want to raise the fuel tax to make up the difference...in the end we still get screwed.. EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shadowman Senior Member 336 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Massachusetts More info | Nov 21, 2008 07:46 | #54 $1.72 Canon 5D M II / 24-70 F2.8L / 70-200 2.8L / 85mm 1.2L / 16-35mm 2.8L / 1.4X II / 580 EX II / Alien Bees w/everything
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thomascanty Bold. Pink.Gone, but not forgotten. 38,071 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2003 Location: Temporarily Retired More info | Head to your local station and demand your free gas. I saw a story on the news last night that there's a station in Pasadena that's at $1.89... My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Just saw on the news this morning there is a station on one side of town with prices in the $1.52 range...I need to go and get a picture of it...so i can show my daughter when she gets older.. EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Calzinger Goldmember 1,798 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: New York More info | Nov 21, 2008 10:21 | #57 digirebelva wrote in post #6731082 Probably pretty close, I know a lot of states were thinking about raising gas taxes this summer but most considered it political suicide with gas hitting $4 + gal, now they might try it..you know they want us to try more fuel efficient vechicles, great we do that, but guess what that means less fuel is being bought...which means less tax revenue etc...so then they are going to want to raise the fuel tax to make up the difference...in the end we still get screwed.. ![]() The highest I had ever seen was $4.60/gal (93 oct). And to be honest, I didn't think it was that insane. Regular was averaging $4.20/gal over the summer. Spending $80 to fill up your tank was nothing out of the ordinary. I even laughed at a few people when they went to the attendant with a ten dollar bill. "That building in the background is distracting."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 21, 2008 10:53 | #58 Calzinger wrote in post #6732049 The highest I had ever seen was $4.60/gal (93 oct). And to be honest, I didn't think it was that insane. Regular was averaging $4.20/gal over the summer. Spending $80 to fill up your tank was nothing out of the ordinary. I even laughed at a few people when they went to the attendant with a ten dollar bill. I suppose this is all hypocritical comin' from the guy with the ridiculously gas-guzzlin' V8. Man, even I make a Hummer look good. ![]() Yeah but just think of what you can do with the extra $30 + or so a week that EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Calzinger Goldmember 1,798 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: New York More info | Nov 21, 2008 11:58 | #59 digirebelva wrote in post #6732297 Yeah but just think of what you can do with the extra $30 + or so a week that you are not now putting into your tank..after a few months I see a nice new "L" lens on someone's camera ![]() I'd be impressed if you saved over $30 a month with a hybrid. Their combustion engines are just as inefficient as those in a Civic or Corolla, and those engines are used when you're at speed. The electric engine is used minimally on a long daily commute, only used when you're traveling locally. And honestly, who drives an entire tank through a city at 20 mph? You save a little bit of money over a long period of time. If you ask me, I'll spend the extra $100 a year for luxury. It's like how some people don't mind spending the extra $200-$300 a year on higher octane fuel to reduce knocking and improve fuel mileage. Of course that only applies to high performance (high compression) engines. Fillin' up 93-oct in your Camry is a complete waste of money. Contrarily, fillin' high octane in your 7-series will actually increase mileage and performance. "That building in the background is distracting."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
andrew748 Goldmember 1,365 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Surrey More info | Nov 21, 2008 12:12 | #60 lol www.andrew748.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is NekoZ8 1342 guests, 107 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||